scholarly journals A Comparative Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation of Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification Systems and Limb Fracture Classification Schemes

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554484-s-0035-1554484
Author(s):  
Julio Urrutia ◽  
Tomas Zamora ◽  
Ianiv Klaber ◽  
Mauricio Campos ◽  
Ratko Yurac
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554440-s-0035-1554440
Author(s):  
Julio Urrutia ◽  
Tomas Zamora ◽  
Ratko Yurac ◽  
Mauricio Campos ◽  
Joaquin Palma ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jai Deep Thakur ◽  
Elizabeth Wild ◽  
Richard Menger ◽  
Matthew Hefner ◽  
Nimer Adeeb ◽  
...  

Abstract The concept of spinal cord injury has existed since the earliest human civilizations, with the earliest documented cases dating back to 3000 BC under the Egyptian Empire. Howevr, an understanding of this field developed slowly, with real advancements not emerging until the 20th century. Technological advancements including the dawn of modern warfare producing mass human casualties instigated revolutionary advancement in the field of spine injury and its management. Spine surgeons today encounter “Chance” and “Holdsworth” fractures commonly; however, neurosurgical literature has not explored the history of these physicians and their groundbreaking contributions to the modern understanding of spine injury. A literature search using a historical database, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed was performed. As needed, hospitals and native universities were contacted to add their original contributions to the literature. George Quentin Chance, a Manchester-based British physician, is well known to many as an eminent radiologist of his time who described the eponymous fracture in 1948. Sir Frank Wild Holdsworth (1904-1969), a renowned British orthopedic surgeon who laid a solid foundation for rehabilitation of spinal injuries under the aegis of the Miners' Welfare Commission, described in detail the management of thoraco-lumbar junctional rotational fracture. The work of these 2 men laid the foundation for today's understanding of spinal instability, which is central to modern spine injury classification and management algorithms. This historical vignette will explore the academic legacies of Sir Frank Wild Holdsworth and George Quentin Chance, and the evolution of spinal instability and spine injury classification systems that ensued from their work.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jackson Rucker Staggers ◽  
Thomas Elliot Niemeier ◽  
William E. Neway ◽  
Steven Michael Theiss

Objective. Blunt spinal trauma classification systems are well established and provide reliable treatment algorithms. To date, stability of the spine after civilian gunshot wounds (CGSWS) is poorly understood. Herein, we investigate the validity of trauma classification systems including the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS), Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Severity Score (SLIC), and Denis’ three-column model when applied to spinal penetrating trauma from gunshots, while secondarily evaluating stability of these injuries. Methods. Gunshot injuries to the spine were identified from an institutional database from ICD-nine codes. Trauma scorings systems were applied using traditional criteria. Neurologic compromise and spinal stability were evaluated using follow-up clinic notes and radiographs. Results. Thirty-one patients with CSGSW were evaluated. There was an equal distribution of injuries amongst the spinal levels and spinal columns. Twenty patients had neurological deficits at presentation. Eight patient had a TLICS score >4. Three patients had a SLIC score >4. One patient had surgical treatment. Nonoperative treatment did not lead to spinal instability or adverse outcomes in any cases. The posterior column had a high correlation with neurologic compromise, though not statistically significant (p=.118). Conclusions. The TLICS, SLIC, and three-column classification systems cannot be applied to CSGSW to quantify injury severity, predict outcomes, or guide treatment decision-making. Despite significant neurologic injuries and disruption of multiple spinal columns, CSGSW do not appear to result in unstable injuries requiring operative intervention. Further research is needed to identify the rare spinal gunshot injury that would benefit from immediate surgical intervention.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554158-s-0035-1554158
Author(s):  
Gregory Schroeder ◽  
Alexander Vaccaro ◽  
Christopher Kepler ◽  
John Koerner ◽  
Cumhur Oner ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh A. Patel ◽  
Andrew Dailey ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
Michael Daubs ◽  
James Harrop ◽  
...  

Object The aim of this study was to review the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) and to demonstrate its application through a series of spine trauma cases. Methods The Spine Trauma Study Group collaborated to create and report the TLICS system. The TLICS system is reviewed and applied to 3 cases of thoracolumbar spine trauma. Results The TLICS system identifies 3 major injury characteristics to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries: injury morphology, posterior ligamentous complex integrity, and neurological status. In addition, minor injury characteristics such as injury level, confounding variables (such as ankylosing spondylitis), multiple injuries, and chest wall injuries are also identified. Each major characteristic is assigned a numerical score, weighted by severity of injury, which is then summated to yield the injury severity score. The TLICS system has demonstrated initial success and its use is increasing. Limitations of the TLICS system exist and, in some instances, have yet to be addressed. Despite these limitations, the severity score may provide a basis to judge spinal stability and the need for surgical intervention. Conclusions By addressing both the posterior ligamentous integrity and the patient's neurological status, the TLICS system attempts to overcome the limitations of prior thoracolumbar classification systems. The TLICS system has demonstrated both validity and reliability and has also been shown to be readily learned and incorporated into clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document