scholarly journals Change in Impairment following Operative Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0036-1583088-s-0036-1583088
Author(s):  
Mohammed Shamji ◽  
Lindsay Tetreault ◽  
Shekar Kurpad ◽  
Darrel Brodke ◽  
Justin Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Change in Impairment following Operative Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S173
Author(s):  
Mohammed F. Shamji ◽  
Lindsay Tetreault ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Paul M. Arnold ◽  
Erika D. Brodt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

scholarly journals Change in Functional Impairment, Disability, and Quality of Life Following Operative Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53S-69S ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Fehlings ◽  
Lindsay A. Tetreault ◽  
Shekar Kurpad ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
Jefferson R. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
The Impact

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review was to define the change in impairment, disability, and pain following surgical intervention in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Secondary objectives included to assess the impact of preoperative disease severity and duration of symptoms on outcomes and to summarize complications associated with surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of operative treatment in patients with DCM. Outcomes of interest were functional status, disability, pain, and complications. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the strength of the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Results: Of the 385 retrieved citations, 32 met inclusion criteria and are summarized in this review. Based on our results, pooled standard mean differences showed a large effect for improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association or modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score from baseline at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up: 6 to 12 months (1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 2.43), 13 to 36 months (1.40; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.67), and ≥36 months (1.92; 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.69) (moderate evidence). Surgery also resulted in significant improvements in Nurick, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analogue Scale scores (low to very low evidence). The cumulative incidence of complications was low (14.1%; 95% CI = 10.1% to 18.2%). Conclusion: Surgical intervention for DCM results in significant improvements in functional impairment, disability, and pain and is associated with an acceptably low rate of complications.

The effect of ageing on presentation, management and outcomes in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Grodzinski ◽  
Rory Durham ◽  
Oliver Mowforth ◽  
Daniel Stubbs ◽  
Mark R N Kotter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a disabling neurological condition. The underlying degenerative changes are known to be more common with age, but the impact of age on clinical aspects of DCM has never been synthesised. The objective of this study is to determine whether age is a significant predictor in three domains—clinical presentation, surgical management and post-operative outcomes of DCM. Methods a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases (inception to 12 December 2019), registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019162077) and reported in accordance with preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The inclusion criteria were full text articles in English, evaluating the impact of age on clinical aspects of DCM. Results the initial search yielded 2,420 citations, of which 206 articles were eventually included. Age was found to be a significant predictor in a variety of measures. Within the presentation domain, older patients have a worse pre-operative functional status. Within the management domain, older patients are more likely to undergo posterior surgery, with more levels decompressed. Within the outcomes domain, older patients have a worse post-operative functional status, but a similar amount of improvement in functional status. Because of heterogenous data reporting, meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusion the current evidence demonstrates that age significantly influences the presentation, management and outcomes of DCM. Although older patients have worse health at all individual timepoints, they experience the same absolute benefit from surgery as younger patients. This finding is of particular relevance when considering the eligibility of older patients for surgery.

scholarly journals Does Spondylolisthesis Affect Severity and Outcome of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096045
Author(s):  
Renato Gondar ◽  
Aria Nouri ◽  
Gianpaolo Jannelli ◽  
Karl Schaller ◽  
Enrico Tessitore
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Recovery Ratio ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
The Impact

Study Design: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) with spondylolisthesis remains not well defined, poorly studied, and underreported and plays a minor role in the therapeutic decision-making. Spondylolisthesis, however, is not uncommon and may result in dynamic injury to the spinal cord. We aim to describe the impact of spondylolisthesis in DCM severity and postoperative outcomes. Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA 2015)-based review between 1970 and May 2020 for articles reporting outcome of DCM in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis. Patient clinical and radiological data was recorded at baseline and during postoperative follow-up (FU). A meta-analysis comparing surgical outcome between DCM patients with and without spondylolisthesis assessed by the regular/modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment Scale (mJOA) recovery ratio was completed. Results: A total of 3 studies were included (1 ambispective and 2 retrospective cohorts); 607 patients with DCM were identified, 102 (16.8%) of whom also had spondylolisthesis. DCM patients with spondylolisthesis were significantly older ( P < .05), presented with worse baseline mJOA and Nurick grades ( P < .05 in 2 studies), and were more commonly operated via posterior approaches ( P < .05). All groups experienced a (m)JOA and/or Neck Disability Index score improvement during FU. In the pooled meta-analysis, spondylolisthesis patients showed a significantly lower functional recovery ratio at 2 years compared with other DCM patients ( P = .05). Conclusions: Spondylolisthesis is frequent in older DCM patients and may be a predictor of a more advanced degeneration and subsequent worse baseline conditions and postoperative outcome.

Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment of Distal Biceps Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin M. Looney ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Caroline M. Fryar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Distal Biceps

scholarly journals Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0041
Author(s):  
Blake Bodendorfer ◽  
Brian McCormick ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Christine Conroy ◽  
Caroline Fryar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Tendon Tears

Objectives: The incidence of pectoralis major tendon tears is rising, and repair is generally considered, but there is a paucity of comparative data to demonstrate the superiority of operative treatment. We sought to compare the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of pectoralis major tendon tears. We hypothesized that repair would result in superior outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases. English-language studies were included with a minimum of 6 months average follow-up and 5 cases per study. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was utilized to assess the quality of the existing literature. Meta-analysis of pooled mechanisms of injury and outcomes was completed. Pooled effect-sizes were calculated from random effects models. Continuous variables were assessed using mixed model analysis with the individual study designated as a random effect and the desired treatment for comparison as a fixed effect. Bivariate frequency data was transformed using the Freeman-Tukey log-linear transformation for variance stabilization and then assessed using a mixed model with a study-level random effect and subsequently back-transformed. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Twenty-three articles with 664 injuries met the inclusion criteria for comparison (Figure 1). All patients were male with 63.2% of injuries occurring during weight training, with an average age of 31.48 years and follow-up of 37.02 months. Included studies had moderately high methodological quality. Operative treatment was significantly superior to nonoperative treatment with a relative improvement of functional outcome by 0.70 (P=.027), full isometric strength by 77.07% (P<.001), isokinetic strength by 28.86% (P<.001) compared to the uninjured arm, cosmesis satisfaction by 13.79% (P=.037), and resting deformity by 98.85% (P<.001) (Table 1). There was an overall complication rate of 14.21%, including a 3.08% rate of rerupture, for operative treatment. Conclusion: Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes as compared to nonoperative treatment with an associated 14.21% complication rate. There was a statistically significant improvement in functional outcome, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, cosmesis, and resting deformity. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Natural History of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Rate of Hospitalization Following Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28S-34S ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Tetreault ◽  
Spyridon Karadimas ◽  
Jefferson R. Wilson ◽  
Paul M. Arnold ◽  
Shekar Kurpad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
History Of ◽  
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Study Method: Systematic review (update). Objective: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a degenerative spine disease and the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults worldwide. The objective of this study is to determine the natural history of DCM by updating the systematic review by Karadimas et al. The specific aims of this review were (1) to describe the natural history of DCM and (2) to determine potential risk factors of disease progression. Method: An updated search based on a previous protocol was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Collaboration library for studies published between November 2012 and February 15, 2015. Results: The updated search yielded 3 additional citations that met inclusion criteria and reported the incidence of spinal cord injury and severe disability in patients with DCM. Based on 2 retrospective cohort studies, the incidence rate of hospitalization for spinal cord injury is 13.9 per 1000 person-years in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 4.8 per 1000 person-years in patients with myelopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). In a third small prospective study, the risk of being wheelchair bound or bedridden was 66.7% in DCM patients with OPLL. Conclusion: The overall level of evidence for these estimated rates of hospitalization following spinal cord injury was rated as low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document