Discoid Lateral Meniscus

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (09) ◽  
pp. 854-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Li Dai ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Ai-Guo Zhou ◽  
Gang Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhang

AbstractPartial and total meniscectomies are the most common treatments for patients with discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). We conducted this study to quantitatively assess and compare the outcomes of partial and total meniscectomies for DLM. We also assessed whether the outcomes differed by the type of DLM, duration of follow-up, and age of patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database to identify relevant studies that reported outcomes, including Ikeuchi grade, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee score, Lysholm score, or failure rate, in patients who underwent partial and total meniscectomies. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, whereas mean difference and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous outcomes. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall rate of excellent (E) or good (G) postoperatively was 85.5% (95% CI: 79.5–91.5%). The E or G rate of partial meniscectomy was significantly higher than that of total meniscectomy (OR= 1.97, 95% CI: 1.03–3.75, p = 0.038). Besides, patients younger than 20 years had a significantly higher E or G rate than those older than 20 years. (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.18–8.23, p = 0.022). We also found the E or G rate tended to decrease from short- to long-term follow-up. Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that that partial meniscectomy could achieve better outcomes compared with total meniscectomy for DLM patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2906-2911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Haskel ◽  
Tyler J. Uppstrom ◽  
David M. Dare ◽  
Scott A. Rodeo ◽  
Daniel W. Green

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Ho Kim ◽  
Jin Hwan Ahn ◽  
Joo-Hwan Kim ◽  
Joon Ho Wang

Abstract Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is a common anatomic variant in the knee typically presented in young populations, with a greater incidence in the Asian population than in other populations. As DLM is a congenital anomaly, the ultrastructural features and morphology differ from those of the normal meniscus, potentially leading to meniscal tears. Snapping and pain are common symptoms, with occasional limitations of extension, in patients with DLM. Examination of the contralateral knee is necessary as DLM affects both knees. While simple radiographs may provide indirect signs of a DLM, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. Although DLM was traditionally classified into three categories, namely, complete, incomplete, and Wrisberg DLM, a recent MRI classification provides useful information for surgical planning because the MRI classification was based on the peripheral detachment in patients with DLM, as follows: no shift, anterocentral shift, posterocentral shift, and central shift. Asymptomatic patients require close follow-up without surgical treatment, while patients with symptoms often require surgery. Total or subtotal meniscectomy, which has been traditionally performed, leads to an increased risk of degenerative arthritis; thus, partial meniscectomy is currently considered the treatment of choice for DLM. In addition to partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair of peripheral detachment is recommended for stabilization in patients with DLM to preserve the function of the meniscus. Previous studies have reported that partial meniscectomy with or without meniscal repair is effective and shows superior clinical and radiological outcomes to those of total or subtotal meniscectomy during the short- to long-term follow-up. Our preferred principle for DLM treatment is reduction, followed by reshaping with reference to the midbody of the medial meniscus and repair as firm as possible.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967115S0013
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Haskel ◽  
Tyler J. Uppstrom ◽  
David Dare ◽  
Scott A. Rodeo ◽  
Daniel W. Green

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Okazaki ◽  
Hiromasa Miura ◽  
Shuichi Matsuda ◽  
Makoto Hashizume ◽  
Yukihide Iwamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document