Remnant preservation with tensioning can improve the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background Many studies exist about remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, concern remains for development of a cyclops lesion during remnant preservation. To prevent this, a tensioning method has been suggested. Current study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of remnant preservation in ACL reconstruction with tensioning compared to classical ACL reconstruction. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, ACL reconstruction patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2 years postoperatively were enrolled. For comparison, all participants were divided in two groups: remnant preservation with tensioning (group R) and controls (group C). Clinically, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, and incidence of symptomatic cyclops lesions were evaluated. Radiologically, signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) and size of the synovium on MRI as well as anterior instability in Telos stress radiographs were evaluated. Results A total of 64 patients were enrolled (42 in group R and 22 in group C). The IKDC score in group R (70) was better than that in group C (62; p < 0.05). One patient in group R had a cyclops lesion with clinical symptoms and arthroscopic excision was recommended. Radiologically, the SNQ, synovium area, and anterior instability on Telos radiography showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion Remnant preservation with tensioning is a good option for ACL reconstruction without the development of a cyclops lesion.

Does Transection of the Superficial MCL During HTO Result in Progressive Valgus Instability?

Background: During high tibial osteotomy (HTO), the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) is cut or released at any degree to expose the osteotomy site and achieve the targeted alignment correction according to the surgeon’s preference. However, it is still unclear whether transection of sMCL increases valgus laxity. Purpose: We aimed to assess the outcomes and safety of sMCL transection, especially focusing on iatrogenic valgus instability. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Seventy-two patients (89 knees) who underwent medial open wedge HTO (MOWHTO) with transection of the sMCL between October 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Clinical evaluations, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Tegner and Lysholm scores, were performed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The radiographic parameters hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line convergence angle on standing radiographs (standing JLCA), and weightbearing line (WBL) ratio were assessed preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. To evaluate valgus laxity, we assessed the valgus JLCA and medial joint opening (MJO) at the aforementioned time points using valgus stress radiographs. Results: All clinical results at the 2-year follow-up were significantly improved compared with those obtained at the preoperative assessment ( P < .001). The postoperative HKA angle significantly differed from the preoperative one, and no significant valgus progression was observed during follow-up (preoperative, 8.5°± 2.7°; 3 months, –3.5°± 2.0°; 6 months, –3.2°± 2.3°; 1 year, –3.1°± 2.3°; 2 years, –2.9°± 2.5°; P < .001) The mean WBL ratio was 62.5% ± 9.0% at 2 years postoperatively. The postoperative valgus JLCA at all follow-up points did not significantly change compared with the preoperative valgus JLCA (preoperative, –0.1°± 2.1°; 3 months, –0.2°± 2.4°; 6 months, –0.1°± 2.5°; 1 year, 0.1°± 2.5°; 2 years, 0.2°± 2.2°) The postoperative MJO at all follow-up points did not significantly change compared with the preoperative MJO (preoperative, 7.1 ± 1.7 mm; 3 months, 7.0 ± 1.7 mm; 6 months, 6.9 ± 1.9 mm; 1 year, 6.7 ± 1.8 mm; 2 years, 6.8 ± 1.8 mm). Conclusion: Transection of the sMCL during MOWHTO does not increase valgus laxity and could yield desirable clinical and radiographic results.

Differences in Baseline Characteristics and Outcome Among Responders, Late Responders, and Never-Responders After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Loss to follow-up in registry studies might affect generalizability and interpretation of results. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of nonresponder bias in our anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) registry. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 2042 patients with ACL reconstruction in the Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Registry between 2009 and 2013 were included in the study. Patients who completed the patient-reported outcome measures at 2 or 5 years were considered responders (n = 808). Baseline data and patient characteristics were compared between responders and nonresponders (n = 1234). Both responders and nonresponders were contacted and invited to complete the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Marx scores electronically and respond to questions regarding return to sports and subsequent surgeries. Nonresponders who completed the questionnaires after reminders were considered late responders. The remaining nonresponders were considered never-responders. The late responders (n = 367) completed the questionnaires after a mean follow-up of 7.8 years (range, 6.7-9.6 years), while follow-up for the responders was 6.8 years (range, 5.0-9.7 years). Responders and late responders were then compared in terms of differences in IKDC and Marx scores from baseline to final follow-up. Results: Nonresponders were younger (28.5 vs 31.5 years; P < .001) and more often male (60% vs 53%; P = .003) compared with responders. Responders had a higher level of education and were more likely to be White (79% vs 74%; P = .04). There were no substantial differences in patient characteristics or baseline IKDC and Marx scores between the late responders and never-responders. There were no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes, return to sports, or subsequent surgeries between responders and late responders at a mean follow-up time of 8.8 years (range, 6.7-9.7 years). Repeat email reminders and telephone calls increased response rate by 18% (from 40% to 58%). Conclusion: There was no difference in clinical outcome as evaluated using IKDC and Marx scores between responders and late responders.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After a Modified Albee Procedure

Background: Trochlear dysplasia (TD) is a recognized condition that can become a risk factor for patellofemoral instability. A modified Albee osteotomy procedure using a trapezoidal-shaped wedge to elevate the lateral wall of the trochlea can be used with the goal of preventing further dislocation. However, outcomes studies are lacking, and scores on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are largely unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to identify PROM scores for the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Activity Rating System (ARS), and 100-point pain visual analog scale (VAS) for patients having undergone the modified Albee osteotomy. The hypothesis was that patients will have acceptable pain and function at mid- to long-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From 1999 to 2017, a total of 46 consecutive patients (49 knees) underwent a modified Albee procedure by a single surgeon at a single health care system. These 46 patients were contacted and asked to complete the AKPS, IKDC, ARS, and pain VAS. Additional demographic information was obtained via chart review. Frequencies and rates for categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables of the demographics and PROM scores were calculated. Results: PROM scores were obtained in 28 (30 knees; 61%) of the 46 patients. At minimum follow-up of 82 months, the mean scores were 78.5 ± 18.2 for AKPS, 61.2 ± 11.4 for IKDC, 5.2 ± 5.3 for ARS, and 24.4 ± 28.7 for VAS pain. Notably, only 1 of the 28 patients reported a patellofemoral dislocation since surgery, and this was an isolated incident without further instability. Conclusion: A modified Albee trochlear osteotomy can be a successful adjunctive procedure to prevent recurrent patellar dislocations in patients with mild TD. However, owing to the loss of one-third of patient follow-up scores and the absence of baseline function scores in this study, the procedure deserves further investigation as a way to address a particularly difficult dilemma for a select subset of patients with patellofemoral instability.

Earlier Resolution of Symptoms and Return of Function After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair As Compared With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair (BEAR) has noninferior patient-reported outcomes when compared with autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at 2 years. However, the comparison of BEAR and autograft ACLR at earlier time points—including important outcomes such as resolution of knee pain and symptoms, recovery of strength, and return to sport—has not yet been reported. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that the BEAR group would have higher outcomes on the International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, as well as improved muscle strength, in the early postoperative period. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 100 patients aged 13 to 35 years with complete midsubstance anterior cruciate ligament injuries were randomized to receive a suture repair augmented with an extracellular matrix implant (n = 65) or an autograft ACLR (n = 35). Outcomes were assessed at time points up to 2 years postoperatively. Mixed-model repeated-measures analyses were used to compare BEAR and ACLR outcomes. Patients were unblinded after their 2-year visit. Results: Repeated-measures testing revealed a significant effect of group on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Score ( P = .015), most pronounced at 6 months after surgery (BEAR = 86 points vs ACLR = 78 points; P = .001). There was a significant effect of group on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Symptoms subscale scores ( P = .010), largely attributed to the higher BEAR scores at the 1-year postoperative time point (88 vs 82; P = .009). The effect of group on hamstring strength was significant in the repeated-measures analysis ( P < .001), as well as at all postoperative time points ( P < .001 for all comparisons). At 1 year after surgery, approximately 88% of the patients in the BEAR group and 76% of the ACLR group had been cleared for return to sport ( P = .261). Conclusion: Patients undergoing the BEAR procedure had earlier resolution of symptoms and increased satisfaction about their knee function, as well as improved resolution of hamstring muscle strength throughout the 2-year follow-up period. Registration: NCT02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

Fraturas da Eminência da Tíbia na Infância – Descrição de Abordagem Artroscópica e Resultados Funcionais

Pediatric fractures of the tibial eminence are relatively rare, equivalent to the anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the adult. Severely displaced tibial eminence fractures should be treated surgically. Arthroscopy is preferred as it allows for accurate diagnosis and treatment of associated lesions and reduction and fixation of all types of tibial spine fractures while reducing the morbidity associated with open techniques. We report the clinical and radiological results of two cases with displaced tibial eminence fractures, submitted to surgical treatment and the arthroscopic technique of internal fixation with absorbable suture. After a follow-up of 18 months both patients had great improvement. Radiographic exams confirm complete fracture healing at 6 weeks of follow-up. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score were excellent (96 and 98 points) and the range of motion of the injured knees were also similar to the no-injured knees. This arthroscopic technique is simple, reproducible and very useful in dealing with these fractures, allowing to obtain excellent functional results.

MIDDLE PATH REGIMEN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF TRAUMATIC DISLOCATION OF KNEE JOINT WITH VASCULAR DEFICIT.

Background: Dislocation of the knee joint is one of the most under-reported orthopaedic emergencies due to its ability to undergo spontaneous reduction. It carries a high risk of involving the popliteal artery and peroneal nerve both acutely, or in the long term. Due to this catastrophic potential of the condition, it has been well established that it warrants prompt diagnosis and management. It may be secondary to ultra-low, low or high velocity trauma which makes every dislocation case unique due to involvement of different joint structures, capsule or fractures of the articulating bones. A broad spectrum of treatment modalities (both conservative and surgical) has been documented for this condition, with the latter showing better results across most studies. In developing countries like India, the nancial chasm is relatively bigger with a major chunk of the population unable to bear the cost of complete surgical management. Objective: To assess the functional outcome in patients with frank knee dislocations with multiligamentous injuries and vascular decit treated by a middle path regimen of an extended period of external xator and immobilization. Method: A prospective study was undertaken from January 2018 to July 2020 involving 10 patients with knee joint dislocations with vascular decit and multiligamentous injury, treated by an extended period of external xator application and immobilization. Fasciotomy was done wherever needed, in association with split thickness skin grafting. The assessments were made using Lysholm knee scoring scale (LKSS), International Knee Documentation Committee Scores (IKDC), range of motion (ROM), antero- posterior tibial translation (AP translation) and overall patient satisfaction on every follow-up. Results: The mean LKSS score was 78.3±6.23, mean IKDC score was 68.17±5.34, mean ROM progressively increased to 135.8⁰ with a mean extension lag of 2.2⁰, while the mean AP tibial translation was noted to be 9.16 mm. No poor result or complication was reported. Conclusion: The middle path regimen provides an affordable alternative for providing a stable knee to patients who are ill-affording and are expected to have a sedentary lifestyle, without indulging into rigorous activities

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (Fulkerson procedure) on women athlete with anterior knee pain: a case series

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is one of the most frequent complaints in knee conditions of adolescent and young adult patients. Tibial tuberosity osteotomy (Fulkerson procedure) is a well-described treatment option for a broad range of patellofemoral joint disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of tibial tubercle osteotomy and prognostic factors correlated with the outcomes in adolescents’ athletes affected by anterior knee pain. Three patients treated with tibial tubercle osteotomy for anterior knee pain were prospectively evaluated using the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the part of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to find different potential risk factors as an objective evaluation. The three cases are showing improvement in overall scores, both in six months (WOMAC 72.4; KUJALA 64.6%; IKDC 52.1%) and after one year (WOMAC 82.6; KUJALA 83.3%; IKDC 70.3%) following the surgical procedure. Patient 1 and patient 2 obeyed the physiotherapy schedules and checked their condition regularly. Their scores indicate an immense improvement than patient 3, who did not comply with the physiotherapy nor the check-up. However, the comparison analysis shows a significant increase of the scores for all three assessment methods (WOMAC, KUJALA and IKDC), that implies a good result of clinical outcome may still be achieved even without a close follow up. Even though the Fulkerson procedure was the treatment option for a broad range of AKP, a different comprehensive range result of the scores was found.

Arabic version of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form (IKDC): Translation and validation

BACKGROUND: In order to administer the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) questionnaire to Arabic speakers, a rigorous process of cross-cultural adaptation and validation is required in order to reach equivalence between the original publication and target version of the questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study is to translate and culturally adapt the IKDC into Arabic to suit the Arabic population. The secondary aim is to assess the Arabic version of the IKDC in order to test the psychometric characteristics (reliability, validity and dimensionality). METHODS: The translation process has been carried out according to cross-cultural adaptation guidelines in accordance with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine guidelines with forward/backward translations and pre-testing. The Arabic IKDC, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), RAND-36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) questionnaire, and visual analogue scales (VAS) of pain were tested in 105 ACLR patients. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity and content validity were evaluated. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability proved excellent with a high value for the intraclass correlation coefficient (r= 0.95). The internal consistency was strong (Cronbach’s α= 0.91). Good construct validity by the strong correlations between similar component of the KOOS subscales, Rand-36 subscales and VAS, and good content validity with absence of floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The Arabic version of the IKDC is a valid and reliable instrument for Arabic patients with ACLR. However, further research is required with a more varied knee sample in order to enable generalisation to a wider population.

A High-Sensitivity International Knee Documentation Committee Survey Index From the PROMIS System: The Next-Generation Patient-Reported Outcome for a Knee Injury Population

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measure progression and quality of care. While legacy PROs such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey are well-validated, a lengthy PRO creates a time burden on patients, decreasing adherence. In recent years, PROs such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference surveys were developed as computer adaptive tests, reducing time to completion. Previous studies have examined correlation between legacy PROs and PROMIS; however, no studies have developed effective prediction models utilizing PROMIS to create an IKDC index. While the IKDC is the standard knee PRO, computer adaptive PROs offer numerous practical advantages. Purpose: To develop a nonlinear predictive model utilizing PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference to estimate IKDC survey scores and examine algorithm sensitivity and validity. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The MOTION (Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network) database is a prospectively collected repository of PROs and intraoperative variables. Patients undergoing knee surgery completed the IKDC and PROMIS surveys at varying time points. Nonlinear multivariable predictive models using Gaussian and beta distributions were created to establish an IKDC index score, which was then validated using leave-one-out techniques and minimal clinically important difference analysis. Results: A total of 1011 patients completed the IKDC and PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference, providing 1618 complete observations. The algorithms for the Gaussian and beta distribution were validated to predict the IKDC (Pearson = 0.84-0.86; R2 = 0.71-0.74; root mean square error = 9.3-10.0). Conclusion: The publicly available predictive models can approximate the IKDC score. The results can be used to compare PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference against historical IKDC scores by creating an IKDC index score. Serial use of the IKDC index allows for a lower minimal clinically important difference than the conventional IKDC. PROMIS can be substituted to reduce patient burden, increase completion rates, and produce orthopaedic-specific survey analogs.