Closed Reduction Conversion of a Dual Mobility Dislocation to an Intraprosthetic Dislocation

2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 121-124
Author(s):  
Carlos Higuera ◽  
Michael Bloomfield ◽  
Daniel Mesko

AbstractBuilding on a paucity of prior reported cases, we report on a patient with an off-label dual mobility liner, who sustained a dislocation. Following closed reduction in the emergency room, catching/grinding was felt, and imaging confirmed an intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD). This required revision hip arthroplasty. Dual mobility dislocations have the unique risk of conversion to IPDs during closed reduction attempts. There should be a low threshold to perform closed reductions in the operating room (OR) setting by an orthopaedic surgeon under full relaxation/sedation to optimize success and reduce the risk of creating an IPD.

2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Ovninder Johal ◽  
Blake Eyberg ◽  
Russell Meldrum ◽  
J. Walker

AbstractDual-mobility bearing total hip arthroplasty offers several advantages over traditional prosthesis designs in the treatment of degenerative hip disease. Over decades of use, they have shown proven benefits in both durability and stability. However, despite their practical and theoretical advantages, they present a unique mode of failure not seen with other implants. In this report, the authors present two patients who sustained intraprosthetic dislocation of their dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty components during closed reduction of a hip dislocation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Kamil Kurczyński ◽  
Artur Pepłoński ◽  
Piotr Cieślik ◽  
Marta Burbul(

Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the dual-mobile acetabular cup is a rare complication. Most often, it is the result of wear of the polyethylene liner. It can also occur during a closed reduction of a dislocated dual-mobile cup. It is extremely important to recognize this complication immediately in order to avoid the consequences. This paper presents the first case of iatrogenic intraprosthetic dislocation at the Traumatology and Orthopaedics Department of the Military Medical Institute, our management of the case and suggestions for treating patients with a dislocation of the dual-mobile acetabular cup.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1097-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Neri ◽  
Bertrand Boyer ◽  
Jean Geringer ◽  
Alexandre Di Iorio ◽  
Jacques H. Caton ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Darrith ◽  
P. M. Courtney ◽  
C. J. Della Valle

Aims Instability remains a challenging problem in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dual mobility components confer increased stability, but there are concerns about the unique complications associated with these designs, as well as the long-term survivorship. Materials and Methods We performed a systematic review of all English language articles dealing with dual mobility THAs published between 2007 and 2016 in the MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases. A total of 54 articles met inclusion criteria for the final analysis of primary and revision dual mobility THAs and dual mobility THAs used in the treatment of fractures of the femoral neck. We analysed the survivorship and rates of aseptic loosening and of intraprosthetic and extra-articular dislocation. Results For the 10 783 primary dual mobility THAs, the incidence of aseptic loosening was 1.3% (142 hips); the rate of intraprosthetic dislocation was 1.1% (122 hips) and the incidence of extra-articular dislocation was 0.46% (41 hips). The overall survivorship of the acetabular component and the dual mobility components was 98.0%, with all-cause revision as the endpoint at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (2 to 16.5). For the 3008 revision dual mobility THAs, the rate of aseptic acetabular loosening was 1.4% (29 hips); the rate of intraprosthetic dislocation was 0.3% (eight hips) and the rate of extra-articular dislocation was 2.2% (67 hips). The survivorship of the acatabular and dual mobility components was 96.6% at a mean of 5.4 years (2 to 8). For the 554 dual mobility THAs which were undertaken in patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, the rate of intraprosthetic dislocation was 0.18% (one hip), the rate of extra-articular dislocation was 2.3% (13 hips) and there was one aseptic loosening. The survivorship was 97.8% at a mean of 1.3 years (0.75 to 2). Conclusion Dual mobility articulations are a viable alternative to traditional bearing surfaces, with low rates of instability and good overall survivorship in primary and revision THAs, and in those undertaken in patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. The incidence of intraprosthetic dislocation is low and limited mainly to earlier designs. High-quality, prospective, comparative studies are needed to evaluate further the use of dual mobility components in THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:11–19.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Schirmers, MD ◽  
Ryan Horazdovsky, MD ◽  
Scott Marston, MD

Introduced in 1974 by Bousquet, the dual-mobility bearing for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) confers increased jump distance and improved overall stability relative to conventional THA designs [1-3]. The dual-mobility bearing incorporates a relatively small (22-28mm) metal or ceramic femoral head press fit into a larger polyethylene liner which articulates with the acetabular component. Dissociation of the femoral head from the polyethylene liner (intraprosthetic dislocation) is a known late complication thought to be related to polyethylene liner wear and has been previously reported [2-7]. In a consecutive series of 384 primary THAs employing Bousquet’s original design, there were 14 intraprosthetic dislocations over 15 years (3.6%). The authors cited polyethylene wear as causative and mean time to intraprosthetic dislocation was 8.9 years [2].


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 2733-2733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Neri ◽  
Bertrand Boyer ◽  
Jean Geringer ◽  
Alexandre Di Iorio ◽  
Jacques H. Caton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan R Sekeitto ◽  
Kaeriann van der Jagt ◽  
Nkhodiseni Sikhauli ◽  
Lipalo Mokete ◽  
Dick R van der Jagt

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The dual mobility cup (DMC) was initially design in 1974. It was designed to offer additional stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to prevent dislocations. The dissociation of a DMC has been termed an intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD) and is a rare complication. It is defined as separation of the articulation between the polyethylene and head articulation in the DMC. As the utilisation of DMCs in orthopaedic surgery increases, we can expect an increase in this rare complication. We report a case of an IPD in the setting of revision hip arthroplasty in a 72-year-old female. CASE REPORT: The report is on a 72-year-old female patient who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. The articulation utilised was of the dual mobility type. Some eight months later she dislocated her hip. An attempted closed reduction under general anaesthesia with muscle relaxant was unsuccessful. Thereafter she was taken to surgery to perform an open reduction of the hip. Intra-operatively it was found that the dual mobility head had dissociated, with the polyethylene component remaining in the metal liner. A revision of the components was performed. DISCUSSION: We postulate on the mechanisms of dissociation of the dual mobility head. We review the current literature related to IPD and discuss the risk factors associated with this rare complication. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of IPD is an indication for revision surgery of the DMC. When utilising a DMC, care should be taken to mitigate against the known risk factors for IPD. All dual mobility dislocations should be reduced under general anaesthesia with muscle relaxant Level of evidence: Level 4.. Keywords: intraprosthetic dislocation, dual mobility cup, revision hip arthroplasty


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Yale A. Fillingham ◽  
Craig J. Della Valle ◽  
Scott M. Sporer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document