scholarly journals Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal Sleeves without Stem: Short-Term Results

Joints ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 207-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Stefani ◽  
Valerio Mattiuzzo ◽  
Greta Prestini

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cementless metaphyseal sleeves without stems either in the femoral or tibial side or in both. Methods In this retrospective study, 51 patients (51 knees) operated in the period 2010 to 2015 met the above-mentioned criteria and were invited to a medical examination including X-rays. Forty-six were available for the study. Mean follow-up was 37 months. Knee Society score (KSS) (objective knee score), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and range of motion (ROM) were used as outcome scores and compared with baseline values. X-rays were also examined and compared with postoperative exams to evaluate the presence of loosening, radiolucent lines, and bone ingrowth. Satisfaction of the patients was also investigated using a linear scale from 1 to 10. Results KSS improved from 39 to 77 (p < 0.01); WOMAC score improved from 76 to 41 (p < 0.01). Twenty-four (52%) patients were satisfied, 15 (32%) were partially satisfied, and 7 (16%) were unsatisfied. ROM improved from 93 to 96 degrees (nonsignificant difference). X-rays showed no loosening of the implants, radiolucent lines in 4 patients (3 of them were asymptomatic) and bone ingrowth in 43 out of 46 patients. Conclusion In this short-term retrospective study, the use of sleeves without stem was a safe and effective procedure in revision TKA. We found a significant improvement in clinical results compared with baseline values and no signs of implant loosening. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Joints ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Stefani ◽  
Valerio Mattiuzzo ◽  
Greta Prestini ◽  
Carolina Civitenga ◽  
Roberto Calafiore ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy in terms of clinical results and radiographic findings of using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to check if the use of sleeves without stems did not impair such results. Methods In this retrospective study, 141 patients (143 knees) operated in the period 2008 to 2015 met the above-mentioned criteria and were invited to a medical examination including X-rays. A total of 121 knees were available for the study (44 in the group without stems and 77 in the group with stems). Mean follow-up was 63 months for the stemless group and 89 for the group with stems. Knee Society Score (KSS) (objective knee score) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used as outcome scores and compared with baseline values, range of motion (ROM) was also compared with preop value and X-rays were also examined and compared with immediate postop X-rays to check signs of loosening and radiolucent lines, if any, and bone ingrowth. Satisfaction of the patients was also investigated using a linear scale from 1 to 10. Results KSS improved from 34 to 81 postop (39 to 81 in the stemless group) (p < 0.01), while WOMAC from 82% preop to 39% postop (76 to 37% in the stemless group) (p < 0.01). Forty-six patients were satisfied, 20 partially satisfied, and 11 unsatisfied (respectively 25–14–5 in the stemless group). ROM improved from 89 degrees preop to 99 degrees postop (93 to 98 degrees in the stemless group). X-rays showed no loosening of the implant, radiolucent lines in 8 patients, and bone ingrowth in 113 out of 121 patients. Conclusion In this midterm follow-up study, we found a significant improvement in clinical results compared with preop values. We found no difference between the two groups (with and without stems) thus suggesting that the use of stemless sleeves does not impair results in revision TKA. Level of Evidence Therapeutic case series, level IV.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 988-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Villanueva-Martínez ◽  
Basilio De la Torre-Escudero ◽  
José M. Rojo-Manaute ◽  
Antonio Ríos-Luna ◽  
Francisco Chana-Rodriguez

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2163-2166 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Dieterich ◽  
Adam C. Fields ◽  
Calin S. Moucha

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1219-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Barnett ◽  
Ryan R. Mayer ◽  
Joseph S. Gondusky ◽  
Leera Choi ◽  
Jay J. Patel ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A. Remily ◽  
Iciar M. Dávila Castrodad ◽  
Nequesha S. Mohamed ◽  
Wayne A. Wilkie ◽  
Margaret N. Kelemen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ansari Muqtadeer Abdul Aziz ◽  
Nair Pradeepkumar Sasidharan ◽  
Punit S. Malpani

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using posterior cruciate stabilizing (PS) design in tertiary rural government hospital with limited infrastructure using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and to offer a low cost option and assess post-operative pain relief in rural poor of the society and to compare the WOMAC score pre and post-operatively.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study was conducted on patients who have undergone primary total knee arthroplasty in Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad from December 2018 to December 2019. The patients were assessed using the WOMAC score and X-rays. These evaluations were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months follow up visits.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> At 1 year follow up of 30 knees, the average pre-op WOMAC score of 79.5 improved to an average post-op score of 42.3. And knee flexion increased from 96.3 degree to 108.5 degrees both of which with a p value &lt;0.0001 are statistically significant. One patient each had wound dehiscence and superficial infection. Patient satisfaction after the procedure was good-both in unilateral and staged bilateral TKA.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> TKA reduces knee pain significantly and improves the functional ability of the patient. And to be able to do so in a tertiary government rural setup with no laminar airflow and with such great efficacy and minimal complications bodes well for the number of people living in rural areas suffering from knee pain.</p>


Orthopedics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. e804-e809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Huang ◽  
Gustavo Barrazueta ◽  
Alvin Ong ◽  
Fabio Orozco ◽  
Mehdi Jafari ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (02) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
Shang-Wen Tsai ◽  
Cheng-Fong Chen ◽  
Po-Kuei Wu ◽  
Chao-Ming Chen ◽  
Wei-Ming Chen

AbstractIntraoperative assessment of valgus–varus stability is crucial for choosing articular surfaces with different levels of constraint. Legacy constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses are readily available to assemble and use with a CCK articular surface or a posterior stabilized (PS) articular surface in revision knee arthroplasty surgeries. We wanted to validate outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using legacy CCK prostheses combined with a PS articular surface. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and followed up for more than 2 years. Range of motion (ROM), the Knee Society score (KSS), the Knee Society functional score (KSS-F), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to evaluate outcomes. Follow-up was a mean of 86.5 months (range: 28–152 months). The mean age of the participants was 69.8 years (range: 31–86 years). The mean ROM was 110.5 degrees, the KSS was 86.2 points, the KSS-F was 68.3 points, and the WOMAC score was 22.6 points. Seven participants had implant failures: five because of delayed infections and two because of posterior dislocations. In conclusion, revision TKA using a CCK prosthesis combined with a PS articular surface might provide satisfactory mid-term outcomes. Delayed infection was the most common cause of implant failure. Dislocation might occur in middle-old or older patients despite careful intraoperative examination of valgus–varus stability, extension–flexion gap balancing, and signs of recurvatum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document