scholarly journals Malignant Venous Obstruction: Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Beyond

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (04) ◽  
pp. 398-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamir Friedman ◽  
Keith Quencer ◽  
Sirish Kishore ◽  
Ronald Winokur ◽  
David Madoff

AbstractVenous obstruction in the cancer population can result in substantial morbidity and, in extreme cases, mortality. While venous obstruction can be caused by both benign and malignant etiologies in this population, the management of malignant venous obstruction as a palliative measure can be somewhat nuanced with respect to nonprocedural and procedural management, both with respect to treatment of the underlying malignancy as well as treatment of venous hypertension, which may be associated with venous thrombosis. Symptom severity, primary malignancy, functional status, and prognosis are all fundamental to the patient workup and dictate both the timing and extent of endovascular intervention. The morbidity and mortality associated with malignant obstructions of central venous structures, specifically the superior vena cava and inferior vena cava, can be significantly improved with endovascular management in appropriately selected patients. Thus, the pertinent literature regarding the clinical presentation, workup, and endovascular management of malignant central venous obstruction syndromes, with directed attention to superior vena cava syndrome and inferior vena cava syndrome, will be reviewed in this article.

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-416
Author(s):  
G. M. Galstyan ◽  
M. V. Spirin ◽  
M. Yu. Drokov ◽  
I. E. Kostina ◽  
Ya. K. Mangasarova

Background. In the superior vena cava syndrome, vein catheterisation provides an alternative for vascular access. Few reports describe the usage of femoral ports.Aim. Description of pros and contras for femoral port installation in patients with haematological malignancies and the superior vena cava syndrome.Materials and methods. This prospective non-randomised, single-centre study included 163 haematological patients implanted 72 ports in superior vena cava, 35 — in inferior vena cava and inserted with 156 non-tunnelled femoral catheters. Catheterisation properties, complications, duration of use and reasons for port and catheter removal were registered.Results. No significant differences were observed between ports in superior and inferior vena cava as per the frequency of urokinase use in catheter dysfunction, catheter dislocation, catheter-associated bloodstream and pocket infections. Differences were revealed in the catheter-associated thrombosis rate, which was higher with femoral access (17.0 % or 0.9/1000 catheter days vs. 8.3 % or 0.2/1000 catheter days, p = 0.017). Ports in inferior vena cava had a lesser duration of use than in superior vena cava (p = 0.0001). Unlike femoral ports, non-tunnelled femoral catheters had higher rates of catheter-associated thrombosis (9/1000 vs. 0.9/1000 catheter days, p = 0.002) and infection (4.9/1000 vs. 0.3/1000 catheter days, p = 0.002). One lymphoma therapy course required one femoral port or 1 to 14 (median 3) non-tunnelled femoral catheters.Conclusion. Femoral port implantation is a necessary measure in patients with the superior vena cava syndrome. It has advantages in terms of catheterisation frequency, lower infectious and thrombotic complication rates compared to non-tunnelled femoral catheters.


CJEM ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (04) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep K. Aggarwal ◽  
William McCauley

ABSTRACTThrombotic venous obstruction in patients with a tunnelled central venous catheter is a cause of superior vena cava syndrome that is not routinely encountered by emergency physicians. Diagnosis requires identifying patients at risk (e.g., those under treatment for cancer and those who have a tunnelled central venous catheter), recognizing the signs and symptoms of superior vena cava syndrome, usually dyspnea and dilated neck or thoracic veins, and imaging the venous obstruction using computer tomography or sonography. Management involves anticoagulation and local thrombolytic administration. We report the case of a 28-year-old woman who presented with a 2-day history of face, chest and bilateral arm swelling who had been receiving maintenance chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia through a Hickman® catheter. This case demonstrates the need to be vigilant for thrombus formation in patients with long-term, indwelling central venous catheters.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (jan27 2) ◽  
pp. bcr2014206643-bcr2014206643 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Santos ◽  
A. M. Fernandes ◽  
V. Figueiredo ◽  
S. Janeiro

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Guijarro Escribano ◽  
R. F. Antón ◽  
A. Colmenarejo Rubio ◽  
L. Sáenz Cascos ◽  
F. Sainz González ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document