scholarly journals The Effect of Medial Tibial Slope on Anterior Tibial Translation and Short-Term ACL Reconstruction Outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. e160-e163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Sauer ◽  
Mark Clatworthy
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Medial Tibial Slope ◽  
Acl Deficient

Background Increased tibial slope has been shown to be associated with higher anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure rate. Little is known about the correlation of tibial slope and anterior tibial translation in ACL deficient and reconstructed knees as well as the correlation of tibial slope and ACL reconstruction outcome. Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of tibial slope with anterior tibial translation and ACL reconstruction outcome. It is hypothesized that increased medial tibial slope is associated with increased anterior tibial translation in the ACL deficient knee. Medial tibial slope is neither expected to affect anterior tibial translation in the ACL reconstructed knee nor short-term ACL reconstruction outcome. Materials and Methods A cohort of 104 patients with unilateral isolated ACL deficiency undergoing hamstring ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2004 was followed up prospectively. Preoperative data were collected including patient demographics, time to surgery, subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome scores, as well as manual maximum anterior tibial translation measured with the KT-1000 measuring instrument. Medial tibial slope was assessed on long lateral X-rays using the method described by Dejour and Bonnin (1994). Intraoperative data were collected including meniscal integrity; postoperative data were collected at 1-year follow-up including manual maximum anterior tibial translation (KT-1000 measured), and subjective and objective IKDC scores. Results A significant positive correlation was seen between medial tibial slope in ACL deficient knees and KT-1000–measured anterior tibial translation (r = 0.24; p = 0.003). The positive relationship increased when meniscal integrity was factored in (r = 0.33; p < 0.001). No significant correlation was seen between medial or lateral meniscal integrity and KT-1000–measured anterior tibial translation (r = −18; p = 0.06). No significant correlation was seen between KT-1000–measured anterior tibial translation and time to surgery. One year postoperatively, 82 patients were assessed, while 26 patients were lost to follow-up; no significant correlation was found between increased medial tibial slope and poor ACL reconstruction outcome measured by post-ACL reconstruction anterior tibial translation (KT-1000) or subjective and objective IKDC scores. Conclusion Increased medial tibial slope is associated with increased (KT-1000 measured) anterior tibial translation in ACL deficient knees. No significant correlation is found between increased medial tibial slope and poor short-term ACL reconstruction outcome.

Greater medial tibial slope is associated with increased anterior tibial translation in females with an ACL-deficient knee

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1901-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Schneider ◽  
Claudia Arias ◽  
Chris Bankhead ◽  
Romain Gaillard ◽  
Sebastien Lustig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Medial Tibial Slope ◽  
Acl Deficient ◽  
Deficient Knee

scholarly journals Clinical and radiological results after Internal Brace suture versus the all-inside reconstruction technique in anterior cruciate ligament tears 12 to 18 months after index surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Mattiassich ◽  
Reinhold Ortmaier ◽  
Harald Kindermann ◽  
Jürgen Barthofer ◽  
Imre Vasvary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
German Version ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Internal Brace ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation

Abstract Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can lead to reduced function, meniscal lesions, and early joint degeneration. Preservation of a torn ACL using the Internal Brace technique might re-establish normal knee kinematics, avoid donor-site morbidity due to tendon harvesting, and potentially maintain proprioception of the knee. Methods Fifty subjects were recruited for this study between December 2015 and October 2016. Two groups of individuals who sustained a unilateral ACL rupture were included: those who underwent surgery with preservation of the injured ACL (Internal Brace technique; IB) and those who underwent ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft (all-inside technique; AI). Subjective self-administered scores were used: the German version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form (International Knee Documentation Committee), the German version of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index), SF-36 (short form), the German version of the KOOS (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), and the German version of themodified Lysholm Score by Lysholm and Gillquist. Anterior tibial translation was assessed using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (KT-1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer, MEDmetric Corp., San Diego, CA, USA). Magnetic resonance evaluation was performed in all cases. Results Twenty-three subjects (46 %) were men, and the mean age was 34.7 years. The objective IKDC scores were “normal” in 15 and 14 patients, “nearly normal” in 11 and 7 patients, and “abnormal” in 1 and 2 patients, in the IB and AI groups, respectively. KT-1000 assessment showed a sideto-side difference of more than 3 mm on maximum manual testing in 11 (44 %) and 6 subjects (28.6 %) in the IB and AI groups, respectively. In the postoperative MRI, 20 (74 %) and 22 subjects (96 %) in the IB and AI groups had an intact ACL. Anterior tibial translation was significantly higher in the IB group compared with the AI group in the manual maximum test. Conclusions Preservation of the native ACL with the Internal Brace primary repair technique can achieve comparable results to ACL reconstruction using Hamstring autografts over a short term. Clinically relevant limitations such as a higher incidence of pathologic laxity, with patients more prone to pivot-shift phenomenon were observed during the study period.

Clinical and radiological results after Internal Brace ® suture versus the all-inside reconstruction technique in anterior cruciate ligament tears 12 to 18 months after index surgery.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Mattiassich ◽  
Reinhold Ortmaier ◽  
Harald Kindermann ◽  
Jürgen Barthofer ◽  
Imre Vasvary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
German Version ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Internal Brace ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation

Abstract Background Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can lead to reduced function, meniscal lesions, and early joint degeneration. Preservation of a torn ACL using the Internal Brace® technique might re-establish normal knee kinematics, avoid donor-site morbidity due to tendon harvesting, and potentially maintain proprioception of the knee. Methods Fifty subjects were recruited for this study between December 2015 and October 2016. Two groups of individuals who sustained unilateral ACL rupture were included: those who underwent surgery with preservation of the injured ACL (Internal Brace® technique; IB) and those who underwent ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft (all-inside technique; AI). Subjective self-administered scores were used: the German Version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form (International Knee Documentation Committee), the German Version of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index), SF-36 (short form), the German Version of the KOOS (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), and the German Version of the modified Lysholm-score by Lysholm and Gillquist. Anterior tibial translation was assessed using the KT-1000 arthrometer® (KT-1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer, MEDmetric Corp., San Diego, CA, USA). Magnetic resonance evaluation was performed in all cases. Results Twenty-three subjects (46%) were men, and the mean age was 34.7 years. The objective IKDC scores were “normal” in 15 and 14 patients, “nearly normal” in 11 and 7 patients, and “abnormal” in 1 and 2 patients, in the IB and AI groups, respectively. KT-1000 assessment showed a side-to-side difference of more than 3 mm on maximum manual testing in 11 (44%) and 6 subjects (28.6%) in the IB and AI groups, respectively. In the postoperative MRI, 20 (74%) and 22 subjects (96%) in the IB and AI groups showed an intact ACL. Anterior tibial translation was significantly higher in the IB group compared to the AI group in the manual maximum test. Conclusions Preservation of the native ACL with the Internal Brace ® primary repair technique can achieve comparable results to ACL reconstruction using Hamstring autografts over a short term. Clinically relevant limitations such as a higher incidence of pathologic laxity, with patients more prone to pivot shift phenomenon were observed during the study period.

scholarly journals Knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Cristiani ◽  
Sofia Viheriävaara ◽  
Per-Mats Janarv ◽  
Gunnar Edman ◽  
Magnus Forssblad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tibial Translation

Abstract Purpose To evaluate and compare knee laxity and functional knee outcome between primary and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Patients who underwent primary and subsequent contralateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2001 to 2017, were identified in our local database. The inclusion criteria were: the same patients who underwent primary and contralateral hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACLR and no associated ligament injuries. The KT-1000 arthrometer, with an anterior tibial load of 134 N, was used to evaluate knee laxity preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. Results A total of 326 patients with isolated primary and contralateral ACLR met the inclusion criteria (47.9% males; mean age at primary ACLR 23.9 ± 9.4 years and contralateral ACLR 27.9 ± 10.1 years). The arthrometric laxity measurements were available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 226 patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT), as well as the mean ATT reduction from preoperatively to postoperatively, did not differ significantly between primary and contralateral ACLR. The KOOS was available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 256 patients. No significant differences were found preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up between primary and contralateral ACLR for any of the five KOOS subscales. Conclusion The findings in this study showed that anterior knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR. It is important for clinicians to counsel patients about their expectations after contralateral ACLR. This study shows that the results after contralateral ACLR in terms of knee laxity and functional knee outcome are predictable and likely to be comparable to those after primary ACLR. Level of evidence Level III.

scholarly journals Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2077-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Magnussen ◽  
Emily K. Reinke ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Jack T. Andrish ◽  
Charles L. Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Rotational Knee Laxity

Background: While a primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational knee laxity, the relationship between knee laxity after ACL reconstruction and patient-reported knee function remains unclear. Hypothesis: There would be no significant correlation between the degree of residual anterior and rotational knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From a prospective multicenter nested cohort of patients, 433 patients younger than 36 years of age injured in sports with no history of concomitant ligament surgery, revision ACL surgery, or surgery of the contralateral knee were identified and evaluated at a minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Each patient underwent Lachman and pivot-shift evaluation as well as a KT-1000 arthrometer assessment along with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. A proportional odds logistic regression model was used to predict each 2-year PRO score, controlling for preoperative score, age, sex, body mass index, smoking, Marx activity score, education, subsequent surgery, meniscal and cartilage status, graft type, and range of motion asymmetry. Measures of knee laxity were independently added to each model to determine correlation with PROs. Results: Side-to-side manual Lachman differences were IKDC A in 246 (57%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 4 (<1%) patients. Pivot-shift was classified as IKDC A in 209 (48%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 11 (2.5%) patients. The mean side-to-side KT-1000 difference was 2.0 ± 2.6 mm. No significant correlations were noted between pivot-shift or anterior tibial translation as assessed by Lachman or KT-1000 and any PRO. All predicted differences in PROs based on IKDC A versus B pivot-shift and anterior tibial translation were less than 4 points. Conclusion: Neither the presence of IKDC A versus B pivot-shift nor increased anterior tibial translation of up to 6 mm is associated with clinically relevant decreases in PROs 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Effect of Meniscocapsular and Meniscotibial Lesions in ACL-Deficient and ACL-Reconstructed Knees: A Biomechanical Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2422-2431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
Gilbert Moatshe ◽  
Alex Brady ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Zachary S. Aman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Acl Deficient

Background: Ramp lesions were initially defined as a tear of the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus at the meniscocapsular junction. The separate biomechanical roles of the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments of the posterior medial meniscus have not been fully delineated. Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical effects of meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions of the posterior medial meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees and the effect of repair of ramp lesions. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were evaluated with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. All knees were subjected to an 88-N anterior tibial load, internal and external rotation torques of 5 N·m, and a simulated pivot-shift test of 10-N valgus force coupled with 5-N·m internal rotation. The paired knees were randomized to the cutting of either the meniscocapsular or the meniscotibial attachments after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Eight comparisons of interest were chosen before data analysis was conducted. Data from the intact state were compared with data from the subsequent states. The following states were tested: intact (n = 24), ACL deficient (n = 24), ACL deficient with a meniscocapsular lesion (n = 12), ACL deficient with a meniscotibial lesion (n = 12), ACL deficient with both meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions (n = 24), ACLR with both meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions (n = 16), and ACLR with repair of both meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions (n = 16). All states were compared with the previous states. For the repair and reconstruction states, only the specimens that underwent repair were compared with their intact and sectioned states, thus excluding the specimens that did not undergo repair. Results: Cutting the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus significantly increased anterior tibial translation in ACL-deficient knees at 30° ( P ≤ .020) and 90° ( P < .005). Cutting both the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments increased tibial internal (all P > .004) and external (all P < .001) rotation at all flexion angles in ACL-reconstructed knees. Reconstruction of the ACL in the presence of meniscocapsular and meniscotibial tears restored anterior tibial translation ( P > .053) but did not restore internal rotation ( P < .002), external rotation ( P < .002), and the pivot shift ( P < .05). To restore the pivot shift, an ACLR and a concurrent repair of the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions were both necessary. Repairing the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions after ACLR did not restore internal rotation and external rotation at angles >30°. Conclusion: Meniscocapsular and meniscotibial lesions of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus increased knee anterior tibial translation, internal and external rotation, and the pivot shift in ACL-deficient knees. The pivot shift was not restored with an isolated ACLR but was restored when performed concomitantly with a meniscocapsular and meniscotibial repair. However, the effect of this change was minimal; although statistical significance was found, the overall clinical significance remains unclear. The ramp lesion repair used in this study failed to restore internal rotation and external rotation at higher knee flexion angles. Further studies should examine improved meniscus repair techniques for root tears combined with ACLRs. Clinical Relevance: Meniscal ramp lesions should be repaired at the time of ACLR to avoid continued knee instability (anterior tibial translation) and to eliminate the pivot-shift phenomenon.

scholarly journals Slope reduction osteotomy decreases ACL graft forces and reduces anterior tibial translation under axial load - a biomechanical study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0021
Author(s):  
Florian B. Imhoff ◽  
Julian Mehl ◽  
Elifho Obopilwe ◽  
Andreas Imhoff ◽  
Knut Beitzel
Keyword(s):  
Axial Load ◽  
Wedge Osteotomy ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Anterior Drawer ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Closing Wedge Osteotomy ◽  
Closing Wedge ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Acl Deficient

Aims and Objectives: To perform an anterior closing wedge osteotomy by 10° for slope reduction and investigate the effect of axial load and anterior drawer on forces on ACL graft, strain and femoro-tibial kinematics in a native, ACL-deficient and reconstructed knee. Materials and Methods: Ten cadaveric knees with an increased native slope were selected for this study based on CT meas-urements. An anterior closing-wedge osteotomy was performed by 10° and fixed with an external fixator. Tibial axial load (200 N, 400 N) was applied, while the tibial side was mounted on a free mov-ing X-Y-table with open rotation in 30° of knee flexion. Additionally, an anterior drawer (134 N) was performed with and without axial load (200 N). Specimens underwent native testing, cut ACL, and reconstructed ACL with a standardized quadruple semi-t/gracilis-allograft. Each condition was ran-domly tested with native slope and reduced slope. Change of forces on ACL-graft (attached load-cell) and strain on native ACL (via DVRT) were recorded. Throughout testing, 3D motion tracking captured anterior tibial translation (ATT) and rotation versus the fixed femur. Results: Preoperative, specimens showed an averaged lateral and medial slope of (average ±SD) 10° ± 1.4°, and age 48.2 ± 5.8years. Slope reduction significantly decreased forces on ACL graft by 17% (p=0.001) at 200 N and by 33% (p=0.0001) at 400 N of axial load. Furthermore, ATT was significantly decreased after slope reduc-tion in native (p=0.01), cut (p=0.005), and ACL-graft (p=0.01) status. Strain in native ACL de-creased by 9.7 ± 0.13% (p<0.0001) after slope reduction without any load. However, anterior drawer without axial load maintained significantly higher anterior tibial translation (native-pre 4.12 ± 0.65 mm vs. native-post 5.82 ± 1.51 mm, cut-ACL-pre 9.35 ± 1.57 mm vs cut-ACL-post 12.0 ± 3.53 mm, ACL-recon-pre 4.60 ± 0.97 mm vs. ACL-recon-post 5.73 ± 1.45 mm) and significantly higher forces on ACL graft (p=0.0006) after osteotomy. When axial load was combined with anterior drawer no significant change on ATT after osteotomy was observed. Rotational analysis did show a significant effect in the ACL cut condition due to slope correction. Overall, native and reconstruct-ed ACL showed the same tibial kinematics throughout testing. Conclusion: In general, osteotomy lowered ACL graft force and ACL strain when the joint was axially loaded. Anterior tibial translation was reduced even in an ACL deficient knee. When anterior drawer was performed without axial load, ATT was higher after slope reduction in every condition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document