Is Standing Coronal Long-Leg Alignment View Effective in Predicting the Extent of Medial Soft Tissue Release in Varus Deformity during Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Okhovatpour ◽  
Yaser Safaei ◽  
Behrooz Faramarzi ◽  
Reza Zandi

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of the femoral intermechanical-anatomical angle (IMA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), femorotibial or varus angle (VA), and joint line convergence angle (CA) in predicting the stage of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of varus knee. We evaluated 229 patients with osteoarthritic varus knee who underwent primary TKA, prospectively. They were categorized in three groups based on the extent of medial soft tissue release that performed during TKA Group 1, osteophytes removal and release of the deep MCL and posteromedial capsule (stage 1); Group 2, the release of the semimembranosus (stage 2); and Group 3, release of the superficial MCL (stage 3) and/or the pes anserinus (stage 4). We evaluated the preoperative standing coronal hip-knee-ankle alignment view to assessing the possible correlations between the knee angles and extent of soft tissue release. A significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of preoperative VA, CA, and MPTA by using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The extent of medial release increased with increasing VA and CA as well as decreasing MPTA in preoperative long-leg standing radiographs. Finally, a patient with a preoperative VA larger than 19, CA larger than 6, or MPTA smaller than 81 would need a stage 3 or 4 of MCL release. The overall results showed that the VA and MPTA could be useful in predicting the extent of medial soft tissue release during TKA of varus knee.

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902110020
Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate the integrity of lateral soft tissue in varus osteoarthritis knee by comparing the mechanical axis under varus stress during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty before and after compensating for a bone defect with the implant. Methods: Sixty-six knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty were investigated. The mechanical axis of the operated knee was evaluated under manual varus stress immediately after knee exposure and after navigation-assisted implantation. The correlation between each value of the mechanical axis and degree of preoperative varus deformity was compared by regression analysis. Results: The maximum mechanical axis under varus stress immediately after knee exposure increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Moreover, the maximum mechanical axis under varus stress after implantation increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Therefore, the severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, regression coefficients after implantation were much smaller than those measured immediately after knee exposure (0.99 vs 0.20). Based on the results of the regression formula, the postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue was negligible, provided that an appropriate thickness of the implant was compensated for the bone and cartilage defect in the medial compartment without changing the joint line. Conclusion: The severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, even if the degree of preoperative varus deformity is severe, most cases may not require additional procedures to address the residual lateral laxity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1465-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaveh Goudarz Mehdikhani ◽  
Beatriz Morales Moreno ◽  
Jeremy J. Reid ◽  
Ana de Paz Nieves ◽  
Yuo-Yu Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

AbstractWe assessed the impact of a minimal medial soft-tissue release with complete peripheral osteophyte removal on the ability to attain manual preresection deformity correction during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus osteoarthritis. We included 131 TKAs for 109 patients with medial compartment predominant osteoarthritis. The steps for achieving minimal medial soft-tissue release were performed as follows: (1) elevation of a periosteal sleeve to 5-mm distal to the joint line and (2) complete removal of peripheral osteophytes. The evaluation criteria of this study were as follows: (1) age, (2) height, (3) weight, (4) body mass index (BMI), (5) sex, (6) the preoperative femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and (7) the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress after the two-step medial-release procedure (measured on the navigation screens). Multiple regression analysis of the criteria was performed to determine the degree of varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment but required extensive medial release. The femorotibial mechanical angle in the neutral position before medial release and sex correlated with the mechanical angle in maximum manual valgus stress on the navigation screen after medial release (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Based on the regression formula, the maximum degree of preoperative varus deformity that allowed neutral alignment by the minimum medial-release procedure was 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females. The magnitude of deformity which has an impact on the ability to correct varus deformity (by minimal soft-tissue release and complete osteophyte removal) was clarified. If the preoperative degree of varus deformity was within 5.3 degrees for males and 9.1 degrees for females, an extensive medial release was not required to obtain neutral alignment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Omid Shahpari ◽  
◽  
Abolfazl Bagherifard ◽  
Mahmoud Jabalameli ◽  
Mohammad Rahbar ◽  
...  

Background: The preoperative identification of patients who might need constrained condylar knee (CCK) prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), is essential to ensure the availability of equipment and to address the patients’ expectations accurately. Objectives: In this study, we aimed at investigating if the preoperative features of the patients can provide this data. Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent primary TKA for severe osteoarthritic genu varum deformity (varus angle ≥20º) were evaluated in this retrospective study. Prosthesis selection was based on preoperative and intraoperative information. Demographic data, preoperative correctability of the deformity, and intraoperative information, including the reduction osteotomy, soft-tissue release, and pie-crust technique, were retrospectively collected. Soft-tissue release was performed in a sequential manner in 3 steps. Results: The study population included 4 males and 26 females with a mean±SD age of 64.6±8.7 years. A CCK prosthesis was used in 11 (36.7%) cases. A significant association was found between the preoperative correctability and the type of prosthesis. In other words, all CCK prostheses were used in patients who were preoperatively non-correctable (P<0.001). Also, the step of release was significantly associated with the type of prosthesis, and CCK prosthesis was used in all patients with step 3 release (P<0.001). Preoperative correctability was significantly related to the step of release, as well. It means that all deformities with step 3 release were preoperatively non-correctable (P=0.008). Conclusion: The preoperative clinical evaluation of correctability could be used in the identification of patients who might need a CCK prosthesis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2525-2531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Boettner ◽  
Lisa Renner ◽  
Danik Arana Narbarte ◽  
Claus Egidy ◽  
Martin Faschingbauer

Author(s):  
Fardin Mirzatolooei ◽  
Ali Tabrizi ◽  
Hassan Taleb ◽  
Mohammad Khalegi Hashemian ◽  
Mir Bahram Safari

Background Total knee arthroplasty is a challenging task in patients with severe varus deformity. In most of these patients, an extensive medial release is needed that may lead to instability. Medial epicondylar osteotomy may be a better substitute for complete medial collateral release. Materials and Methods Fourteen patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and severe varus deformity were enrolled in this study. In one side, the patients underwent medial epicondylar osteotomy for mediolateral imbalance if the only option was superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) release. In contralateral side, the extensive medial release was performed and MCL was released either by pie-crusting technique or by subperiosteally release. The results of the two sides were compared. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the operation. Physical examination, clinical questionnaires, and radiography findings were recorded. Union of the osteotomies fragment and complications was evaluated. Results The mean varus angle before surgery was 21.6 ± 4.7 degrees, which was corrected to 8.6 ± 2.9 degrees after operation with an extensive medial release. The mean varus angle of contralateral side was 22.6 ± 1.7 degrees, which was corrected to 7.5 ± 2.3 degrees following medial femoral epicondyle osteotomy. There was no significant difference in varus correction (p = 0.1). Medial joint line opening in valgus stress test was 2.7 ± 0.4 mm in the osteotomized side and 3.5 ± 0.9 mm in contralateral side. Mean range of motion for the osteotomized side was 97.8 ± 4.3 degrees and 100.7 ± 2.7 degrees for contralateral side (p = 0.6). Nonunion occurred in a case in the osteotomized side and no medial instability was observed in medial release or osteotomies sides. No statistical difference was recorded based on clinical questionnaires (Oxford and WOMAC [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index] scores). Conclusion Medial epicondylar osteotomy is a safe technique with the well-controlled medial extensive release in the patients with severe varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andri M. T. Lubis ◽  
Rangga B. V. Rawung ◽  
Aida R. Tantri

Acute pain is the most common early complication after total knee arthroplasty causing delayed mobilization and increased demands of morphine, leading to higher operative cost. Several studies have assessed the effectiveness, side-effects, and ease of use of various analgesics. Preemptive analgesia with combined celecoxib and pregabalin has been reported to yield positive outcomes. In this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, 30 subjects underwent surgery for total knee arthroplasty using 15-20mg bupivacaine 5% epidural anesthesia. All subjects were divided into three groups. Group 1 was given celecoxib 400mg and pregabalin 150mg 1 hour before the operation, Group 2 was given celecoxib 200mg and pregabalin 75mg twice daily starting from 3 days before the operation, and Group 3 was given a placebo. The outcome was measured with Visual Analog Scale, knee range of motion, and postoperative mobilization. There was a significant difference in postoperative morphine usage between the groups that were administered with preemptive analgesia and the placebo group, but no significant difference was found between Group 1 and Group 2 that were given preemptive analgesia at different doses. ROM and postoperative mobilization were not significantly different among the three groups. Two patients in the first group, one patient in the second group, and one patient in the third group developed nausea. Preemptive analgesia is proven to reduce postoperative usage of morphine independent of the dosage. We recommend the use of combined celecoxib and pregabalin as preemptive analgesia after the total knee arthroplasty procedure. This trial is registered with NCT03523832 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document