scholarly journals Esophageal Motility Disorders: Are We Missing in Our Busy Endoscopy Practice?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 196-201
Author(s):  
Anshuman Elhence ◽  
Uday C. Ghoshal

AbstractEsophageal motility disorders (EMDs) form a significant part of a busy endoscopist's practice. Endoscopy plays an all-encompassing role in the diagnosis and management of EMDs including achalasia cardia. The focus on in-vogue third-space endoscopic procedures such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy often digresses the important role of endoscopy. Endoscopic evaluation forms the part of standard first-line evaluation of any dysphagia and serves to rule out a secondary cause such as an esophagogastric junction malignancy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Moreover, endoscopic evaluation may itself provide corroborative evidence that may contribute to the diagnosis of the motility disorder. Achalasia cardia may present with a wide spectrum of endoscopic findings from being entirely normal and the well-known and pathognomonic dilated sigmoid-shaped esophagus with food residue, to lesser-known ornate signs. The evidence on the role of endosonography in EMDs is conflicting and largely restricted to evaluation of pseudoachalasia. High-resolution manometry (HRM) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of EMDs. Endoscopists must also keep abreast of the latest iteration of the Chicago classification version 4.0, which differs significantly from its predecessor in being more stringent in making diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and disorders of peristalsis since these manometric findings may be seen in normal individuals and may be mimicked by opioid use and gastroesophageal reflux. The latest rendition also includes the use of provocative maneuvers and testing in both supine and sitting posture. Despite being the gold standard, there are certain lacunae in the use and interpretation of the Chicago classification of which the users should be well aware. Emerging technologies such as functional lumen imaging probe and planimetry, and timed barium esophagogram fill the lacuna in diagnosis of these motility disorders, which at times is beyond the resolution of HRM.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Noriaki Manabe ◽  
Ken Haruma ◽  
Rui Nakato ◽  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
Takahisa Murao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although dysphagia is an indication for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) its causes include organic and non-organic disorders. There has been no study to investigate the clinical significance of EGD in patients with esophageal motility disorders (EMD). The first aim was to elucidate the detection ratio for EMD with EGD. The second aim was to clarify useful EGD parameters associated with them. Methods Participants included 372 patients who underwent EGD before high resolution manometry for dysphagia. EGD findings were investigated according to the following five parameters: resistance when passing through the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), residue in the esophageal lumen, esophageal dilation, spastic and non-occlusive contraction. The EGD finding was positive when at least one EGD finding was detected. HRM diagnoses were made based on the Chicago classification (v3.0). Results Of 372 participants, pseudoachalasia were diagnosed in 6 patients (1.61%), EMD in 250, and normal in 116. The detection ratio for each EMD by EGD is shown in Table 1. There were significant differences in the detection ratio among the three groups (81.1% in major, 50.0% in minor EMD and 15.5% in normal, P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, resistance when passing through the EGJ (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.99; 95% CI [1.26–12.66]), and non-occlusive contraction (aOR: 10.3; 95% CI [5.26–20.19]) were significantly associated with EMD. Conclusion The ratio of abnormal EGD findings was different in each EMD. Major EMD can be screened with EGD. Among several endoscopic parameters related with EMD, the non-occlusive contraction is most useful endoscopic parameter. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Augusto Herbella ◽  
Priscila Rodrigues Armijo ◽  
Marco Giuseppe Patti

ABSTRACT High resolution manometry changed several esophageal motility paradigms. The 3.0 Chicago Classification defined manometric criteria for named esophageal motility disorders. We present a pictorial atlas of motility disorders. Achalasia types, esophagogastric junction obstruction, absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer), ineffective esophageal motility, and fragmented peristalsis are depicted with high-resolution manometry plots.


2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-138
Author(s):  
Martin Ďuriček ◽  
Peter Bánovčin ◽  
Rudolf Hyrdel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document