Hearing Preservation: Patient Expectation vs. Scientific Outcomes

Skull Base ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Witold Szyfter
Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Haines ◽  
Samuel Levine ◽  
Scott Turner

Skull Base ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Biroli ◽  
Antonio Mazzoni ◽  
Camillo Foresti ◽  
Antonio Signorelli

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam U. Mehta ◽  
Gregory P. Lekovic

Although most widely known as the birthplace of neuro-otology, the House Clinic in Los Angeles has been the site of several major contributions to the field of neurosurgery. From the beginning of the formation of the Otologic Medical Group in 1958 (later renamed the House Ear Clinic), these contributions have been largely due to the innovative and collaborative work of neurosurgeon William E. Hitselberger, MD, and neuro-otologist William F. House, MD, DDS. Together they were responsible for the development and widespread adoption of the team approach to skull-base surgery. Specific neurosurgical advances accomplished at the House Clinic have included the first application of the operative microscope to neurosurgery, the application of middle fossa and translabyrinthine approaches for vestibular schwannoma, and the development of combined petrosal, retrolabyrinthine, and other alternative petrosal approaches and of hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. The auditory brainstem implant, invented at the House Clinic in 1979, was the first ever successful application of central nervous system neuromodulation for restoration of function. Technological innovations at the House Clinic have also advanced neurosurgery. These include the first video transmission of microsurgery, the first suction irrigator, the first debulking instrument for tumors, and the House-Urban retractor for middle fossa surgery.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Walia ◽  
Matthew A. Shew ◽  
Amanda J. Ortmann ◽  
Craig A. Buchman ◽  
Jacques A. Herzog

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Chiuta ◽  
S Raza-Knight ◽  
A Alalade

Abstract Introduction Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumours originating from the vestibular division of the eighth cranial nerve. The mainstay of their surgical management is microsurgery, other options are radiotherapy or radiological monitoring. Endoscopy (ES) is becoming widely used in neurosurgery and may have a role in improving visualisation and outcomes by enhancing extent of resection, facial nerve, and hearing preservation in VS resection and describe the postoperative outcomes. Method The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and yielded 31 studies for inclusion. Systematic searches of literature databases were done for studies where endoscopic-assisted and/or endoscopic resection of VS were reported. Results ES facial nerve preservation rates (median 91.3%, range 39.0 - 100%) were comparable to microsurgical treatment. Hearing outcomes were more variable in ES series and were under-reported. A median gross total resection rate of 97.4% (61.0 - 100%) was achieved in the ES series. Conclusions Current data suggest that ES-assisted resection of sporadic VS is not inferior to microsurgical resection with respect to facial nerve outcomes and extent of resection. However, some ES series report poor hearing outcomes, which are under-reported in the literature.


1997 ◽  
Vol 107 (8) ◽  
pp. 1043-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moisés A. Arriaga ◽  
Douglas A. Chen ◽  
Takanori Fukushima

Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Diaz Day ◽  
Douglas A. Chen ◽  
Moises Arriaga

Abstract THE TRANSLABYRINTHINE APPROACH has been popularized during the past 30 years for the surgical treatment of acoustic neuromas. It serves as an alternative to the retrosigmoid approach in patients when hearing preservation is not a primary consideration. Patients with a tumor of any size may be treated by the translabyrinthine approach. The corridor of access to the cerebellopontine angle is shifted anteriorly in contrast to the retrosigmoid approach, resulting in minimized retraction of the cerebellum. Successful use of the approach relies on a number of technical nuances that are outlined in this article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document