Opportunities and Limitations of Computer-Aided Surgical Reconstruction after Complex Facial Burn Injuries

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laszlo Kovacs ◽  
Nikolaos Papadopulos ◽  
Markus Kloeppel ◽  
Katja Schwenzer ◽  
H. Seitz ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 1281 ◽  
pp. 504-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Kovacs ◽  
A. Zimmermann ◽  
H. Wawrzyn ◽  
K. Schwenzer ◽  
H. Seitz ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Kovacs ◽  
A. Zimmermann ◽  
H. Wawrzyn ◽  
K. Schwenzer ◽  
H. Seitz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S118-S119
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E Carter ◽  
Herbert Phelan ◽  
Nicole M Kopari ◽  
Steven Kahn ◽  
Joseph Molnar ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Optimal management of facial burn injuries remains a significant challenge in burn care. Acute surgical intervention is often coupled with delayed reconstructive procedures as an essential option for burn care. Experience with new surgical technologies could challenge historic reconstructive ladders. Our goal was to pragmatically assess the rate of successful intervention with autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) for the treatment of facial burn injuries from real-world data. Methods A retrospective review from five burn centers over a three-year period was performed from deidentified registry data for facial burn injuries initially treated with ASCS. Cases of non-acute thermal burn and burns not involving the face were excluded. Data collection included: date of surgery, last follow-up date, need for grafting (split or full thickness skin graft, STSG or FTSG, respectively) or reapplication of ASCS within the same hospitalization, and reconstruction not including laser procedures due to scarring during the follow-up period. Descriptive statistics were calculated and data are reported as median with interquartile ranges where appropriate. Results A total of 72 burn injuries were treated with ASCS for facial burn injuries. Two burn centers treated 4 patients each, one treated 18, and the remaining two treated 22 and 24 patients. The median follow-up was 199 days (range 9 -1,150 days). Acute failure requiring a second treatment with ASCS or application of a full-thickness or split-thickness autograft occurred in 12 (16%) of the patients with 5 undergoing re-application of ASCS and 7 undergoing FTSG or STSG. reconstruction secondary to scarring during the follow-up period occurred in 10 (14%) of patients. Reconstruction was required in 1 of 5 patients that underwent a second treatment with ASCS as opposed to 4 of 5 patients treated with FTSG or STSG. Conclusions This study represents the largest experience with the use of ASCS for the management of facial burn injury in the reported literature. Use of ASCS from real-world data indicated that ASCS successfully resulted in definitive wound closure in 90% of the patients treated with facial burn injuries, with 10% requiring secondary intervention. This failure rate is below the previously published rate of 33%, indicating the disruptive potential of this technology for the management of facial burn injuries.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily B. Ridgway ◽  
James B. Cowan ◽  
Matthias B. Donelan ◽  
Daniel N. Driscoll

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran As’adi ◽  
Seyed Hamid Salehi ◽  
Saeed Shoar ◽  
Seyed Jafar Hashemian ◽  
Masoud Moradi

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S164-S164
Author(s):  
Lisa LePage

Abstract Introduction With a severe facial burn, injury often involves the ear(s) resulting in damage or loss which may require reconstruction. In consideration of the functional and psychological effect that loss of a defined ear lobe may entail, reconstruction is an important consideration for the burn survivor. Two cases described in detail with illustration will highlight an auricular contracture release; one with V-Y Advancement and the other with a transposition flap. Preservation of the auricular reconstruction is accomplished by implementing necessary splinting. The auricular splint fabricated was made from a combination of silicone and low-temperature thermoplastic material. A step-by-step process will illustrate the needed materials and techniques to fabricate a worthy splint in order to preserve what was surgically achieved. The splint maintains the space between the ear and head to properly position and prevent contracture through the healing and scar maturation process. It secured with a one-inch head band that is sublime enough to foster compliance with wear. The auricular splint material also serves as scar management with the many proven benefits of silicone. Methods Two case studies are reviewed with auricular contractures that required release and reconstruction. The auricular splints were fabricated to stabilize and preserve the reconstructed ear lobe. The wear schedule was intermittent during the day and overnight in combination with scar massage. The patients reported good compliance with wear and stability of splint position with overnight wear. Skin integrity was not compromised with overnight or intermittent wear. The splint fabrication process is reviewed and illustrated with a simplistic innovative end result that is user friendly. Results Surgical reconstruction was required following development of auricular contractures and partial loss. With post-operative bandage removal and wound closure, positioning was a necessary consideration to preserve post-surgical reconstruction. Conclusions In conclusion, the peri-auricular splint is fabricated with low temperature splinting material lined in silicone proved worthy for effective positioning and reported comfort with wear. Effective splinting is necessary for the preservation of surgical reconstruction and to prevent contracture from sabotaging surgical efforts. Applicability of Research to Practice Consideration of fabrication of silicone auricular splints to preserve the accomplishments of auricular surgical reconstruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document