Capital Account Management or Laissez-faire of Capital Flows in Developing Countries

Author(s):  
Jan Priewe
Author(s):  
José Antonio Ocampo

This chapter looks at the transition from the acceptance at Bretton Woods of capital account management as a normal policy instrument to the liberalization of the capital account, first in developed countries and later in developing countries. It then analyses the risks of capital account liberalization, particularly the relation between capital account liberalization and the boom–bust cycles in global finance which have severely affected emerging and developing countries since the 1970s. It finally reviews the controversies around the effects of capital account liberalization and the evidence of success or failure with capital account management. Overall, there is significant evidence that capital account regulations improve the composition of capital flows towards less reversible flows and increase monetary independence without sacrifising exchange rate objectives. They also may have a desirable effect on the magnitude of flows and on exchange rates, but these effects are contested by some authors.


1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (4I) ◽  
pp. 125-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsin S. Khan

The surge of private capital flows to developing countries that occurred in the 1990s has been the most significant phenomenon of the decade for these countries. By the middle of the decade many developing countries in Asia and Latin America were awash with private foreign capital. In contrast to earlier periods when the scarcity of foreign capital dominated economic policy-making in these countries, the issue now for governments was how to manage the largescale capital inflows to generate higher rates ofinvestrnent and growth. While a number of developing countries were able to benefit substantially from the private foreign financing that globalisation made available to them, it also became apparent that capital inflows were not a complete blessing and could even turn out to be a curse. Indeed, in some countries capital inflows led to rapid monetary expansion, inflationary pressures, real exchange rate appreciation, fmancial sector difficulties, widening current account deficits, and a rapid build-up of foreign debt. In addition, as the experience of Mexico in 1994 and the Asian crisis of 1997-98 demonstrated, financial integration and globalisation can cut both ways. Private capital flows are volatile and eventually there can be a large reversal of capital because of changes in expected asset returns, investor herding behaviour, and contagion effects. Such reversals can lead to recessions and serious problems for financial systems. This paper examines the characteristics, causes and consequences of capital flows to developing countries in the 1990s. It also highlights the appropriate policy responses for governments facing such inflows, specifically to prevent overheating of the economy, and to limit the vulnerability to reversals of capital flows.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas ◽  
Olivier Jeanne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document