Erratum: "Structural Evaluation of Airfield Rigid Pavements Using Falling Weight Deflectometer" (May/June, 1993, Vol. 119, No. 3)

1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-515
Author(s):  
Boming Tang
Keyword(s):  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Structural Evaluation ◽  
Rigid Pavements ◽  
Falling Weight

Direct Method for Evaluating Structural Needs of Flexible Pavements with Falling-Weight Deflectometer Deflections

2003 ◽  
Vol 1860 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario S. Hoffman
Keyword(s):  
Direct Method ◽  
Flexible Pavements ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Traffic Demand ◽  
Structural Evaluation ◽  
Overlay Design ◽  
Subgrade Modulus ◽  
Simple Equations ◽  
Falling Weight

A direct and simple method (YONAPAVE) for evaluating the structural needs of flexible pavements is presented. It is based on interpretation of measured falling-weight deflectometer (FWD) deflection basins using mechanistic and practical approaches. YONAPAVE estimates the effective structural number (SN) and the equivalent subgrade modulus independently of the pavement or layer thicknesses. Thus, there is no need to perform boreholes, which are expensive, time-consuming, and disruptive to traffic. Knowledge of the effective SN and the subgrade modulus together with an estimate of the traffic demand allows the determination of the overlay required to accommodate future needs. YONAPAVE’s simple equations can be solved using a pocket calculator, making it suitable for rapid estimates in the field. The simplicity of the method, and its independence from major computer programs, make YONAPAVE suitable for estimating the structural needs of a road network using FWD data collected on a routine or periodic basis along network roads. YONAPAVE can be used with increased experience and confidence as the basis for nondestructive testing structural evaluation and overlay design at the project level.

Visco-Elastic Back-Calculation of Traffic Speed Deflectometer Measurements

2019 ◽  
Vol 2673 (12) ◽  
pp. 439-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoffer P. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Calculation Procedure ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Calculation Algorithm ◽  
Structural Evaluation ◽  
Driving Speed ◽  
Back Calculation ◽  
Traffic Speed ◽  
Falling Weight ◽  
Calculation Procedures ◽  
Project Level

The traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) has proven a valuable tool for network level structural evaluation. At the project level, however, the use of TSD data is still quite limited. An obstacle to the use of TSD at the project level is that the standard approaches to back-calculation of pavement properties are based on the falling weight deflectometer (FWD). The FWD experiment is similar, but not equivalent, to the TSD experiment, and therefore it is not straightforward to apply the traditional FWD back-calculation procedures to TSD data. In this paper, a TSD-specific back-calculation procedure is presented. The procedure is based on a layered linear visco-elastic pavement model and takes the driving speed of the vehicle into account. This is in contrast to most existing back-calculation procedures, which treat the problem as static and the pavement as purely elastic. The developed back-calculation procedure is tested on both simulated and real TSD data. The real TSD measurements exhibit significant effects of damping and visco-elasticity. The back-calculation algorithm is able to capture these effects and yields model fits in excellent agreement with the measured values.

scholarly journals A new method to determine maintenance and repair activities at network-level pavement management using falling weight deflectometer

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir KAVUSSI ◽  
Mojtaba ABBASGHORBANI ◽  
Fereidoon MOGHADAS NEJAD ◽  
Armin BAMDAD ZIKSARI
Keyword(s):  
Resilient Modulus ◽  
Pavement Management ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Pavement Management System ◽  
Pavement Condition ◽  
Maintenance And Repair ◽  
Structural Evaluation ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
Field Data Collection ◽  
Falling Weight

Pavement condition assessment at network level requires structural evaluation that can be achieved using Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD). Upon analysing FWD data, appropriate maintenance and repair methods (preser­vation, rehabilitation or reconstruction) could be assigned to various pavement sections. In this study, Structural Condi­tion Index (SCI), defined as the ratio of Effective Structural Number (SNeff) to Required Structural Number (SNreq), was used to determine if a pavement requires preservation or rehabilitation works (i.e. preservation SCI > 1, rehabilitation SCI < 1). In addition to FWD deflection data, SCI calculation requires pavement layer thicknesses that is obtained using GPR with elaborated and time consuming works. In order to reduce field data collection and analysis time at network-level pavement management, SCI values were calculated without having knowledge of pavement layer thicknesses. Two regression models were developed based on several thousand FWD deflection data to calculate SNeff of pavements and resilient modulus (MR) of their subgrades. Subgrades MR values together with traffic data were then used to calculate SNreq. Statistical analysis of deflection data indicated that Area under Pavement Profile (AUPP) and the deflection at distance of 60 cm from load center (D60) parameters showed to have strong correlation with SNeff and MR respectively. The determination coefficients of the two developed models were greater than those of previous models reported in the literature. The significant result of this study was to calculate SNeff and MR using the same deflection data. Finally, imple­mentation of the developed method was described in determining appropriate Maintenance and Repair (M&R) method at network level pavement management system.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Load transfer in rigid pavements by Rolling wheel deflectometer and Falling weight deflectometer

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 376-383
Author(s):  
Pawan Deep ◽  
Mathias B. Andersen ◽  
Søren Rasmussen ◽  
Nick Thom ◽  
Alessandro Marradi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Rigid Pavements ◽  
Rolling Wheel ◽  
Falling Weight

scholarly journals Toward the Development of Load Transfer Efficiency Evaluation of Rigid Pavements by a Rolling Wheel Deflectometer

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Pawan Deep ◽  
Mathias B. Andersen ◽  
Nick Thom ◽  
Davide Lo Presti
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Transfer Efficiency ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Rigid Pavement ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Rigid Pavements ◽  
Load Transfer Efficiency ◽  
Rolling Wheel ◽  
Falling Weight

The jointed rigid pavement is currently evaluated by the Falling weight deflectometer which is rather slow for the testing of the jointed pavements. Continuous nondestructive evaluation of rigid pavements with a rolling wheel deflectometer can be used to measure the load transfer and is investigated. Load transfer is an important indicator of the rigid pavement’s condition and this is the primary factor which is studied. Continuous data from experimental measurements across a joint allows for the determination of not only the load transfer efficiency provided parameters characterizing the pavement is known. A three-dimensional semi-analytical model was implemented for simulating the pavement response near a joint and used for interpretation and verification of the experimental data. Results show that this development is promising for the use of a rolling wheel deflectometer for rapid evaluation of joints.

Moving Wheel versus Impact Deflections and Their Use in Pavement Evaluation

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110288
Author(s):  
Douglas Steele ◽  
Hyung Suk Lee ◽  
Curt Beckemeyer ◽  
Thomas Van
Keyword(s):  
Moving Load ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Falling Weight Deflectometer ◽  
Structural Evaluation ◽  
Pavement Evaluation ◽  
Advanced Analysis ◽  
Finite Layer ◽  
Pavement Structures ◽  
Rolling Wheel ◽  
Falling Weight

Traffic speed deflection devices (TSDDs) have been developed since around 2000 to allow for safe and efficient structural evaluation of highway networks. One barrier to TSDD implementation is the inherent differences in deflections produced by moving truck loads and by falling weight deflectometer (FWD), the current deflection testing standard. To better understand the differences in data produced by the two devices, FHWA sponsored research into one particular TSDD, the rolling wheel deflectometer (RWD). The study utilized the finite layer program ViscoWave to model both FWD and RWD loads to demonstrate the effect of their inherent differences on pavement deflections and other simulated parameters. In addition, ViscoWave was used to generate theoretical FWD and RWD deflections for a diverse set of pavement structures and subgrade conditions. The resulting deflections were used to develop correlations between the two devices, which were validated with side-by-side FWD and RWD field tests performed on 23 sites. The research determined that the differences between FWD and RWD deflections vary depending on pavement factors and loading characteristics. The two devices produced similar deflections on thicker, stiffer, lower-deflection pavements, while the FWD produced relatively higher deflections on thinner, weaker, higher-deflection pavements. Therefore, use of common FWD data analysis programs will produce different results, such as layer moduli, for TSDD devices. Advanced analysis routines capable of modeling the TSDD’s moving load and loading configurations are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document