Multiobjective Stochastic Fractional Goal Programming Model for Water Resources Optimal Allocation among Industries

2016 ◽  
Vol 142 (10) ◽  
pp. 04016036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Feng Ren ◽  
Rui Huan Li ◽  
Liu Dong Zhang ◽  
Ping Guo
Author(s):  
Animesh Biswas ◽  
Nilkanta Modak

In this article a fuzzy goal programming model is developed to solve multiobjective unbalanced transportation problems with fuzzy random parameters. In model formulation process the cost coefficients of the objectives are considered as fuzzy numbers and the supplies and demands are considered as fuzzy random variables with known fuzzy probability distribution from the view point of probabilistic as well as possibilistic uncertainties involved with the model. A fuzzy programming model is first constructed by applying chance constrained programming methodology in fuzzy environment. Then, the model is decomposed on the basis of the tolerance ranges of the fuzzy numbers associated with it. The individual optimal solution of each decomposed objectives is found in isolation to construct the membership goals of the objectives. Finally, priority based fuzzy goal programming technique is used to achieve the highest degree of each of the defined membership goals to the extent possible by minimizing the under deviational variables and thereby obtaining optimal allocation of products by using distance function in a cost minimizing decision making environment. An illustrative example is solved and compared with existing technique to explore the potentiality of the proposed methodology.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Fernando García ◽  
Francisco Guijarro ◽  
Javier Oliver

This paper proposes the use of a goal programming model for the objective ranking of universities. This methodology has been successfully used in other areas to analyze the performance of firms by focusing on two opposite approaches: (a) one favouring those performance variables that are aligned with the central tendency of the majority of the variables used in the measurement of the performance, and (b) an alternative one that favours those different, singular, or independent performance variables. Our results are compared with the ranking proposed by two popular World University Rankings, and some insightful differences are outlined. We show how some top-performing universities occupy the best positions regardless of the approach followed by the goal programming model, hence confirming their leadership. In addition, our proposal allows for an objective quantification of the importance of each variable in the performance of universities, which could be of great interest to decision-makers.


1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila M. Lawrence ◽  
Kenneth D. Lawrence ◽  
Gary R. Reeves

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (18) ◽  
pp. 5540-5558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneirson Francisco da Silva ◽  
Fernando Augusto Silva Marins ◽  
Erica Ximenes Dias

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document