Near-contact hydrodynamics of two viscous drops

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Davis
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 642-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASAFUMI KURIYAMA ◽  
HIDEKI TOKANAI ◽  
HIROTAKA KONNO

2015 ◽  
Vol 779 ◽  
pp. 87-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Beilharz ◽  
A. Guyon ◽  
E. Q. Li ◽  
M.-J. Thoraval ◽  
S. T. Thoroddsen

Drops impacting at low velocities onto a pool surface can stretch out thin hemispherical sheets of air between the drop and the pool. These air sheets can remain intact until they reach submicron thicknesses, at which point they rupture to form a myriad of microbubbles. By impacting a higher-viscosity drop onto a lower-viscosity pool, we have explored new geometries of such air films. In this way we are able to maintain stable air layers which can wrap around the entire drop to form repeatable antibubbles, i.e. spherical air layers bounded by inner and outer liquid masses. Furthermore, for the most viscous drops they enter the pool trailing a viscous thread reaching all the way to the pinch-off nozzle. The air sheet can also wrap around this thread and remain stable over an extended period of time to form a cylindrical air sheet. We study the parameter regime where these structures appear and their subsequent breakup. The stability of these thin cylindrical air sheets is inconsistent with inviscid stability theory, suggesting stabilization by lubrication forces within the submicron air layer. We use interferometry to measure the air-layer thickness versus depth along the cylindrical air sheet and around the drop. The air film is thickest above the equator of the drop, but thinner below the drop and up along the air cylinder. Based on microbubble volumes, the thickness of the cylindrical air layer becomes less than 100 nm before it ruptures.


1999 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Richard ◽  
D Quéré
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. S. McKinley ◽  
S. K. Wilson ◽  
B. R. Duffy

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. A. Janssen ◽  
A. Vananroye ◽  
P. Van Puyvelde ◽  
P. Moldenaers ◽  
P. D. Anderson
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Bruce Jackson ◽  
Donald E. Low ◽  
Dan Dattani ◽  
Paul F. Whitsitt ◽  
Randall G. Leeder ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 813 ◽  
pp. 647-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Langley ◽  
E. Q. Li ◽  
S. T. Thoroddsen

A drop impacting on a solid surface must push away the intervening gas layer before making contact. This entails a large lubricating air pressure which can deform the bottom of the drop, thus entrapping a bubble under its centre. For a millimetric water drop, the viscous-dominated flow in the thin air layer counteracts the inertia of the drop liquid. For highly viscous drops the viscous stresses within the liquid also affect the interplay between the drop and the gas. Here the drop also forms a central dimple, but its outer edge is surrounded by an extended thin air film, without contacting the solid. This is in sharp contrast with impacts of lower-viscosity drops where a kink in the drop surface forms at the edge of the central disc and makes a circular contact with the solid. Larger drop viscosities make the central air dimple thinner. The thin outer air film subsequently ruptures at numerous random locations around the periphery, when it reaches below 150 nm thickness. This thickness we measure using high-speed two-colour interferometry. The wetted circular contacts expand rapidly, at orders of magnitude larger velocities than would be predicted by a capillary–viscous balance. The spreading velocity of the wetting spots is ${\sim}0.4~\text{m}~\text{s}^{-1}$ independent of the liquid viscosity. This may suggest enhanced slip of the contact line, assisted by rarefied-gas effects, or van der Waals forces in what we call extreme wetting. Myriads of micro-bubbles are captured between the local wetting spots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document