A theoretical study of Gemini surfactant phase behavior

1998 ◽  
Vol 109 (13) ◽  
pp. 5651-5658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine M. Layn ◽  
Pablo G. Debenedetti ◽  
Robert K. Prud’homme
2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbora Piknova ◽  
Vincent Schram ◽  
StephenB Hall

Langmuir ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 986-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Akamatsu ◽  
Kosuke Ogura ◽  
Koji Tsuchiya ◽  
Kenichi Sakai ◽  
Masahiko Abe ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 3030
Author(s):  
Amjed Hassan ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud ◽  
Muhammad Shahzad Kamal ◽  
Syed Muhammad Shakil Hussain ◽  
Shirish Patil

Condensate accumulation in the vicinity of the gas well is known to curtail hydrocarbon production by up to 80%. Numerous approaches are being employed to mitigate condensate damage and improve gas productivity. Chemical treatment, gas recycling, and hydraulic fracturing are the most effective techniques for combatting the condensate bank. However, the gas injection technique showed temporary condensate recovery and limited improvement in gas productivity. Hydraulic fracturing is considered to be an expensive approach for treating condensate banking problems. In this study, a newly synthesized gemini surfactant (GS) was developed to prevent the formation of condensate blockage in the gas condensate reservoirs. Flushing the near-wellbore area with GS will change the rock wettability and thereby reduce the capillary forces holding the condensate due to the strong adsorption capacity of GS on the rock surface. In this study, several measurements were conducted to assess the performance of GS in mitigating the condensate bank including coreflood, relative permeability, phase behavior, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. The results show that GS can reduce the capillary pressure by as much as 40%, increase the condensate mobility by more than 80%, and thereby mitigate the condensate bank by up to 84%. Phase behavior measurements indicate that adding GS to the oil–brine system could not induce any emulsions at different salinity levels. Moreover, NMR and permeability measurements reveal that the gemini surfactant has no effect on the pore system and no changes were observed in the T2 relaxation profiles with and without the GS injection. Ultimately, this work introduces a novel and effective treatment for mitigating the condensate bank. The new treatment showed an attractive performance in reducing liquid saturation and increasing the condensate relative permeability.


2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 1573-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihisa T. Kodama ◽  
Chin-Chang Kuo ◽  
Thomas Boatwright ◽  
Michael Dennin

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1369-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Giorgi ◽  
Antonio Palumbo Piccionello ◽  
Andrea Pace ◽  
Silvestre Buscemi

2016 ◽  
Vol 466 ◽  
pp. 138-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kaizu ◽  
Paschalis Alexandridis

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 2682-2696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan W. Berger ◽  
Colleen M. Gendron ◽  
Abraham M. Lenhoff ◽  
Eric W. Kaler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document