scholarly journals Fast discrete homogenization approach for the analysis under out-of-plane loads of unreinforced and TRM reinforced masonry panels

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Scacco ◽  
Bahman Ghiassi ◽  
Gabriele Milani ◽  
Paulo B. Lourenço
2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (8) ◽  
pp. 04019073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek El-Hashimy ◽  
Mohamed Ezzeldin ◽  
Michael Tait ◽  
Wael El-Dakhakhni

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 100945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarkar Noor-E-Khuda ◽  
Manicka Dhanasekar

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 367-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazli Azimikor ◽  
Svetlana Brzev ◽  
Kenneth J. Elwood ◽  
Donald L. Anderson ◽  
William McEwen

Results of a study performed on the out-of-plane instability of reinforced masonry shear walls (RMSW) under seismic loading are presented. The study was conducted to gain understanding of the out-of-plane instability mechanism and the key factors influencing its development through the testing of five reinforced masonry uniaxial specimens under reversed cyclic tension and compression. The specimens represented the end zone of a RMSW. The design parameters considered in the study included longitudinal reinforcement ratio and height-to-thickness ratio for the test specimens. It was found that onset of out-of-plane instability is strongly influenced by the level of tensile strains developed in the specimens, the reinforcement ratio, and the bar size. In this case, out-of-plane instability occurred when out-of-plane displacements exceeded the critical value equal to half the wall thickness. A study on full-scale RMSW specimens subjected to reversed cyclic loading, also undertaken under this research program, is expected to verify the findings of this study and contribute towards development of design criteria for out-of-plane stability of RMSW.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca da Porto ◽  
Flavio Mosele ◽  
Claudio Modena

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 424-438
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Isfeld ◽  
Anna Louisa Müller ◽  
Mark Hagel ◽  
Nigel G. Shrive

The Canadian masonry design standard appears to be overly conservative in determining the capacity of concrete block walls with slenderness ratios greater than 30. When assessing the potential for buckling of a masonry wall according to Euler buckling criteria, the effective height is determined in part from the end supports. In Euler theory only pinned, fixed and free support conditions are considered, and the Canadian standard considers the support conditions to be hinged, elastic or stiff. For a partially reinforced masonry wall a true hinged base support is expected to be difficult to achieve, as the width of the concrete block restrains rotation. The effect of the base support conditions on the deflected shape of partially grouted block walls was investigated under axial and out-of-plane loading. The results of this testing were compared with calculations based on the Canadian masonry standard. It becomes clear that the standard is overly conservative in many cases and the design of slender walls needs to be re-examined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document