EVOLUTION OF THE MESOZOIC SEDIMENTARY BASINS ON THE EAST COAST OF INDIA

1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Sastri ◽  
A. T. R. Raju ◽  
R. N. Sinha ◽  
B. S. Venkatachala

The stratigraphy, structure, and tectonics of the Cauvery, Godavari-Krishna, Palar, and Mahanadi Basins located on the east coast of India are considered on the basis of up-to-date surface and subsurface data with particular reference to their evolution during the Mesozoic Era.The sediments exposed in the respective basins are limited to their western and northern borders and represent a relatively smaller stratigraphic interval as compared to the sequence known to be present in the subsurface.Each of these basins is bordered to the west by down-to-the-basin faults. The structural style and recognisable regional trends of the respective basins parallel those of the Eastern Ghats which were largely responsible for their evolution during the Jurassic period. The basin morphology during Late Jurassic comprised horsts and grabens formed due to tensional forces leading to basin subsidence with localised uplifts. The close of the Mesozoic was marked by a regional easterly regression and basinal tilt and an almost complete cessation of horst and graben development and the formation of an essentially monoclinal post-Mesozoic sedimentary cover.A close similarity between the Mesozoic sedimentary basins on the east coast of India and those on the west coast of Australia is marked inasmuch as their tectonic setting, structural style, lithologic suites and faunal and palynological assemblages are concerned. The study broadly indicates that during the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous period the basins on the east coast of India were bordered by land masses similar to those postulated to the west of the West Australian basins.

2018 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 88-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dattesh V. Desai ◽  
Dhiraj Narale ◽  
Lidita Khandeparker ◽  
Arga Chandrashekar Anil

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-26
Author(s):  
A. M. Nikishin ◽  
K. F. Startseva ◽  
V. E. Verzhbitsky ◽  
S. Cloetingh ◽  
N. A. Malyshev ◽  
...  

Abstract The seismic stratigraphy scheme for the shelf basins of the East Siberian Sea and the Chukchi Sea region and the adjacent deep-water part of the Amerasia basin has been developed, and mega-sequences (or tectonostratigraphic units) with proposed age of 125100, 10080, 8066, 6656, 4645, 4534, 200 Ma are distinguished. Zhokhov foredeep basin of the Late Jurassic‒Neocomian age is distinguished between the New Siberia and De Long islands. Three main phases of rifting are identified on the shelves in the region with ages of 125100, 6656 and 4537 Ma. The main phase of continental rifting occurred in the Podvodnikov and Toll basins 125100 Ma. The typical clinoform accumulation of sediments occurred at the edge of the shelf 6620 Ma. We identified three syntectonic epochs of the formation of clinoform complexes with ages of 6645, 4534 and 3420 Ma. The phase of uplifting and compression in the region of Wrangel Island happened 66 Ma. The relatively monotonous tectonic setting with approximately the same thickness of the sedimentary cover began from 20 Ma.


Foreland and rift margin basins are compared on the basis of (1) their tectonic setting, (2) reasons for subsidence, and (3) their large-scale geophysical and geological characteristics. The thermal and mechanical properties of the underlying lithosphere are shown to be fundamental to the form of tectonic subsidence. The lithosphere beneath foreland basins is flexurally downwarped by the loading of the adjacent fold-thrust belt, whereas tectonic subsidence at rifted margins is caused by mass replacement at depth, during lithospheric extension on rifting, and subsequent thermal contraction as the lithosphere cools. The effects of rheology, thermal maturity, and lateral changes in properties of the lithosphere are outlined for foreland basins, as is the topographic effect of possible phase changes beneath the fold-thrust belt. The thermal and rheological consequences of lithospheric extension at rift margins makes flexural subsidence relatively less important than in foreland basins. Flexure may, however, be partly responsible for uplift landward of the hinge line that is associated with rifting. Other mechanisms that could cause such uplift include depth-dependent extension and thermal expansion due to the lateral diffusion of heat. The models describing the evolution of these basins are shown to predict characteristics that are in accord with observations. The superposition of foreland and rift margin basins as a result of ocean closure can lead to an overall basin stratigraphy that is complex. Such phases of basin subsidence must be separated according to the tectonic environment in which they formed in any analysis of the cause and consequences of basin evolution.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 517-520
Author(s):  
VIJAYA BHANU, CH VIJAYA BHANU, CH ◽  
◽  
ANNAPURNA, C ANNAPURNA, C ◽  
SRINIVASA RAO, M SRINIVASA RAO, M ◽  
SIVA LAKSHMI, M. V SIVA LAKSHMI, M. V ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaik Sai Babu ◽  
Venigalla Purnachandra Rao ◽  
Nannapaneni Satyasree ◽  
Ravipati Venkata Ramana ◽  
Mekala Ram Mohan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document