AbstractSince at first sight aging seems to be omnipresent, many authors to this very day regard it as an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics. However, studies published in the past two decades have conclusively shown that a number of organisms do not age, or at least do not age on a scale comparable with other aging organisms. This disparity leads us to question why aging evolved in some organisms and not in others. We thus present a mathematical model which simulates evolution in a sexually reproducing population composed of aging and non-aging individuals. We have observed that aging individuals may outcompete non-aging individuals if they have a higher starting fertility or if the main mating pattern in the population is assortative mating. Furthermore, stronger pathogen pressure was found to help the aging phenotype when compared to the non-aging phenotype. Last but not least, the aging phenotype was found to more easily outcompete the non-aging one or to resist the dominance of the latter for a longer period of time in populations composed of dimorphic sexually reproducing individuals compared to populations of hermaphrodites. Our findings are consistent with both classical evolutionary theories of aging and with evolutionary theories of aging which assume the existence of an aging program. They can thus potentially work as a bridge between these two opposing views, suggesting that the truth in fact lies somewhere in between.Significance StatementThis study presents the first mathematical model which simulates the evolution of aging in a population of sexually reproducing organisms. Our model shows that aging individuals may outcompete non-aging individuals in several scenarios known to occur in nature. Our work thus provides important insight into the question why aging has evolved in most, but not all, organisms.
A test of evolutionary theories of aging
