Utility of the Trail Making Test in the Assessment of Malingering in a Sample of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Litigants

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sid E. O’Bryant ◽  
Robin C. Hilsabeck ◽  
Jerid M. Fisher ◽  
Robert J. McCaffrey
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 798-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
J. F. Linck ◽  
D. J. Heyanka ◽  
N. J. Pastorek ◽  
B. Miller ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 897-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rael T. Lange ◽  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Martin J. Zakrzewski ◽  
Patrick E. Ethel-King ◽  
Michael D. Franzen

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Bolduc-Teasdale ◽  
Pierre Jolicoeur ◽  
Michelle McKerral

Objective: Attentional problems are amongst the most commonly reported complaints following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), including difficulties orienting and disengaging attention, sustaining it over time, and dividing attentional resources across multiple simultaneous demands. The objective of this study was to track, using a single novel electrophysiological task, various components associated with the deployment of visuospatial selective attention. Methods: A paradigm was designed to evoke earlier visual evoked potentials (VEPs), as well as attention-related and visuocognitive ERPs. Data from 36 individuals with mTBI (19 subacute, 17 chronic) and 22 uninjured controls are presented. Postconcussion symptoms (PCS), anxiety (BAI), depression (BDI-II) and visual attention (TEA Map Search, DKEFS Trail Making Test) were also assessed. Results: Earlier VEPs (P1, N1), as well as processes related to visuospatial orientation (N2pc) and encoding in visual short-term memory (SPCN), appear comparable in mTBI and control participants. However, there appears to be a disruption in the spatiotemporal dynamics of attention (N2pc-Ptc, P2) in subacute mTBI, which recovers within six months. This is also reflected in altered neuropsychological performance (information processing speed, attentional shifting). Furthermore, orientation of attention (P3a) and working memory processes (P3b) are also affected and remain as such in the chronic post-mTBI period, in co-occurrence with persisting postconcussion symptomatology. Conclusions: This study adds original findings indicating that such a sensitive and rigorous ERP task implemented at diagnostic and follow-up levels could allow for the identification of subtle but complex brain activation and connectivity deficits that can occur following mTBI.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Allen ◽  
Nicholas S. Thaler ◽  
Erik N. Ringdahl ◽  
Sally J. Barney ◽  
Joan Mayfield

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
D. N. Allen ◽  
J. S. Hart ◽  
J. R. Boucher ◽  
J. C. McMurray ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
J PERIANEZ ◽  
M RIOSLAGO ◽  
J RODRIGUEZSANCHEZ ◽  
D ADROVERROIG ◽  
I SANCHEZCUBILLO ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 868-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Egeto ◽  
Shaylea D. Badovinac ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Tisha J. Ornstein ◽  
Tom A. Schweizer

Abstract Objectives: Guidelines on return-to-driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are scarce. Since driving requires the coordination of multiple cognitive, perceptual, and psychomotor functions, neuropsychological testing may offer an estimate of driving ability. To examine this, a meta-analysis of the relationship between neuropsychological testing and driving ability after TBI was performed. Methods: Hedge’s g and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. Analyses were performed on cognitive domains and individual tests. Meta-regressions examined the influence of study design, demographic, and clinical factors on effect sizes. Results: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Executive functions had the largest effect size (g = 0.60 [0.39–0.80]), followed by verbal memory (g = 0.49 [0.27–0.71]), processing speed/attention (g = 0.48 [0.29–0.67]), and visual memory (g = 0.43 [0.14–0.71]). Of the individual tests, Useful Field of Vision (UFOV) divided attention (g = 1.12 [0.52–1.72]), Trail Making Test B (g = 0.75 [0.42–1.08]), and UFOV selective attention (g = 0.67 [0.22–1.12]) had the largest effects. The effect sizes for Choice Reaction Time test and Trail Making Test A were g = 0.63 (0.09–1.16) and g = 0.58 (0.10–1.06), respectively. Years post injury (β = 0.11 [0.02–0.21] and age (β = 0.05 [0.009–0.09]) emerged as significant predictors of effect sizes (both p < .05). Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence of associations between neuropsychological test performance and driving ability after moderate to severe TBI and highlight moderating effects of demographic and clinical factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document