The role of risk assessment and the rate of discount in benefit‐cost analysis: modeling irreversible energy externalities

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Brady

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
James K. Hammitt

Abstract Benefit–cost analysis (BCA) is often viewed as measuring the efficiency of a policy independent of the distribution of its consequences. The role of distributional effects on policy choice is disputed; either: (a) the policy that maximizes net benefits should be selected and distributional concerns should be addressed through other measures, such as tax and transfer programs or (b) BCA should be supplemented with distributional analysis and decision-makers should weigh efficiency and distribution in policy choice. The separation of efficiency and distribution is misleading. The measure of efficiency depends on the numéraire chosen for the analysis, whether monetary values or some other good (unless individuals have the same rates of substitution between them). The choice of numéraire is not neutral; it can affect the ranking of policies by calculated net benefits. Alternative evaluation methods, such as BCA using a different numéraire, weighted BCA, or a social welfare function (SWF), may better integrate concerns about distribution and efficiency. The most appropriate numéraire, distributional weights, or SWFs cannot be measured or statistically estimated; it is a normative choice.



1991 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Cooke


Risk Analysis ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Rycroft ◽  
James L. Regens ◽  
Thomas Dietz


Author(s):  
William P. Graf ◽  
Dave Dittmer ◽  
Tom Wharton ◽  
Hans Conradt


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony C. Homan ◽  
Teresa M. Adams ◽  
Alex J. Marach


Tibuana ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (02) ◽  
pp. 120-124
Author(s):  
Rina Sandora ◽  
Fani Sandy Putra ◽  
Galih Anindita

Determination of hazard identification and risk assessment on the company can not be separated from the calculation of the cost budget. The aim is to provide recommendations and calculate the profit rate using the Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) method so that the company will more easily determine the most appropriate and needed alternative in the company. From the incremental analysis calculation, an alternative solution and value obtained from BCA are gas detector H2S B / C ratio 1.14, crane certification B / C ratio 3.66, welding helmet B / C ratio value 5.53, wire rope B / C ratio value of 5.19, O2 detector value of B / C ratio 6.11, small handtruck value of B / C ratio 18.1, fire dry chemical powder B / C ratio value of 22.27, N2 gas detector value of ratio B / C 1.53.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document