Livelihood Change in Rural Zimbabwe over 20 Years

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 1241-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josphat Mushongah ◽  
Ian Scoones
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ton Dietz ◽  
David Millar ◽  
Saa Dittoh ◽  
Francis Obeng ◽  
Edward Ofori-Sarpong
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 26-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youba Raj Luintel

This article examines livelihoods transition among agrarian households in a cluster of villages adjacent to Kathmandu in a post-Neoliberal context. It specifically looks at the way these households respond to capitalist expansion in Nepal’s agrarian rural setting privileged to draw cash earnings. Looked at from the quest of longer term social change, this article identifies a great deal of similarity in household responses along class lines, and thus, concludes that household strategies broadly embrace class-specific behaviour. In identifying patterns of household response, this article also argues that class-differentiated analysis of household response can potentially illuminate social science understanding of the way capitalism penetrates into the countryside and brings social differentiation. Finally, this article demonstrates that social differentiation of agrarian households in rural Nepal is a mechanism of siphoning off of the rural surplus somewhere else (in this research context Kathmandu)–a mechanism widely attributed for an uneven development and underdevelopment of countryside Nepal. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Sambhu Paudel ◽  
Trishna Rayamajhi

Local people response was obtained on biodiversity change in lower Mustang relying on social survey and from various data sources for natural assets. The main focus was centralized on the change in avifaunal and mammalian diversity and the effect of environmental change on agricultural/livestock forest as well as on grazing land. The change was detected on wildlife movement, livestock depredation, forest stock, palatable species and birds. Climate change is the key issue in conserving biodiversity and linking its goal in livelihood. Change in livelihood pattern seems more adverse factor for community development as urbanization is prevalent. Animals and birds solely dependent in the nutshell area are at increasing rate but transition (forest and agriculture) species are decreasing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/init.v5i0.10256   The Initiation 2013 Vol.5; 68-74


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hallie Eakin ◽  
Kirsten Appendini
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document