Hill country sheep production

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Hight ◽  
K. E. Jury
1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Hight ◽  
K. E. Jury

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 317-322
Author(s):  
S.A. Mccoard ◽  
D. Ginter ◽  
P.R. Kenyon

New developments in the understanding of early life nutrition and whole of life performance offer opportunities for changing livestock performance in the future. How should hill country farmers use supplements and tactical nutritional additions to turn these insights into future benefits for sheep production? Opportunities may exist in adopting new forage species, and mixes of forage species, supplementary feeds and/ or functional supplements to enhance the performance of both the ewe and the lamb in late gestation and early lactation. The potential and problems of adding these as options into our pasture feeding system to more targeted feeding approaches are explored. Keywords: sheep, nutrition, forage


1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.K. Hight ◽  
K.E. Jury

1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Hight ◽  
K. E. Jury

Author(s):  
M.G. Lambert ◽  
D.A. Clark

Effects of late-May/early June application of fertiliser nitrogen (N) on pasture and animal performance from hill pastures, were measured durmg 1982.1984 on four 10 ha farmlets at Ballantrae Research Area near Woodville. Two farmlets had a history of high superphosphate (375 kg/ha/year) application and were stocked at 16.1 ewes/ha and two farmlets that received less superphosphate (125 kg/ha/year) were stocked at 12 ewes/ha. Urea was applied at rates equivalent to 3kg N/ewe, or 50 and 37kg N/ha/year respectively on one high fertiliser and one low fertiliser farmlet. Pasture production responses were large and reliable (range of 17 to 34, average of 28kg DM/kg N), and extended through winter into spring. Average legume content of pastures was depressed from 12 to 8% by N applicahon. Ewes were heavier in winter and spring where N was applied, but not at mating in April/May. Lambing performance was similar across farmlets, but weaned lamb liveweight was 14% higher where N was applied. Nitrogen use resulted in 6% greater ewe wool production and 12% greater lamb wool production. Profitability of N use would have been enhanced if utilisatlon of N-boosted pasture had been greater, more responsive stock classes used, or application of superphosphate reduced temporarily. Keywords: Hill country, North Island, hill pastures, urea, fertiliser nitrogen, sheep production. wool production, lamb produchon, profItabIlity.


1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Hight ◽  
J. J. Atkinson ◽  
R. M. W. Sumner ◽  
M. L. Bigham

Author(s):  
A. Mcrae

The numbers of beef animals in New Zealand have increased markedly since 1960. In particular the number of animals (especially bulls) reared within the dairy industry for beef production has grown. Early research into aspects of intensive pasture-based beef production systems concentrated on high levels of pasture utilisation and beef production per ha. Farmers have adapted these results and systems and the carcass weight (CW) of bulls slaughtered now at 15-18 months of age have increased and often are over 300 kg CW. It is shown simplistically that profit/ ha will also increase with increasing CW and increased efficiency in use of feed within 1yr bull beef systems. In practice however, utilising more of the pasture dry matter (DM) grown and maintaining pasture quality are important issues. Two year bull systems are shown to be just as profitable as the more technically efficient 1yr bull system. Where beef production is carried out in conjunction with sheep production, especially on hill country, some commonly used benchmarks of technical and economic efficiency may be misleading with regard to overall system profitability and the contribution of various classes of beef animals. Keywords: beef animals, bulls, economic efficiency, feed efficiency, profitability


1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.K. Hightt ◽  
K.E. Jury ◽  
D.R. Langt

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Hight ◽  
K. E. Jury ◽  
G. K. Hight

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document