scholarly journals Effect of simulated dairy cow treading on soil physical properties and ryegrass pasture yield

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Drewry ◽  
K. C. Cameron ◽  
G. D. Buchan
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Herbin ◽  
D. Hennessy ◽  
K. G. Richards ◽  
A. Piwowarczyk ◽  
J. J. Murphy ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 153 (8) ◽  
pp. 1424-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. TUOHY ◽  
O. FENTON ◽  
N. M. HOLDEN ◽  
J. HUMPHREYS

SUMMARYThere is little empirical evidence to indicate that dairy cow live weight affects the extent of soil damage at the hoof-soil interface during grazing on poorly drained permanent grassland. In the present study the impact of Holstein-Friesian (HF) dairy cows with a mean (±standard deviation) live weight of 570 (±61) kg were compared with Jersey × Holstein-Friesian (JX) with a mean live weight of 499 (±52) kg each at two stocking densities: mean 2·42 ± (0·062) and 2·66 (±0·079) cows/ha. Soil physical properties (bulk density, macroporosity, gravimetric water content, air-filled porosity, penetration resistance and shear strength), poaching damage (post-grazing soil surface deformation and hoof-print depth), herbage yield and milk production were measured throughout 2011 and 2012. Soil physical properties, post-grazing soil surface deformation and herbage production were not affected by dairy cow breed or by interactions between breed and stocking density. Hoof-print depth was higher in the HF treatments (39 v. 37 mm, s.e. 0·5 mm). Loading pressure imposed at the soil surface was the same for both breeds due to a direct correlation between live weight and hoof size. Poaching damage was greater at higher stocking density. Using the lighter JX cow offered little advantage in terms of lowering the negative impact of treading on soil physical properties or reducing poaching damage and no advantage in terms of herbage or milk production compared with the heavier HF cow.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
T Herbin ◽  
D Hennessy ◽  
J J Murphy ◽  
K Richards ◽  
A Piwowarczyk ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Houlbrooke ◽  
J. J. Drewry ◽  
R. M. Monaghan ◽  
R. J. Paton ◽  
L. C. Smith ◽  
...  

Soil Research ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Drewry ◽  
K. C. Cameron ◽  
G. D. Buchan

This paper reviews animal treading and the associated effects on soil physical properties and pasture productivity from treading-induced soil compaction and pugging. Response curve relationships between soil physical properties (e.g. macroporosity, air-filled porosity, bulk density) and pasture and crop yield are reviewed. Optimum soil macroporosity for maximum pasture and crop yield ranges from 6 to 17% v/v, but there is a paucity of yield response curves for pastoral systems, particularly critical or optimum values of soil physical properties. There is little information available on the effects of cattle treading on soil physical properties and consequently pasture yield in seasons when soil pugging and poaching is minimised. Such information is needed to provide practical and rigorously tested decision support tools for land managers during grazing seasons. Knowledge of yield response curves, and critical or optimum values of soil physical properties for field pasture-based grazing systems, is required for improved farm-system production and economic decision support.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Mei LI ◽  
Hong-Mei CAO ◽  
Fu-Li XU ◽  
Wu-Ting REN ◽  
Jian-Li LIU ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Rachman ◽  
S. H. Anderson ◽  
C. J. Gantzer ◽  
A. L. Thompson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document