Decolonizing Native American Rhetoric: Communicating Self-Determination

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-355
Author(s):  
Diana Isabel Martínez
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Annita Lucchesi

This thesis explores critical decolonial cartography as a possible language for communicating and better understanding complex, intergenerational experiences of genocide and colonialism among Native American peoples. Utilizing a self-reflexive methodology, this work makes interventions in Native American and indigenous studies, comparative genocide studies, historiography, and geography to argue for more expansive languages with which to grapple with Native experiences of genocide. In so doing, this paper also asserts the need for indigenous narrative self-determination, development of decolonial epistemologies and praxes on genocide, and languages for violence that are specifically designed to facilitate dialogue on healing. For that reason, this work not only positions cartography and maps as a particularly useful language for understanding indigenous experiences of genocide, but documents the development of this language, with the intent of supporting and guiding others in creating alternative languages that best fit their nation, community, family, and selves. Finally, the larger aim of this work is to make the case for languages on genocide that heal, rather than re-traumatize, and give a more holistic understanding of the ways in which genocide ‘takes place’ spatially and temporally, with the hope of creating a larger, more inclusive, less violent space for imagining and crafting restorative justice.


2003 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean J. Kotlowski

The period from 1969 to 1977 saw both unprecedented civil disobedience by Native American activists and breakthrough initiatives to advance Indian rights. This article argues that grass-roots protest helped push the executive branch to respond sympathetically to Native American concerns, replacing the policy of termination with one of tribal self-determination. After the seizure of Alcatraz Island (1969), Nixon's aides began work on a presidential statement repudiating termination and legislation to advance self-determination for Native Americans. Following the standoff at Wounded Knee (1973), Congress began to pass the President's agenda. Continuing Native American unrest kept Ford's White House on the course charted by Nixon. Whatever their shortcomings, both Presidents deserve high marks for redirecting Indian policy and for avoiding bloodshed during their many standoffs with American Indians.


1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Daniel Edwards ◽  
Jeanette Drews ◽  
John R. Seaman ◽  
Margie Egbert Edwards

1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Morris ◽  
Philip Wander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document