The examination of human skeletal remains: findings from a quality assurance programme as part of professional development in Australia and New Zealand

Author(s):  
Soren Blau ◽  
David Kang ◽  
Gregory Markowsky ◽  
Samantha Rowbotham
Radiocarbon ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 1447-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Brock ◽  
Joanna Ostapkowicz ◽  
Alex C Wiedenhoeft ◽  
Ian D Bull

ABSTRACTSince the mid-19th century, rare prehistoric wooden carvings and human skeletal remains have been dredged from Pitch Lake, Trinidad, during commercial asphalt mining. Establishing a chronology for these objects is challenging, due to both a lack of stratigraphic and contextual information and the necessity to completely remove any pitch to ensure accurate radiocarbon (14C) dates. A range of solvent extraction protocols was tested to identify the most suitable one for pretreating the Pitch Lake artifacts, and then applied to ten wooden objects and a human cranium recovered from the lake. Several of these objects yielded earlier dates than expected, raising concerns that pitch had remained after pretreatment and had affected the dates. Pyrolysis-GC/MS and optical microscopy techniques were applied to material from the human cranium, a weaving tool, and a small bowl. These techniques, as well as routinely applied laboratory quality assurance procedures, indicated that there was no residual pitch within the cranium or the weaving tool after pretreatment, giving confidence to the dates. However, the small bowl was observed to still be contaminated with pitch after extensive pretreatment, indicating that the date is too old and can only be considered as a terminus post quem.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 797-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Hogg ◽  
Thomas Higham ◽  
Steve Robertson ◽  
Roelf Beukens ◽  
Tuovi Kankainen ◽  
...  

The 14C Quality Assurance Programme coordinated by the IAEA (Rozanski et al. 1992) prepared a set of five new intercomparison materials, including 40–50 ka old subfossil wood excavated from New Zealand peat bogs (IAEA C-4 standard). Statistical analysis of 79 14C measurements made on the wood indicated considerable variation in the results, with a marked skewness toward more modern values. The wide range of results and the possibility of inhomogeneity within the standard prompted the recovery and analysis of replacement material. The new subfossil wood sample is kauri (Agathis australis), at least 50 ka old, excavated from a swamp in Northland. It is in the form of a single plank, 6 m long, weighing 80 kg. It will be forwarded to the IAEA in Vienna for milling and distribution. Subsamples were obtained from both ends of the plank and analyzed by six laboratories. We present here the results of these analyses and compare them with the previous IAEA intercalibration results for the C-4 standard.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joan Skinner

<p>In 1990 New Zealand midwives regained the legal right to practice autonomously Large numbers of midwives exited the hospital system to provide continuity of care both in the community and in the hospital. These midwives practise independently and are funded by the state to do so. The New Zealand College of Midwives has developed and promoted a midwifery model of partnership, incorporating this model into its Code of Ethics and Standards for Practice. In its commitment both to professional development and to accountability, and in partnership with consumers of maternity care, the College developed the Midwifery Standards Review Process. This process involves the midwife in an annual review of her practice. The midwife gathers and collates her statistics, and measures her practice against the NZCOM Standards for Practice. Consumer feedback forms are sent directly to the review co-ordinator. All this information is presented to a panel consisting of two midwifery peers and two consumer representatives. Together with the midwife they discuss her year's work and develop goals for the coming year. The purpose of the review is to provide the midwife with a supportive, educative environment in which to reflect on her practice while at the same time providing an avenue for professional accountability. This study describes the Midwives Standards Review Process in detail using a case study approach. It finds that the process is a unique and innovative addition to the ways peer review and reflective practice can be provided. It identifies the issues of quality assurance, reflective practice, supervision and competence as being of most relevance. In particular it develops the ideas of how reflective practice can be enhanced within a quality assurance model. It recommends that further research is undertaken to ascertain whether midwives using the process find it useful, in particular how it has assisted them in their professional development. Further research may also increase the body of knowledge on the nature of reflective practice and how it is best facilitated.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joan Skinner

<p>In 1990 New Zealand midwives regained the legal right to practice autonomously Large numbers of midwives exited the hospital system to provide continuity of care both in the community and in the hospital. These midwives practise independently and are funded by the state to do so. The New Zealand College of Midwives has developed and promoted a midwifery model of partnership, incorporating this model into its Code of Ethics and Standards for Practice. In its commitment both to professional development and to accountability, and in partnership with consumers of maternity care, the College developed the Midwifery Standards Review Process. This process involves the midwife in an annual review of her practice. The midwife gathers and collates her statistics, and measures her practice against the NZCOM Standards for Practice. Consumer feedback forms are sent directly to the review co-ordinator. All this information is presented to a panel consisting of two midwifery peers and two consumer representatives. Together with the midwife they discuss her year's work and develop goals for the coming year. The purpose of the review is to provide the midwife with a supportive, educative environment in which to reflect on her practice while at the same time providing an avenue for professional accountability. This study describes the Midwives Standards Review Process in detail using a case study approach. It finds that the process is a unique and innovative addition to the ways peer review and reflective practice can be provided. It identifies the issues of quality assurance, reflective practice, supervision and competence as being of most relevance. In particular it develops the ideas of how reflective practice can be enhanced within a quality assurance model. It recommends that further research is undertaken to ascertain whether midwives using the process find it useful, in particular how it has assisted them in their professional development. Further research may also increase the body of knowledge on the nature of reflective practice and how it is best facilitated.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document