Gender and Motivation: A Study of the Athletic and Academic Motivations of Division I Female College Basketball Players

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-92
Author(s):  
Mark Sherry ◽  
Kristi Zeller
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL J. LAMONTE ◽  
JASON T. MCKINNEX ◽  
SHELLEY M. QUINN ◽  
CYNTHIA N. BAINBRIDGE ◽  
PATRICIA A. EISENMAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 609
Author(s):  
Ja’Da Brayboy ◽  
Tianna Knuckles ◽  
Chatori Major ◽  
Taylor Tramel ◽  
Bailey Parton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 601-602
Author(s):  
T. Saruta ◽  
T. Onzuka ◽  
S. Yanagida ◽  
K. Tamaki ◽  
K. Egawa

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1067-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Conte ◽  
Nicholas Kolb ◽  
Aaron T. Scanlan ◽  
Fabrizio Santolamazza

Purpose: To characterize the weekly training load (TL) and well-being of college basketball players during the in-season phase. Methods: Ten (6 guards and 4 forwards) male basketball players (age 20.9 [0.9] y, stature 195.0 [8.2] cm, and body mass 91.3 [11.3] kg) from the same Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association team were recruited to participate in this study. Individualized training and game loads were assessed using the session rating of perceived exertion at the end of each training and game session, and well-being status was collected before each session. Weekly changes (%) in TL, acute-to-chronic workload ratio, and well-being were determined. Differences in TL and well-being between starting and bench players and between 1-game and 2-game weeks were calculated using magnitude-based statistics. Results: Total weekly TL and acute-to-chronic workload ratio demonstrated high week-to-week variation, with spikes up to 226% and 220%, respectively. Starting players experienced a higher (most likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (unclear) well-being status compared with bench players. Game scheduling influenced TL, with 1-game weeks demonstrating a higher (likely negative) total weekly TL and similar (most likely trivial) well-being status compared with 2-game weeks. Conclusions: These findings provide college basketball coaches information to optimize training strategies during the in-season phase. Basketball coaches should concurrently consider the number of weekly games and player status (starting vs bench player) when creating individualized periodization plans, with increases in TL potentially needed in bench players, especially in 2-game weeks.


1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1229-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Lamirand ◽  
David Rainey

18 female college basketball players were pretested on foul shooting, alternately assigned to relaxation or mental imagery training, and posttested after 4 training sessions over 3 weeks. Analysis of covariance indicated that the predicted improvement of the imagery group did not occur. The relaxation group was marginally superior at posttest


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712110245
Author(s):  
Eric G. Post ◽  
Michael D. Rosenthal ◽  
Hayley J. Root ◽  
Mitchell J. Rauh

Background: Previous surveys of youth sport parents have revealed that while parents believe early sport specialization is beneficial for improving sport ability, they also overestimate their child’s chances of receiving a college scholarship. Purpose: To (1) describe knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of parents of youth basketball players regarding sport specialization and college scholarships and (2) examine potential differences in child basketball participation characteristics based on parent income. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 805 parents (mean age, 39.9 ± 7.1 years; 353 female [43.9%]) of youth basketball players (mean age, 12.9 ± 2.5 years; 241 female [29.9%]) were recruited via Qualtrics Online Panels to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. Participants were required to be a parent of a child between 8 and 18 years of age who participated in organized youth basketball (ie, school, club, or recreational/local league). Participants were recruited to be nationally representative with regard to race/ethnicity (White, 62.7%; Hispanic/Latino of any race, 15.3%; African American/Black, 13.3%; Asian, 4.6%; ≥2 races, 2.9%; American Indian/Alaskan Native, 1.1%; Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, 0.1%). The questionnaire was adapted from previous research on parent knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs and consisted of 3 sections: (1) parent and child characteristics; (2) child basketball participation information (months per year of basketball participation, sport specialization status, receiving private coaching, traveling regularly for basketball competitions, participating on multiple teams at the same time); and (3) parent attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge regarding sport specialization and college basketball scholarships. Results: Most parents believed specialization increased their child’s chances of making a high school (71.4%) or college team (69.7%). Parents underestimated the availability of college basketball scholarships at the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) Division I and II levels (8.9 ± 5.1 vs reality of 13-15 per team) but overestimated availability at the Division III level (8.6 ± 5.7 vs reality of 0 per team). High-income parents spent significantly more money ($4748 USD [$1214-$10,246]) than middle-income ($2250 USD [$727-$5079]; P < .001) and low-income ($1043 USD [$368-$2444]; P < .001) parents. Conclusion: Parents believed specialization was important for sport success, but they underestimated college scholarship availability at the NCAA Division I and II levels while overestimating scholarship availability at the Division III level.


Author(s):  
MICHAEL J. LAMONTE ◽  
JASON T. MCKINNEY ◽  
SHELLEY M. QUINN ◽  
CYNTHIA N. BAINBRIDGE ◽  
PATRICIA A. EISENMAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Bailey Parton ◽  
Taylor Tramel ◽  
Chatori Major ◽  
Tianna Knuckles ◽  
Ja’Da Brayboy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document