Two fast buried pipe detection schemes in Ground Penetrating Radar images

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 2467-2484 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gamba ◽  
V. Belotti
Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1310-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Cardimona ◽  
William P. Clement ◽  
Katharine Kadinsky‐Cade

In 1995 and 1996, researchers associated with the US Air Force’s Phillips and Armstrong Laboratories took part in an extensive geophysical site characterization of the Groundwater Remediation Field Laboratory located at Dover Air Force Base, Dover, Delaware. This field experiment offered an opportunity to compare shallow‐reflection profiling using seismic compressional sources and low‐frequency ground‐penetrating radar to image a shallow, unconfined aquifer. The main target within the aquifer was the sand‐clay interface defining the top of the underlying aquitard at 10 to 14 m depth. Although the water table in a well near the site was 8 m deep, cone penetration geotechnical data taken across the field do not reveal a distinct water table. Instead, cone penetration tests show a gradual change in electrical properties that we interpret as a thick zone of partial saturation. Comparing the seismic and radar data and using the geotechnical data as ground truth, we have associated the deepest coherent event in both reflection data sets with the sand‐clay aquitard boundary. Cone penetrometer data show the presence of a thin lens of clays and silts at about 4 m depth in the north part of the field. This shallow clay is not imaged clearly in the low‐frequency radar profiles. However, the seismic data do image the clay lens. Cone penetrometer data detail a clear change in the soil classification related to the underlying clay aquitard at the same position where the nonintrusive geophysical measurements show a change in image character. Corresponding features in the seismic and radar images are similar along profiles from common survey lines, and results of joint interpretation are consistent with information from geotechnical data across the site.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuya Ishitsuka ◽  
Shinichiro Iso ◽  
Kyosuke Onishi ◽  
Toshifumi Matsuoka

Ground-penetrating radar allows the acquisition of many images for investigation of the pavement interior and shallow geological structures. Accordingly, an efficient methodology of detecting objects, such as pipes, reinforcing steel bars, and internal voids, in ground-penetrating radar images is an emerging technology. In this paper, we propose using a deep convolutional neural network to detect characteristic hyperbolic signatures from embedded objects. As a first step, we developed a migration-based method to collect many training data and created 53510 categorized images. We then examined the accuracy of the deep convolutional neural network in detecting the signatures. The accuracy of the classification was 0.945 (94.5%)–0.979 (97.9%) when using several thousands of training images and was much better than the accuracy of the conventional neural network approach. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the deep convolutional neural network in detecting characteristic events in ground-penetrating radar images.


2019 ◽  
Vol 436 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 623-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinbo Liu ◽  
Xihong Cui ◽  
Li Guo ◽  
Jin Chen ◽  
Wentao Li ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. W. Wahab ◽  
D. N. Chapman ◽  
C. D. F. Rogers ◽  
K. Y. Foo ◽  
S. W. Nawawi ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Xu ◽  
George A. McMechan

Modeling of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data in 2.5 dimensions is implemented by superposition of 2-D finite‐difference, time‐domain solutions of Maxwell's equations for different horizontal wavenumbers. Dielectric, magnetic, and conductive losses are included in a single formulation. Attenuations associated with dielectric and magnetic relaxations are introduced by superposition of Debye functions at a set of relaxation frequencies and using memory variables to replace convolutions between the field variables and the decay functions. Better fits to data may always be obtained using the superposition method than by the Cole‐Cole model. Good fits to both loss‐tangent versus frequency data from lab measurements, and to 500 and 900 MHz field GPR profiles of a buried pipe and the surrounding layers, demonstrate the flexibility and viability of the modeling algorithm. Discrepancies between lab and in‐situ measurements may be attributed to scale differences and local variations that make lab samples less representative of the site than the GPR profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document