Ideology, Linguistic Capital and the Medium of Instruction in Hong Kong

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Morrison ◽  
Icy Lui
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Chris Harwood ◽  
Conttia Lai

Abstract This article discusses the effects of Hong Kong’s language policy changes in education since China reclaimed the territory in 1997. It describes Hong Kongers’ perceptions of English and their mother tongue Cantonese, and considers the effects of the Cantonese medium of instruction (CMI) policy, which was introduced to promote biliteracy and trilingualism1 among Hong Kongers. The analysis shows that even though CMI results in deeper learning in Hong Kong students, the strength and status of English as the lingua franca in the territory remains strong, and access to the linguistic capital English brings remains restricted to those with financial capital to afford it.


Author(s):  
Vincent Kan ◽  
Bob Adamson

Francis of Education (print)/1474-8479 (online) Article 2010 Language in education debates in Hong Kong focus on the role and status of English (as the former colonial language and an important means for international communication); Cantonese, the mother tongue of the majority of the population; and Putonghua, the national language of China. This paper examines the language policy formulated in 1997–1998, and finds that it radically departed from previous policies by mandating the use of Cantonese as the medium of instruction in secondary schools. The paper then analyses two subsequent policy revisions and concludes that, while the tonal emphasis on mother-tongue education has remained, the policy revisions have reversed the language policy to previous practices that emphasised the importance of English.


1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy B.M. Tsui ◽  
Mark S.K. Shum ◽  
Chi Kin Wong ◽  
Shek Kam Tse ◽  
Wing Wah Ki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document