scholarly journals Between opportunities and constraints: right-wing populists as designers of migrant integration policy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Oliver Gruber ◽  
Sieglinde Rosenberger
2021 ◽  
pp. 002071522110506
Author(s):  
David De Coninck ◽  
Giacomo Solano ◽  
Willem Joris ◽  
Bart Meuleman ◽  
Leen d’Haenens

The link between integration policies and intergroup attitudes or threat perceptions has received considerable attention. However, no studies so far have been able to explore how this relationship changed following the European migration crisis due to a lack of recent comparative policy data. Using new MIPEX data, this is the first study to examine mechanisms underlying the policy-threat nexus following the European migration crisis, distinguishing between several strands of integration policies, and realistic and symbolic threat. To do so, we combine 2017 Eurobarometer data with 2017 Migrant Integration Policy data, resulting in a sample of 28,080 respondents nested in 28 countries. The analyses also control for economic conditions, outgroup size, and media freedom. Multilevel analyses indicate that respondents living in countries with more inclusive integration policies in general report lower realistic and symbolic threat. When investigating different policy strands, we find that inclusive policies regarding political participation and access to nationality for immigrants are associated with lower realistic and symbolic threat. We compare our findings to those from prior to the European migration crisis and discuss the potential role of this crisis in the policy-threat nexus.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hadjar ◽  
Susanne Backes

Abstract Contributing to the debate on the integration of migrants in Europe, this study focuses on Subjective Well-Being (SWB) of people with migration backgrounds compared to people without a migration background – specifying SWB in terms of successful integration. The analyses employ a multilevel perspective (data base: European Social Survey). On the macro level, gross domestic product (GDP), welfare regime, xenophobia and the migrant integration policy index (MIPEX) are considered; on the micro level, social origin, education, unemployment, income deprivation, relationship status, health status and controls. Findings indicate a disadvantage in SWB of first-generation migrants that goes beyond deficits regarding well-studied SWB determinants. The SWB gap between migrants and non-migrants is larger in countries with a high GDP and smaller in countries with a high MIPEX score.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ingleby

Abstract The 2015 MIPEX (Migrant Integration Policy Index) Health strand was developed to benchmark progress on implementing the Council of Europe's 2011 Recommendations on mobility, migration and access to health care. MIPEX collects data on both ‘downstream' and ‘upstream' policies. Though like we identified in the Road Map, it is paying more attention to the former kind. MIPEX data exist for all countries participating in the JAHEE WP7. Its unique advantage is that it contains a large, uniform collection of carefully standardized and operationalised indicators, enabling comparisons to be made between countries and between countries at different points in time. A common thread in the “Road Map” is that without a solid evidence base, we will not succeed in improving health equity for migrants. Background information on a country migrant population is important for estimating the kinds of demands that health and social services will face. Taking steps to promote the collection of such data is one of the most useful contributions JAHEE can make. While MIPEX covers Migrant Integration Policy, the CA includes a more comprehensive overview that can benefit practitioners, bureaucrats and policymakers in implementing strategic measures to mitigate gaps for better migrant health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document