Measuring Informal Housing Production in California Cities

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Wegmann ◽  
Sarah Mawhorter
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Aylin Akcabozan ◽  
Yüksel Demir

Abstract The intention of this paper is to provide a comparative parametric approach that to analyze informal housing patterns and to develop alternative housing paradigms by designing new formal housing patterns in Istanbul. This paper focuses on parameters which are effective in the formation of “informal housing settlements” considering the formal housing production alternatives. Observation, actual sources and parametric evaluation was used. This study aims to make comparison between organic informal housing structure and formal housing structure in Maltepe/ Istanbul housing settlement and analyse their physical and spatial patterns by using parametric evaluation approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 103437
Author(s):  
Xiao Li ◽  
Liupengfei Wu ◽  
Rui Zhao ◽  
Weisheng Lu ◽  
Fan Xue

2018 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 1533-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clyde Zhengdao Li ◽  
Jingke Hong ◽  
Cheng Fan ◽  
Xiaoxiao Xu ◽  
Geoffrey Qiping Shen

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea de Wet ◽  
Sophie Plagerson ◽  
Trudy Harpham ◽  
Angela Mathee

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-112
Author(s):  
Kirk McClure ◽  
Anne R. Williamson ◽  
Hye-Sung Han ◽  
Brandon Weiss

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) program remains the na- tion’s largest affordable housing production program. LIHTC units are under-represented in the neighborhoods that both promote movement to high- opportunity neighborhoods and affirmatively further fair housing. State and local officials should play an active role in guiding site selection decisions and ensuring that LIHTC developments are located in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Planners can use newly available data discussed herein to identify high-opportunity tracts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document