The burden of development impact fees

1990 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrejs Skaburskis
Keyword(s):  
Impact Fees ◽  
Development Impact Fees

Paying for Growth: Community Approaches to Development Impact Fees

1988 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Barnebey ◽  
Tom Macrostie ◽  
Gary J. Schoennauer ◽  
George T. Simpson ◽  
Jan Winters
Keyword(s):  
Impact Fees ◽  
Development Impact Fees

HOUSING, SPRAWL, AND THE USE OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES: THE CASE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
RANDY BLUFFSTONE ◽  
MATT BRAMAN ◽  
LINDA FERNANDEZ ◽  
TOM SCOTT ◽  
PEI-YI LEE
Keyword(s):  
Inland Empire ◽  
Impact Fees ◽  
Development Impact Fees

scholarly journals What Determines Public Support for Graduated Development Impact Fees?

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail M. York ◽  
Kevin Kane ◽  
Christopher M. Clark ◽  
Lauren E. Gentile ◽  
Amber Wutich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Management ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Property Taxes ◽  
Empirical Examination ◽  
Impact Fees ◽  
New Development ◽  
The Status ◽  
Development Impact Fees

The development impact fee is one growth management tool that is often adopted to reduce externalities associated with development on the urban fringe. But it is also used as a revenue generator that offsets property taxes. While graduated impact fees are a potential means to reduce sprawling development, it is unclear which public constituencies favor their adoption. Using an adjacent category logit model, there is limited evidence for exclusion based on race or class and, surprisingly, homeownership is not a major determinant of support. The model results indicate differences in policy preferences among longtime Phoenix residents, newcomers, city dwellers, and sub/exurbanites, which may suggest a desire to maintain the status quo and shift the burden of new development to developers and homebuyers. This article contributes to local government literature through an empirical examination of how sociodemographic factors drive public support for graduated development impact fees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document