Land-Use Planning and Natural Resource Rights: The Alberta Land Stewardship Act

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard J Roth ◽  
Rachel A Howie
Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 2401
Author(s):  
Ram P. Dahal ◽  
Robert K. Grala ◽  
Jason S. Gordon ◽  
Ian A. Munn ◽  
Daniel R. Petrolia

Open spaces, including waterfront areas, are critical to coastal communities and provide many benefits, including recreation opportunities, economic development, ecological benefits, and other ecosystem services. However, it is not clear how values of waterfront ecosystem services vary across geographical areas which prevents development and adoption of site-specific natural resource conservation plans and suitable long-term land management strategies. This study estimated the monetary value of distance to different waterfront types in coastal counties of Mississippi and Alabama (U.S.) using a geographically weighted regression (GWR) approach as an extension to a traditional hedonic pricing method (HPM). In addition, the study utilized publicly available data from the U.S. Census Bureau instead of certified rolls of county property assessors and Multiple Listing Service (MLS) data which can be costly and difficult to obtain. Residents valued most waterfront types which was reflected in greater assessed prices for houses in proximity to these waterfronts. However, the value of ecosystem services associated with waterfronts differed geospatially. The marginal implicit prices ranged from −$6343 to $6773 per km depending on a waterfront type. These estimates will be useful to city developers, land-use planners, and other stakeholders to make more informed and balanced decisions related to natural resource preservation associated with coastal areas, land-use planning, and zoning. In addition, information from this study can be used in developing healthy living environments where local economy can benefit from increased property tax revenues associated with waterfronts and their ecosystem services.


2020 ◽  
pp. 335-364
Author(s):  
C. D. Choudhary ◽  
B. K. Vimal ◽  
Shweta Shambhavi ◽  
Rajkishore Kumar

1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Bammi ◽  
D Bammi ◽  
R Paton

An optimizing land-use planning model (OPTPLAN) is used to minimize environmental impact. The development of the natural-resource objective function and natural-resource constraints is described. Application of the model to DuPage County, Illinois is shown. The model's output is transferred to maps and compared with a land-use plan obtained through conventional natural-resource methodology.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Lavelle

Recent amendments to the Alberta Land Stewardship Act (ALSA) are ambiguous, and the amended Act risks being interpreted in such a way as to undermine the purpose of Alberta’s Land-use Framework (LUF) and result in more land use planning controversy. The LUF is intended to ensure the future economic growth of the province balanced with the achievement of societal and environmental goods. The LUF can be understood as reflecting a modern liberal approach to land use planning such that government regulation is applied to all property, whether publicly or privately owned. This article argues that the resulting amendments are ambiguous and could be interpreted as reflecting a different understanding of property rights rooted in classical liberalism. The result is that the amended ALSA might not be interpreted in such a way that furthers the goals of the LUF. This article suggests that if the legislation is intended to implement the LUF, then any amendments to the ALSA should be unambiguously consistent with the underlying values of the LUF. It also suggests areas where the processes under the Act could be made more open and transparent so as to be more coherent with modern liberalism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document