Problem versus benefit focus: phrasing questions to enhance self-referencing and persuasion

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 1689-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsuan-Hsuan Ku ◽  
Chung-Yi Huang ◽  
Zu-Rong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Problem Versus

The Word Problem Versus the Isomorphism Problem

1984 ◽  
Vol s2-30 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. W. Glass ◽  
James J. Madden
Keyword(s):  
Word Problem ◽  
Isomorphism Problem ◽  
Problem Versus

scholarly journals Reading Strategies in Persian and English Languages and Their Influence on English Reading Comprehension Ability

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
M. Rahim Bohlooli Niri
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Short Circuit ◽  
Schema Theory ◽  
English Reading ◽  
Comprehension Ability ◽  
English Reading Comprehension ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Problem Versus ◽  
Reading Comprehension Ability

<p>The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship between successful readers’ strategies in Persian and English languages, and the impact of instruction of such strategies on English reading comprehension ability. The present study relies on Casanave’s (1998) expanded view of schema theory, the strategy schema, Goodman’s (1971) language transfer or linguistic independent hypothesis and Clarke’s idea of short-circuit or language ceiling hypothesis in ESL or EFL. This study also aims at finding an answer to the question of reading problem versus language problem, first raised by Alderson (1984, pp. 1-27) and then followed by Carrell (1991, pp. 159-179).</p>

Solitary behavior and friendly social activity: Differential gateways for conduct problem versus normal child-mother dyads

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Wahler ◽  
Marc E. Castellani ◽  
Greta D. Smith ◽  
Elizabeth A. Keathley
Keyword(s):  
Normal Child ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Conduct Problem ◽  
Solitary Behavior ◽  
Problem Versus

scholarly journals The integrable harmonic map problem versus Ricci flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 865 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei L. Lukyanov
Keyword(s):  
Ricci Flow ◽  
Harmonic Map ◽  
Problem Versus

Parfit on the Irrelevance of Deontological Distinctions

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-31
Author(s):  
F. M. Kamm
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Practical Reason ◽  
Practical Reasons ◽  
Case Based Reasoning ◽  
Moral Principles ◽  
Self Interest ◽  
Greater Good ◽  
Decisive Reason ◽  
Problem Versus ◽  
Case Based

This chapter concerns Derek Parfit’s discussion in his On What Matters, volume 3 of the irrelevance of deontological distinctions. Parfit begins by expressing his concern that morality will be undermined because practical reason, which tells us all things considered what to do, will often conflict with what we consider to be morally right. Unlike Sidgwick, Parfit does not begin by identifying morality with a part of impartial practical reason but rather with what he considers common sense deontology. Also, unlike Sidgwick, he thinks it is clear that sometimes self-interest (which provides some reason even impartially considered) is overridden by (other) impartial practical reasons (e.g., there is decisive reason to give one’s penny to save millions of other people). This chapter first considers how Parfit thinks one’s practical reason should reconcile concerns about self-sacrifice, pursuing the greater good, and morality. It then considers his use of case-based reasoning to undermine moral principles embodying such distinctions as harming versus not aiding, harming as a mere means versus as a side effect, and redirecting threats (as in the Trolley Problem) versus starting new ones.

scholarly journals The Dynamics of a One-Dimensional Parabolic Problem versus the Dynamics of Its Discretization

2000 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone M. Bruschi ◽  
Alexandre N. Carvalho ◽  
José G. Ruas-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Parabolic Problem ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Problem Versus

scholarly journals Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Practice Guidelines: Evaluation of Dysphagia

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 409-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan W Cockeram
Keyword(s):  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Organic Disease ◽  
Esophageal Dysmotility ◽  
Body Type ◽  
Mechanical Problem ◽  
Functional Abnormality ◽  
Mucosal Disease ◽  
Esophageal Dysphagia ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Problem Versus

Dysphagia may be defined as difficulty in swallowing. Dysphagia may be classified as oropharyngeal or esophageal; oropharyngeal dysphagia arises from a structural or functional abnormality in the oropharynx, and esophageal dysphagia occurs as a result of structural or functional abnormalities in the esophagus. Esophageal dysphagia may be further subclassified symptomatically as dysphagia for solids alone, which usually suggests a mechanical problem, versus dysphagia for liquids and solids, which is more suggestive of a neuromuscular problem. Dysphagia may be described by the patient as a sensation of food 'sticking' or as a sensation of food passing slowly through the esophagus. True dysphagia always indicates organic disease and always warrants investigation and consultation if no cause is found in initial studies. These symptoms should be distinguished from those of a persistent foreign body-type sensation or a sensation of a lump, which is more typical of globus sensation. Odynophagia, defined as pain with swallowing, may occur in association with esophageal dysmotility or as a result of mucosal disease in the esophagus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document