OPERA AND OBEDIENCE: THOMAS HOBBES ANDA PROPOSITION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF MORALITIEBY SIR WILLIAM DAVENANT

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES R. JACOB ◽  
TIMOTHY RAYLOR
Author(s):  
Margaret J. M. Ezell

The trial and execution of Charles I by Parliament generated many accounts ranging from ballads to Eikon Basilike, a text believed to have been written by Charles himself during his final days. Although debunked by John Milton’s Eikonoklastes, Eikon Basilike rapidly went through multiple illegal editions and was the center piece of the royalist belief that Charles was a royal martyr. Among many of the prominent literary figures in royalist exile on the continent were Abraham Cowley, Edmund Waller; Thomas Hobbes, who wrote Leviathan in Paris; and William Davenant, who created his new style epic poem Gondibert. The last three returned to England in the 1650s having made arrangements with the Puritan Parliament. Those royalist supporters who remained in England lived mostly quiet and retired lives outside of London and pursed literary and translation projects, including Katherine Philips, and Richard and Ann Fanshawe.


XVII-XVIII ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Franck Lessay
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-131
Author(s):  
Petar Bojanic
Keyword(s):  

(nemacki) Im Text wird zun?chst Hobbes' Interpretation des Verrats und des Hochverrats vorgestellt Hobbes versucht, zwei alte Institutionen des r?mischen Rechts seiner Zeit und dem Wissensstand in Theologie und Philosophie anzupassen. Die Figur des Verrats (and des Verr?ters) ist sehr bedeutsam im Kontext von Hobbes Verst?ndnis des Souver?ns und der Souver?nit?t. Der zentrale Abschnitt des Texts unternimmt den Versuch, im Rahmen von Hobbes' Begriff der Repr?sentation, ?ber den er im 16. Kapitel des "Leviathan" spricht, den Ursprung und die unbedingte Bedingung des Verrats als solchen aufzudecken. Der Akt des Verrats, in dem wir die verr?terische Geste (oder die Dynamik des Verrats) entdecken k?nnen, k?nnten in dem sogenannten Paradox der Repr?sentation und der Prokuration gefunden werden. Der Verr?ter unterbricht die Kette der ?bertragung der Macht und der Bem?chtigung, er hebt die Repr?sentation und das Sprechen im Namen eines anderen auf. Wie ist dies m?glich? Enth?lt das Sprechen und Handeln im eigenen Namen immer ein Element des Verrats?.


Author(s):  
Katarzyna Lecky

If maps are instruments of power, then it matters that in Renaissance Britain they were often found in the pockets of ordinary people. Pocket Maps and Public Poetry in the English Renaissance demonstrates how early modern British poets paid by the state adapted inclusive modes of nationhood charted by inexpensive, small-format maps. It places chapbooks (“cheapbooks”) by Edmund Spenser, Samuel Daniel, Ben Jonson, William Davenant, and John Milton into conversation with the portable cartography circulating in the same retail print industry. Domestic pocket maps were designed for heavy use by a broad readership that included those on the fringes of literacy. The era’s de facto laureates all banked their success as writers appealing to this burgeoning market share by drawing the nation as the property of the commonwealth rather than the Crown. This book investigates the accessible world of small-format cartography as it emerges in the texts of the poets raised in the expansive public sphere in which pocket maps flourished. It works at the intersections of space, place, and national identity to reveal the geographical imaginary shaping the flourishing business of cheap print. Its placement of poetic economies within mainstream systems of trade also demonstrates how cartography and poetry worked together to mobilize average consumers as political agents. This everyday form of geographic poiesis was also a strong platform for poets writing for monarchs and magistrates when their visions of the nation ran counter to the interests of the government.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document