Cortical and fibre tract interrelations in conduction aphasia

Aphasiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1151-1167
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Sidiropoulos ◽  
Tobias Bormann ◽  
Hermann Ackermann
1990 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bogousslavsky
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2098277
Author(s):  
Molly Jacobs ◽  
Patrick M Briley ◽  
Heather Harris Wright ◽  
Charles Ellis

Introduction Few studies have reported information related to the cost-effectiveness of traditional face-to-face treatments for aphasia. The emergence and demand for telepractice approaches to aphasia treatment has resulted in an urgent need to understand the costs and cost-benefits of this approach. Methods Eighteen stroke survivors with aphasia completed community-based aphasia telerehabilitation treatment, utilizing the Language-Oriented Treatment (LOT) delivered via Webex videoconferencing program. Marginal benefits to treatment were calculated as the change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) score pre- and post-treatment and marginal cost of treatment was calculated as the relationship between change in WAB-R aphasia quotient (AQ) and the average cost per treatment. Controlling for demographic variables, Bayesian estimation evaluated the primary contributors to WAB-R change and assessed cost-effectiveness of treatment by aphasia type. Results Thirteen out of 18 participants experienced significant improvement in WAB-R AQ following telerehabilitation delivered therapy. Compared to anomic aphasia (reference group), those with conduction aphasia had relatively similar levels of improvement whereas those with Broca’s aphasia had smaller improvement. Those with global aphasia had the largest improvement. Each one-point of improvement cost between US$89 and US$864 for those who improved (mean = US$200) depending on aphasia type/severity. Discussion Individuals with severe aphasia may have the greatest gains per unit cost from treatment. Both improvement magnitude and the cost per unit of improvement were driven by aphasia type, severity and race. Economies of scale to aphasia treatment–cost may be minimized by treating a variety of types of aphasia at various levels of severity.


1999 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Anderson ◽  
R. Gilmore ◽  
S. Roper ◽  
B. Crosson ◽  
R.M. Bauer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1225-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-L. Chiang ◽  
Y.-J. Chen ◽  
C.-Y. Shang ◽  
W.-Y. I. Tseng ◽  
S. S.-F. Gau

BackgroundThe relationship between white-matter tracts and executive functions (EF) in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has not been well studied and previous studies mainly focused on frontostriatal (FS) tracts. The authors explored the microstructural property of several fibre tracts hypothesized to be involved in EF, to correlate their microstructural property with EF, and to explore whether such associations differ between ADHD and typically developing (TD) youths.MethodWe assessed 45 youths with ADHD and 45 individually matched TD youths with a computerized test battery for multiple dimensions of EF. From magnetic resonance imaging, FS tract, superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), arcuate fasciculus (AF) and cingulum bundle (CB) were reconstructed by diffusion spectrum imaging tractography. The generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) values of white-matter tracts were computed to present microstructural property of each tract.ResultsWe found lower GFA in the left FS tract, left SLF, left AF and right CB, and poorer performance in set-shifting, sustained attention, cognitive inhibition and visuospatial planning in ADHD than TD. The ADHD and TD groups demonstrated different association patterns between EF and fibre tract microstructural property. Most of the EF were associated with microstructural integrity of the FS tract and CB in TD youths, while with that of the FS tract, SLF and AF in youths with ADHD.ConclusionsOur findings support that the SLF, AF and CB also involve in a wide range of EF and that the main fibre tracts involved in EF are different in youths with ADHD.


Cureus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A Garcia-Grimshaw ◽  
Francisco A Gutierrez-Manjarrez ◽  
Alejandra Gonzalez-Duarte

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
S.B. Buklina ◽  
V.Yu. Zhukov ◽  
S.A. Goryainov ◽  
A.I. Batalov ◽  
R.M. Afandiev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document