Wild Meat; Kid/nap

Wasafiri ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Roger Robinson
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Richard Bodmer ◽  
Pedro Mayor ◽  
Miguel Antunez ◽  
Tula Fang ◽  
Kimberlyn Chota ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Suárez ◽  
M. Morales ◽  
R. Cueva ◽  
V. Utreras Bucheli ◽  
G. Zapata-Ríos ◽  
...  

Oryx ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie van Vliet ◽  
Maria Quiceno ◽  
Jessica Moreno ◽  
Daniel Cruz ◽  
John E. Fa ◽  
...  

AbstractThe bushmeat trade in ecosystems in South America other than those within the Amazon basin is presumed to be insignificant, as alternative sources of protein (e.g. beef, chicken, fish) are considered to be more readily available in non-moist forests. However, studies and confiscation reports from countries such as Colombia suggest that bushmeat is consumed in a variety of ecosystems, although the nature of market chains, particularly in urban areas, is still unknown. We studied the urban bushmeat trade in markets in the five main ecoregions in Colombia. We recorded a total of 85 species, the most frequently traded being the paca Cuniculus paca, red brocket deer Mazama americana, grey brocket deer Mazama gouazoubira, capybara Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, armadillo Dasypus spp. and black agouti Dasyprocta fuliginosa. Most sales of wild meat occur through clandestine channels and involve a limited number of stakeholders. Bushmeat is a luxury product in urban areas of the Caribbean, the Pacific and the Andean regions. Further work is needed to quantify and monitor the volumes of bushmeat traded, comprehend motivations, explore ways of reducing threats, and engage with stakeholders to organize legal and sustainable use of bushmeat.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Mayor ◽  
Hani R. El Bizri ◽  
Thais Q. Morcatty ◽  
Kelly Moya ◽  
Nora Bendayán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 267-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Konecsni ◽  
Cheryl Scheller ◽  
Brad Scandrett ◽  
Patrik Buholzer ◽  
Alvin Gajadhar
Keyword(s):  

Rangifer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
V.M. Safronov

Three major herds of wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.), totaling over 200,000 animals, occur in the tundra and taiga of northern Yakutia. These herds have been expanding since the late 1950s and now occupy most of their historic range. In addition, several thousand wild reindeer occupy the New Siberian Islands and adjacent coastal mainland tundra, and there are about 60,000 largely sedentary forest reindeer in mountainous areas of the southern two-thirds of the province. Wild reindeer are commercially hunted throughout the mainland, and the production of wild meat is an important part of the economy of the province and of individual reindeer enterprises which produce both wild and domestic meat.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 2348-2355.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Maixner ◽  
Dmitrij Turaev ◽  
Amaury Cazenave-Gassiot ◽  
Marek Janko ◽  
Ben Krause-Kyora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bowler ◽  
Christopher Beirne ◽  
Mathias W Tobler ◽  
Matt Anderson ◽  
Anna DiPaola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1045-1066
Author(s):  
James McNamara ◽  
Elizabeth J. Z. Robinson ◽  
Katharine Abernethy ◽  
Donald Midoko Iponga ◽  
Hannah N. K. Sackey ◽  
...  

Abstract Wild animals play an integral and complex role in the economies and ecologies of many countries across the globe, including those of West and Central Africa, the focus of this policy perspective. The trade in wild meat, and its role in diets, have been brought into focus as a consequence of discussions over the origins of COVID-19. As a result, there have been calls for the closure of China’s “wet markets”; greater scrutiny of the wildlife trade in general; and a spotlight has been placed on the potential risks posed by growing human populations and shrinking natural habitats for animal to human transmission of zoonotic diseases. However, to date there has been little attention given to what the consequences of the COVID-19 economic shock may be for the wildlife trade; the people who rely on it for their livelihoods; and the wildlife that is exploited. In this policy perspective, we argue that the links between the COVID-19 pandemic, rural livelihoods and wildlife are likely to be more complex, more nuanced, and more far-reaching, than is represented in the literature to date. We develop a causal model that tracks the likely implications for the wild meat trade of the systemic crisis triggered by COVID-19. We focus on the resulting economic shockwave, as manifested in the collapse in global demand for commodities such as oil, and international tourism services, and what this may mean for local African economies and livelihoods. We trace the shockwave through to the consequences for the use of, and demand for, wild meats as households respond to these changes. We suggest that understanding and predicting the complex dynamics of wild meat use requires increased collaboration between environmental and resource economics and the ecological and conservation sciences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document