scholarly journals Evaluation of the nutrient status and forage quality of the hippo grass (Vossia cuspidata (Roxb.) Griff.) along Ismailia canal, Egypt

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Tarek M. Galal ◽  
Fatma A. Gharib ◽  
Hatim M. Al-Yasi ◽  
Khalid H. Mansour ◽  
Montaser M. Hassan
Crop Science ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Lenssen ◽  
E. L. Sorensen ◽  
G. L. Posler ◽  
D. L. Stuteville
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Glenn ◽  
Rene Tanner ◽  
Seiichi Miyamoto ◽  
Kevin Fitzsimmons ◽  
John Boyer

Crop Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1917-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Biewer ◽  
Thomas Fricke ◽  
Michael Wachendorf

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Monika Henschke ◽  
Ewelina Wojciechowska ◽  
Agnieszka Błaszyk ◽  
Katarzyna Araszkiewicz

An experiment on the effect of Osmocote fertilizers on growth and nutrient status of <em>Carex buchananii</em> was conducted in the years 2008–2009. <em>Carex buchananii</em> is a dense-tufted sedge growing up to 60 cm in height, with very narrow, stiff, red, copper and olive colored leaves throughout the season. Plants were grown in a greenhouse in pots with peat substrate for 18 weeks. The differentiating factors included the type of fertilizer, i.e. Exact Standard 16:11:11 and Osmocote Exact High Start 11:11:19, and fertilizer application rates of 2 and 4 g dm<sup>−3</sup>, the phase of growth, i.e. 1 to 9 weeks and 9 to 18 weeks of culture. The greatest increment in the tuft circumference of <em>C. buchananii</em> was recorded in the first 9 weeks of culture, while that of the fresh weight of aboveground parts – in the period from 9 to 18 weeks. The application of Osmocote Exact High Start at 4 g dm<sup>−3</sup> in the culture of <em>C. buchananii</em> resulted in the production of the desired quality of the plants with a greater tuft circumference and shorter leaves. It was shown that best quality plants contained in their aboveground parts the following amounts of macronutrients and sodium (g kg<sup>−1</sup>): N – 18.9, P – 3.5, K – 37.2, Ca – 5.8, Mg – 3.0, and Na – 0.3.


2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. McGraw ◽  
W. Terrell Stamps ◽  
James H. Houx ◽  
Marc J. Linit

Author(s):  
GMM Islam ◽  
SK Tarafder ◽  
ABMM Hasan ◽  
SMA Iqbal ◽  
H Mamtaz

A study was conducted in Monirampur upazila under Jessore district from July to December, 2016 to collect information on names, numbers and comparative availability of different brands of Zinc fertilizers in order to aid the assessment of nutrient status for quality of the brands. For this purpose, information was collected from 54 randomly selected fertilizer shops (20 BCIC fertilizer dealers and 34 retailers) through questionnaire interview. In the study total 77 brands [41 Zinc sulfate (mono), 11 Zinc sulfate (hepta) and 25 Chelated zinc] of zinc fertilizer marketed by 49 companies were found in the upazila. Zingsul, Mim zinc, Grogin, Bumper mono zinc, Eon zinc and Geel mono of Zinc sulfate (mono) brands, Topaz of Zinc sulfate (hepta) brands and Mim zinc gold of Chelated zinc brands were mostly available. “Grogin” of Zinc sulfate (mono) and “Topaz” of Zinc sulfate (hepta) were the top most available. Ten percent of Zinc sulfate (hepta) mentioned no registration number. There was a significant difference between highest and lowest MRP of all types (imported, supplied and manufactured) of Zinc sulfate (mono) and Zinc sulfate (hepta) fertilizer as well as imported Chelated zinc brands.Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. & Tech. 7 (2): 57-62, December, 2017


2020 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 106929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd J. Berauer ◽  
Peter A. Wilfahrt ◽  
Björn Reu ◽  
Max A. Schuchardt ◽  
Noelia Garcia-Franco ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document