Selective Interference with Verbal Short-Term Memory for Serial Order Information: A New Paradigm and Tests of a Timing-Signal Hypothesis

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1307-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Henson ◽  
Tom Hartley ◽  
Neil Burgess ◽  
Graham Hitch ◽  
Brenda Flude
Aphasiology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 355-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Attout ◽  
Marie-Anne Van der Kaa ◽  
Mercédès George ◽  
Steve Majerus

Dyslexia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Cowan ◽  
Tiffany P. Hogan ◽  
Mary Alt ◽  
Samuel Green ◽  
Kathryn L. Cabbage ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 59 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brita Elvevåg ◽  
Joscelyn E Fisher ◽  
Terry E Goldberg

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brita Elvevåg ◽  
Daniel R. Weinberger ◽  
Terry E. Goldberg

1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 877-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Rohrman ◽  
John C. Jahnke

A total of 300 university students were presented a brief list of non-alphanumeric items and instructed to recall immediately either the items (free recall, FR), the order in which the items were presented (order recall, OR), or both (serial recall, SR). Presentation rate and retention interval were additional experimental variables in Exp. I and II, respectively. In both experiments significant differences in recall were found between FR conditions and the remaining two, which did not differ from each other. More items were recalled at the slow than fas: rate. Retention interval was not a significant variable. Results suggest that retention will improve when order information is eliminated from recall (Brown, 1958), that the recall of item and order information involve at least partially independent memory processes, and that, while the recall of items may proceed independently of the recall of their order, the converse is not true.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Maylor ◽  
Janet I. Vousden ◽  
Gordon D. A. Brown

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2570-2593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Majerus ◽  
Arnaud D'Argembeau ◽  
Trecy Martinez Perez ◽  
Sanaâ Belayachi ◽  
Martial Van der Linden ◽  
...  

Although many neuroimaging studies have considered verbal and visual short-term memory (STM) as relying on neurally segregated short-term buffer systems, the present study explored the existence of shared neural correlates supporting verbal and visual STM. We hypothesized that networks involved in attentional and executive processes, as well as networks involved in serial order processing, underlie STM for both verbal and visual list information, with neural specificity restricted to sensory areas involved in processing the specific items to be retained. Participants were presented sequences of nonwords or unfamiliar faces, and were instructed to maintain and recognize order or item information. For encoding and retrieval phases, null conjunction analysis revealed an identical fronto-parieto-cerebellar network comprising the left intraparietal sulcus, bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the bilateral cerebellum, irrespective of information type and modality. A network centered around the right intraparietal sulcus supported STM for order information, in both verbal and visual modalities. Modality-specific effects were observed in left superior temporal and mid-fusiform areas associated with phonological and orthographic processing during the verbal STM tasks, and in right hippocampal and fusiform face processing areas during the visual STM tasks, wherein these modality effects were most pronounced when storing item information. The present results suggest that STM emerges from the deployment of modality-independent attentional and serial ordering processes toward sensory networks underlying the processing and storage of modality-specific item information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document