Comparative seed resistance in eighty cowpea accessions to the seed bruchid,Callosobruchus maculatus(Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (15) ◽  
pp. 1806-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M. Azeez ◽  
O.O.R. Pitan
2020 ◽  
pp. 33-44
Author(s):  
Owolabi Moshood Azeez ◽  
Adebola Adedoyin Osipitan ◽  
Isaac Oludayo Daniel ◽  
Olufemi Olutoyin Richard Pitan

An integrated pest management scheme involving seed resistance and the application of powder of Cymbopogon citratus, Alstonia boonei, Hyptis suaveolens, Azadirachta indica, Loranthus braunii and Lycopersicum esculentum as protectant against the seed bettle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius), was evaluated in the laboratory at ambient temperature (29±3°C) and relative humidity (65±5%). Six resistant cowpea accessions selected from previous studies were treated with the six plant powders at 1.25% w/w in a 6×7 factorial arrangement fitted into a completely randomized design with five replicates. Seed treatment with any of the six plant powders on six accessions resulted in significantly higher adult mortality, lower oviposition rate, adult emergence inhibition, lower seed damage and higher seed germination over the control, Protection ability of the plant powders was influenced by the cowpea accessions used.


1983 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 681 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ Redden ◽  
P Dobie ◽  
AMR Gatehouse

Bioassays for bruchid emergence on cowpea seeds were conducted on the parent, hybrid F1, F2, F3, and backcross seed generations of five crosses between susceptible cowpea lines and the resistant accession TVu 2027. The study was repeated with reciprocal F1 hybrid seeds, and reciprocal backcross hybrid seeds. For the latter, the mean day of bruchid emergence was also measured. F3 seed from individual F2 plants of one reciprocal cross were also bioassayed. Trypsin inhibitor determinations were made on the parental, reciprocal F1 and reciprocal and non-reciprocal F3 seed generations. The results indicated: (1) that the expression of resistance is mainly determined by the maternal genotype; (2) that resistance may be inherited as a major gene effect, with resistance recessive, and with the presence of modifier genes of different effects in different crosses; (3) that a cytoplasmic effect appears to be absent; (4) that a paternal or embryo genotypic effect on seed resistance can be detected in a certain backcross combination; (5) that trypsin inhibitors are partly associated with expression of resistance, but are uncorrelated in F2 segregation, and appear to be quantitatively inherited and variable between crosses. Thus additional mechanisms so far undetected may also be implicated in the expression of seed resistance to bruchids.


1987 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Rusoke ◽  
T. Fatunla

SummaryTwo seed-resistant land races were crossed to a seed-susceptible cultivar to produce Fl, F2, BC1; and BC2 generations. It was observed that seed resistance was conditioned by two unlinked recessive genes and cytoplasmic factors. Similarly, generations derived from a pod-resistant, seed-susceptible cultivar with a seed-resistant, pod-susceptible land race demonstrated that seed and pod resistance are independently inherited.


1983 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 697 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Redden

Seed from F3 generation plants of two reciprocal crosses were evaluated for bruchid resistance, over 28 F3 families of four plants each plus an additional five plants each in 10-11 families. The variables, percentage adult emergence for a specified period and mean time to emergence, agreed with respect to describing segregation in the resistant, intermediate and susceptible categories. Resistance was expressed as a recessive character. No differences between families from reciprocal crosses were detected. There was evidence for digenic control of resistance in one cross and for monogenic control in the other, in conjunction with one, or more, modifier or minor gene loci. There was general agreement between the results for the F3 generation study and a previous study on the F2 generation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Tarver ◽  
R.E. Shade ◽  
R.D. Tarver ◽  
Y. Liang ◽  
G. Krishnamurthi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Francimauro S. Morais ◽  
Kirley M. Canuto ◽  
Paulo R. V. Ribeiro ◽  
Alison B. Silva ◽  
Otilia D. L. Pessoa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document