Interspecific Pollen Transfer: Magnitude, Prevalence and Consequences for Plant Fitness

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina L. Morales ◽  
Anna Traveset
1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Harder ◽  
Mitchell B. Cruzan ◽  
James D. Thomson

To determine whether interspecific pollen transfer could reduce seed production by two sympatric lilies, Erythronium albidum and Erythronium americanum, we hand-pollinated flowers with mixtures of conspecific and heterospecific pollen. These species exhibited typical unilateral interspecific incompatibility, i.e., pollen tubes from the self-infertile species (E. americanum) grew apparently unimpeded in styles of the self-fertile species (E. albidum), whereas the reverse cross resulted in an incompatibility reaction. Because of this asymmetrical relation and faster growth by heterospecific pollen tubes in E. albidum stigmas than by conspecific tubes, pollination with abundant heterospecific pollen reduced fruit and seed production by E. albidum, but not by E. americanum, as long as the stigma also received some conspecific pollen. Unilateral incompatibility could benefit self-infertile species in reproductive interactions with closely related self-fertile species; however, this benefit remains to be demonstrated for naturally pollinated plants. Key words: Erythronium albidum, Erythronium americanum, interspecific pollen transfer, pollination, unilateral incompatibility.


Flora ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 204 (10) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Korinna Esfeld ◽  
Marcus A. Koch ◽  
Timotheüs van der Niet ◽  
Merav Seifan ◽  
Mike Thiv

Author(s):  
Pat Willmer

This chapter examines brood site mutualisms, where the pollinators are florivores. In brood site mutualisms, the pollinators are sometimes referred to as nursery pollinators. Here pollination success affects not only plant fitness but also pollinator fitness, and the balance between costs and benefits may be highly variable from place to place and across seasons. There are at least thirteen known nursery pollination systems, and this phenomenon can be divided into three categories. Two of these are relatively unspecialized, where beetle or lepidopteran larvae develop in decomposing flower heads, or where thrips feed in flowers as pollen parasites. The third category is termed “active pollination,” also known as “seed-eating pollination syndrome.” The chapter first considers nursery pollination and thrips as pollen parasites before discussing active pollination, where active pollen transfer occurs and a clear mutualism results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Isaac Moreira-Hernández ◽  
Nathan Muchhala

Understanding how pollen moves between species is critical to understanding speciation, diversification, and evolution of flowering plants. For co-flowering species that share pollinators, competition through interspecific pollen transfer (IPT) can profoundly impact floral evolution, decreasing female fitness via heterospecific pollen deposition on stigmas and male fitness via pollen misplacement during visits to heterospecific flowers. The pollination literature demonstrates that such reproductive interference frequently selects for reproductive character displacement in floral traits linked to pollinator attraction, pollen placement, and mating systems and has also revealed that IPT between given pairs of species is typically asymmetric. More recent work is starting to elucidate its importance to the speciation process, clarifying the link between IPT and current and historical patterns of hybridization, the evolution of phenotypic novelty through adaptive introgression, and the rise of reproductive isolation. Our review aims to stimulate further research on IPT as a ubiquitous mechanism that plays a central role in angiosperm diversification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document