Transition Programming for Youth with Persistent Delinquent Histories: A Descriptive Case Example

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-191
Author(s):  
Sara C. McDaniel ◽  
Coddy Carter
1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Luce ◽  
Kathleen Dyer

Legal mandates, widely postulated professional perspective, and improved teaching techniques have strongly influenced the kind of care provided individuals with significant developmental disabilities such as autism. Children and adults who would have been separated from their families and peers two decades ago are now expected to live in natural settings identical to the settings in which other members of their families live. The conversion of services to correspond with the ever increasing lifestyle expectations for persons with developmental disabilities is described from an organizational perspective with reference to serving these individuals in special education classrooms, residential settings, or other human service settings. Systems we have found effective in moving individuals through a continuum of services are described. Specific examples of implementation strategies in a large comprehensive treatment center for individuals with developmental and neurological disabilities are provided. An example of a wide-scale conversion of an agency that resulted in more progressive transition programming is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Amy Armstrong-Heimsoth ◽  
Molly Hahn-Floyd ◽  
Heather J. Williamson ◽  
Catherine Lockmiller

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-193
Author(s):  
Edwin Obilo Achola

Translating multicultural research and theory into practices that improve transition outcomes for all children especially, youth who come from predominantly culturally and ethnically diverse (CED) communities, remains a substantial challenge for career transition specialists (CTSs) today. The purpose of this article was to consider the state of transition programming for CED youth with disabilities, paying particular attention to the clinical applications of Banks’s dimensions of multicultural pedagogy in addressing inequities in transition programming. In light of this discussion, a set of five research- and practice-based tips for CTSs, special education teachers, and other members of individualized transition teams are shared.


Author(s):  
Iva Strnadová

Transition planning can increase positive post-school outcomes and inclusion for students with intellectual disabilities. Kohler’s Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0 is a useful tool for all stakeholders engaged in transition planning for this population. Grounded in research, the Taxonomy highlights five key practices: (a) student-focused planning; (b) student development; (c) interagency collaboration; (d) family involvement; and (e) program structures and attributes. Student-focused planning, and especially the student’s active involvement in transition planning, tend to be forgotten when it comes to students with intellectual disabilities. While transition planning is oriented toward positive post-school outcomes in areas such as employment, independent living, and education, there are still two areas that remain largely ignored for students with intellectual disabilities—self-advocacy and sexuality education. Teachers, parents, and other relevant stakeholders need to provide more opportunities for development of self-advocacy skills, and for sexuality education. Kohler’s Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0 can serve as a useful tool when planning on how to integrate these two areas into transition-focused education.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana L. Collet-Klingenberg ◽  
Sharon M. Kolb

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia de Pee ◽  
Regina Moench-Pfanner ◽  
Elviyanti Martini ◽  
Stanley H. Zlotkin ◽  
Ian Darnton-Hill ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Suzanne DelBoccio ◽  
Debra Smith ◽  
Melissa Hicks ◽  
Pamela Lowe ◽  
Joy Graves-Rust ◽  
...  

The 2013 addition of the Care Transition Measures to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey; enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010); and a greater focus on population health have brought a heightened awareness and need for action with patient transitions. Data are emerging from the additional Care Transition Measures and benchmarks have been developed. This article briefly describes the context of care transition. We describe the journey of Indiana University Health North Hospital to overcome patient care transition obstacles, ultimately achieving designation as a top performer. We will discuss our efforts to personalize patient outcomes and transition through activation and improve transitions for vulnerable populations, specifically in the bariatric and orthopedic patient populations. The article concludes with discussion of overcoming obstacles and future directions with continued focus on collaboration and improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document