The word length effect in backward recall: the role of response modality

Memory ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-700
Author(s):  
Jean Saint-Aubin ◽  
Olivia Beaudry ◽  
Dominic Guitard ◽  
Myriam Pâquet ◽  
Katherine Guérard
1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1055-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Caplan ◽  
Gloria S. Waters

We report a partial replication of previous results by Caplan, Rochon, and Waters (1992), using methods that address objections raised by Baddeley and Andrade (this issue) and that improve on several techniques used by them. The results cast doubts on the role of articulation in determining the word length effect in span, and hence on the role of articulation in rehearsal.


2011 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surprenant ◽  
Brown ◽  
Jalbert ◽  
Neath ◽  
Bireta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110171
Author(s):  
Marc Brysbaert ◽  
Longjiao Sui ◽  
Wouter Duyck ◽  
Nicolas Dirix

Previous research in English has suggested that reading rate predictions can be improved considerably by taking average word length into account. In the present study, we investigated whether the same regularity holds for Dutch. The Dutch language is very similar to English, but words are on average half a letter longer: 5.1 letters per word (in non-fiction) instead of 4.6. We collected reading rates of 62 participants reading 12 texts with varying word lengths, and examined which change in the English equation accounts for the Dutch findings. We observed that predictions were close to the best fitting curve as soon as the average English word length was replaced by the average Dutch word length. The equation predicts that Dutch texts with an average word length of 5.1 letters will be read at a rate of 238 word per minute (wpm). Texts with an average word length of 4.5 letter will be read at 270 wpm, and texts with an average word length of 6.0 letters will be read at a rate of 202 wpm. The findings are in line with the assumption that the longer words in Dutch do not slow down silent reading relative to English and that the word length effect observed in each language is due to word processing effort and not to low-level, visual factors.


Memory ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Tehan ◽  
Georgina Anne Tolan

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p7698 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Eklinder Björnström ◽  
Charlotte Hills ◽  
Hashim Hanif ◽  
Jason J S Barton

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 36-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierluigi Zoccolotti ◽  
Maria De Luca ◽  
Anna Judica ◽  
Cristina Burani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document