Evaluate the Understandability of Information Display Board Signs Using a Driving Simulator Experiment

Author(s):  
Pei Wang ◽  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Xiao Zhou ◽  
Sanaz Motamedi ◽  
Ching-Yao Chan
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 186-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tanadumrongpattana ◽  
A. Suethakorn ◽  
S. Mitatha ◽  
C. Vongchumyen

1979 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger M. Heeler ◽  
Chike Okechuku ◽  
Stan Reid

Three methods of obtaining attribute importance—conjoint measurement, self (questionnaire) report, and information display board—are compared and found to yield contrasting results. The results of multiattribute models, and determinant attribute and tradeoff analyses would depend on the method of measurement used. The information display board is hypothesized to yield a measure of greater face validity than the other two methods.


Author(s):  
Talia Lavie ◽  
Joachim Meyer ◽  
Klaus-Josef Bengler ◽  
Joseph F. Coughlin

Route guidance systems are predominant examples for in-vehicle telematic systems. The format in which the information is presented in these systems determines the ease of interacting with the system and may influence driving performance. An experiment compared the effects of a table, a separable bar graph and an integrated object display on the time required for route selection, driving performance and subjective evaluations of route guidance information. The integrated display was superior in performance times and participants' preferences and led to the least lane deviations in a driving simulator study. The tabular display led to the most accurate performance. The study provides information on issues related to information display in telematic systems and on the effects the display and system use may have on driving performance. These issues need to be taken into account when designing next generation telematic systems.


1980 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald R. Lehmann ◽  
William L. Moore ◽  
Gilbert A. Churchill

An experiment was done in which subjects acquired information on, made choices among, and consumed their choices of five health breads once a week for six weeks. Information acquisition was monitored by means of an information display board (IDB). Validity of the method was assessed by comparing actual information acquisition with hypotheses based on theory and/or empirical evidence. This method showed reasonable construct validity. The amount of information acquired declined significantly between each pair of adjoining choice occasions. The introduction of a new brand in the fourth week did not increase total acquisition, but shifted the search primarily to the new brand. Similarly, announcement of a price reduction on one bread did not increase total acquisition, but shifted information acquisition to the reduced-price brand and to the prices of the other brands.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guihua Yang ◽  
Farnaz Baniahmad ◽  
Beverly K. Jaeger ◽  
Ronald R. Mourant
Keyword(s):  

CICTP 2019 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanfang Zhang ◽  
Kun Zhao ◽  
Xuekun Wang ◽  
Shuo Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document