Analyzing Households’ Dependency on Non-timber Forest Products, Poverty Alleviation Potential, and Socioeconomic Drivers: Evidence from Metema and Quara Districts in the Dry Forests of Amhara Region, Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Yibeltal Walle ◽  
Diptimayee Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Amhara Region ◽  
Dry Forests ◽  
Socioeconomic Drivers ◽  
Non Timber Forest Products

scholarly journals Status, Prospects and Challenges for Non-Timber Forest Products Conservation in Nepal: A Critical Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Pramod Ghimire ◽  
Nabaraj Pudasaini ◽  
Uchita Lamichhane
Keyword(s):  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Sustainable Management ◽  
Conservation Status ◽  
Rural Poverty ◽  
Rural Livelihoods ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Biological Origin ◽  
Global Demand ◽  
Non Timber Forest Products ◽  
Over Exploitation

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) consist of goods of biological origin other than wood, derived from forests, other wooded land and trees outside forests. The importance of NTFPs for sustaining rural livelihoods, fostering rural poverty alleviation, enhancing biodiversity conservation, and facilitating rural economic growth is well known in Nepal. In spite of these facts, NTFPs have not received the sustained and systematic support. With the gradual rise in population, unsustainable harvesting and depletion of resources, sustainable management of NTFPs has become a challenge. Similarly, the increasing global demand of NTFPs leads to over-exploitation of these resources that further leads to dwindling and adversely affecting the biodiversity. In this context, this paper intends to explore and analyze the conservation status, prospects and challenges for efficient and sustainable management of NTFPs in the context of Nepal.

Non-timber Forest Products and their Contribution to Poverty Alleviation and Forest Conservation in Mbulu and Babati Districts-Tanzania

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Giliba ◽  
Zacharia J. Lupala ◽  
Celestine Mafuru ◽  
Canisius Kayombo ◽  
Patrick Mwendwa
Keyword(s):  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Forest Conservation ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Non Timber Forest Products

scholarly journals Evaluating the potential contribution of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to smallholder farmers in semi-arid and arid regions: A case of Chivi, Zimbabwe

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kupurai ◽  
Andrew Tapiwa Kugedera ◽  
Nyasha Sakadzo
Keyword(s):  
Food Security ◽  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Poverty Alleviation ◽  
Arid Regions ◽  
Smallholder Farmers ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
Rain Season ◽  
Non Timber Forest Products ◽  
Semi Arid

Food insecurity in most dry regions in Zimbabwe has taught many people a lesson of using non timber forest products (NTFPs) to reduce food insecurity and improve livelihoods as well as poverty alleviation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential contribution of non-timber forest products to smallholder farmers in arid and semi-arid regions. The research was carried out as a survey and data was collected using interviews, questionnaires and focus group discussion. Data was analysed for descriptive statistics using IBM SPSS version 25. Results indicated that 64 % were females and 36 % were males with the majority of participants being married (57.6 %) with only 8.8 % being widowed. Results show that all respondents (100%) indicated that they obtain fruits from the forests as major source of food during winter and rain season. Vegetables (84.2 %), thatching grass (80.8%) and edible worms (62.5 %) were also major non-timber forest products obtained from the forests by participants. All participants (100%) indicated that income generation, firewood and source of heat for brick moulding were major benefits they obtain from forest with vegetables (74.2 %), brooms (91.7 %) and improved nutrition (85.0 %) being regarded as other important benefits enjoyed by local people from forests. Afforestation and reforestation were regarded as major sustainable forest management practices by all (100%) participants with agroforestry being indicated by only 12.5 % since people had no knowledge about it. NTFPs has capacity of improving food security, human livelihoods and alleviate poverty. People are encouraged to harvest NTFPs sustainably to allow future use. Use of agroforestry can be a best way for managing forests sustainably, improve food security, crop yield, poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation.

Illegal rattan extraction trends in the Ankasa Conservation Area in Ghana

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
R. Obour, D. Amankwaa, A. Asare
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Snowball Sampling ◽  
Conservation Area ◽  
Forest Reserve ◽  
The North ◽  
Non Timber Forest Products

Protected Areas (PAs) are created for the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, but many of Ghana’s PAs are subjectto severe pressures and threats, the main pressures being the illegal extraction of natural resources. Rattans are indisputablyone of the most important Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) in Ghana’s Protected Areas that is without doubt one of thereasons for which it has drawn the attention of researchers. In this study the illegal rattan extraction patterns in the AnkasaConservation Area (ACA) in Ghana was inspected. Simple random sampling and Snowball sampling techniques were used. Datacollection employed the use of semi-structured questionnaires, interviews and field enumeration of rattans as well as an analysisof Effective Patrol Man-days (EPMDS) from 2004 to 2012. The results showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.75, p<0.05, r2 = 0.557) between patrol effort and rattan extraction encounters. In addition, there was a general reduction in illegalrattan extraction encounters from 2004 to 2012 at a rate of 4.3 per year. The highest illegal rattan extraction incidences wererecorded in 2006 (76 encounters), 2005 (35 encounters), 2008 (22 encounters), 2004 (18 encounters) and the least incidencewere recorded in both 2010 (3 encounters) and 2011 (3 encounters).The research also revealed that Eremospatha macrocarpawas the most extracted rattan species followed by Laccosperma secundiflorum. The major rattan extraction and trade routesoriginate in the northern parts and in the area east of the reserve and also south of Draw River Forest Reserve. Generally, rattanpoaching in Ankasa Conservation Area has declined, but there are still human incursions in the northern part of the reserve. Thestudy recommended an intensification of patrols in the north of the reserve. Also, enrichment planting and Agroforestry practicesof inter-cropping rattans with seasonal crops should be pursued vigorously for the local communities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document