scholarly journals Flexible airway endoscopy in esophageal atresia patients undergoing colon interposition

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-272
Author(s):  
Aliaa Rabie ◽  
Mohamed El Debeiky ◽  
Tamer Ghoneim ◽  
Ahmed Khairi ◽  
Ahmed Ezzat Mrzouk Saad El-Rouby
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2311-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Hartin ◽  
Mauricio A. Escobar ◽  
Sani Z. Yamout ◽  
Michael G. Caty

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-166
Author(s):  
Elisa Pani ◽  
Enrico Ciardini ◽  
Elisa Severi ◽  
Noemi Cantone ◽  
Francesca Tocchioni ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chantal A ten Kate ◽  
Anne-Fleur R L van Hal ◽  
Nicole S Erler ◽  
Michail Doukas ◽  
Suzan Nikkessen ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Background Endoscopic surveillance of adults with esophageal atresia is advocated, but the optimal surveillance strategy remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide recommendations on appropriate starting age and intervals of endoscopic surveillance in adults with esophageal atresia. Methods Participants underwent standardized upper endoscopies with biopsies. Surveillance intervals of 3–5 years were applied, depending on age and histopathological results. Patient’s age and time to development of (pre)malignant lesions were calculated. Results A total of 271 patients with esophageal atresia (55% male; median age at baseline endoscopy 26.7 (range 15.6–68.5) years; colon interposition n = 17) were included. Barrett’s esophagus was found in 19 (7%) patients (median age 32.3 (17.8–56.0) years at diagnosis). Youngest patient with a clinically relevant Barrett’s esophagus was 20.9 years. Follow-up endoscopies were performed in 108 patients (40%; median follow-up time 4.6 years). During surveillance, four patients developed Barrett’s esophagus but no dysplasia or cancer was found. One 45-year-old woman with a colon interposition developed an adenoma with high-grade dysplasia which was radically removed. Two new cases of esophageal carcinoma were diagnosed in patients (55 and 66 years old) who were not under surveillance. One of them had been curatively treated for esophageal carcinoma 13 years ago. Conclusions This study shows that endoscopic screening of patients with esophageal atresia, including those with a colon interposition, can be started at 20 years of age. Up to the age of 40 years a surveillance interval of 10 years appeared to be safe. Endoscopic surveillance may also be warranted for patients after curative esophageal cancer treatment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 420-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Zwaveling ◽  
Henk Groen ◽  
David Van der Zee ◽  
Jan Hulscher ◽  
Gabriele Gallo

Author(s):  
S Kehl ◽  
TM Völkl ◽  
F Baier ◽  
T Hildebrandt ◽  
MW Beckmann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Enrica Miscia ◽  
Giuseppe Lauriti ◽  
Dacia Di Renzo ◽  
Angela Riccio ◽  
Gabriele Lisi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Esophageal atresia (EA) is associated with duodenal atresia (DA) in 3 to 6% of cases. The management of this association is controversial and literature is scarce on the topic. Materials and Methods We aimed to (1) review the patients with EA + DA treated at our institution and (2) systematically review the English literature, including case series of three or more patients. Results Cohort study: Five of seventy-four patients with EA had an associated DA (6.8%). Four of five cases (80%) underwent primary repair of both atresia, one of them with gastrostomy placement (25%). One of five cases (20%) had a delayed diagnosis of DA. No mortality has occurred. Systematic Review: Six of six-hundred forty-five abstract screened were included (78 patients). Twenty-four of sixty-eight (35.3%) underwent primary correction of EA + DA, and 36/68 (52.9%) underwent staged correction. Nine of thirty-six (25%) had a missed diagnosis of DA. Thirty-six of sixty-eight underwent gastrostomy placement. Complications were observed in 14/36 patients (38.9 ± 8.2%). Overall mortality reported was 41.0 ± 30.1% (32/78 patients), in particular its incidence was 41.7 ± 27.0% after a primary treatment and 37.0 ± 44.1% following a staged approach. Conclusion The management of associated EA and DA remains controversial. It seems that the staged or primary correction does not affect the mortality. Surgeons should not overlook DA when correcting an EA.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keramettin Ugur Ozkan ◽  
Yusuf Kenan Coban ◽  
Murat Uzel ◽  
Mehmet Ergun ◽  
Hafize Oksuz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document