scholarly journals Configural processing in face recognition in schizophrenia

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara L. Schwartz ◽  
Cherie L. Marvel ◽  
Amy Drapalski ◽  
Richard B. Rosse ◽  
Stephen I. Deutsch
2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jisien Yang ◽  
Adrian Schwaninger

Configural processing has been considered the major contributor to the face inversion effect (FIE) in face recognition. However, most researchers have only obtained the FIE with one specific ratio of configural alteration. It remains unclear whether the ratio of configural alteration itself can mediate the occurrence of the FIE. We aimed to clarify this issue by manipulating the configural information parametrically using six different ratios, ranging from 4% to 24%. Participants were asked to judge whether a pair of faces were entirely identical or different. The paired faces that were to be compared were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2). Both experiments revealed that the FIE was observed only when the ratio of configural alteration was in the intermediate range. These results indicate that even though the FIE has been frequently adopted as an index to examine the underlying mechanism of face processing, the emergence of the FIE is not robust with any configural alteration but dependent on the ratio of configural alteration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mike Burton ◽  
Stefan R. Schweinberger ◽  
Rob Jenkins ◽  
Jürgen M. Kaufmann

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxane J. Itier ◽  
Margot J. Taylor

The effects of configural changes on faces were investigated in children to determine their role in encoding and recognition processes. Upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed unfamiliar faces were presented in blocks in which one-third of the pictures repeated immediately or after one intervening face. Subjects (8–16 years) responded to repeated faces; eventrelated potentials were recorded throughout the procedure. Recognition improved steadily with age and all components studied showed age effects reflecting differing maturation processes occurring until adulthood. All children were affected by inversion and contrast-reversal, and face-type effects were seen on latencies and amplitudes of early components (P1 and N170), as well as on later frontal amplitudes. The “old-new” repetition effects (larger amplitude for repeated stimuli) were found at frontal sites and were similar across age groups and face types, suggesting a general working memory system comparably involved in all age groups. These data demonstrate that (1) there is quantitative development in face processing, (2) both face encoding and recognition improve with age, but (3) only encoding is affected by configural changes. The data also suggest a gradual tuning of face processing towards the upright orientation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 602-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Schwaninger ◽  
S. M. Collishaw ◽  
J. Lobmaier

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine L. Reed ◽  
Paula M. Beall ◽  
Daniel N. McIntosh

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Leder

The highly specialised skill of face recognition found in humans is thought to be dependent on the processing of a combination of edge-based and surface-based information, and of single-feature as well as of configural information. An investigation was carried out into how the saliency of facial information differs between faces presented as line drawings and the same faces presented as photographs. In experiment 1, the participants showed a decreased sensitivity in their detection of changed configural properties if the faces were presented as line drawings. In experiment 2 an investigation was carried out into whether distinctiveness due to configural properties loses its impact on recognition when faces are transformed to line drawings. For each of twenty unfamiliar male faces, a more ‘distinctive’ version was created by moving the eye region down. The increase of distinctiveness was confirmed in a rating phase. In a later recognition test, with the same stimuli presented either as line drawings or as photographs, the more distinctive stimuli produced higher recognition rates when presented as photographs but the advantage disappeared when the same faces were presented as line drawings. The changes in sensitivity to configural properties thus contribute to the poor recognition of faces presented as line representations.


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3252 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1221-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J Hole ◽  
Patricia A George ◽  
Karen Eaves ◽  
Ayman Rasek

The importance of ‘configural’ processing for face recognition is now well established, but it remains unclear precisely what it entails. Through four experiments we attempted to clarify the nature of configural processing by investigating the effects of various affine transformations on the recognition of familiar faces. Experiment 1 showed that recognition was markedly impaired by inversion of faces, somewhat impaired by shearing or horizontally stretching them, but unaffected by vertical stretching of faces to twice their normal height. In experiment 2 we investigated vertical and horizontal stretching in more detail, and found no effects of either transformation. Two further experiments were performed to determine whether participants were recognising stretched faces by using configural information. Experiment 3 showed that nonglobal vertical stretching of faces (stretching either the top or the bottom half while leaving the remainder undistorted) impaired recognition, implying that configural information from the stretched part of the face was influencing the process of recognition — ie that configural processing involves global facial properties. In experiment 4 we examined the effects of Gaussian blurring on recognition of undistorted and vertically stretched faces. Faces remained recognisable even when they were both stretched and blurred, implying that participants were basing their judgments on configural information from these stimuli, rather than resorting to some strategy based on local featural details. The tolerance of spatial distortions in human face recognition suggests that the configural information used as a basis for face recognition is unlikely to involve information about the absolute position of facial features relative to each other, at least not in any simple way


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Tree

A series of experiments investigated the extent to which a developmentalprosopagnosic, A.A., was able to use configural and featural processing to recognise faces and objects (flowers). A.A. was presented with tasks in which either configural or featural processing was selectively disrupted, by scrambling or blurring. A.A.'s face- matching performance was impaired if faces were blurred to remove their featural details, but remained comparable to that of normal controls if the faces' configural properties were disrupted by stretching. This suggests he is unable to use configural processing to recognise faces, but remains able to recognise them from featural information - consistent with Collishaw and Hole's (2000) suggestion that there are two independent "routes" to face recognition. In contrast, A.A.'s performance with blurred flowers is comparable to that of normal flower experts. AA appears to have a face-specific impairment in using configural processing that does not extend to flower recognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document