Sickness absence due to musculoskeletal diagnoses: association with occupational gender segregation

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Leijon ◽  
Gunnel Hensing ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Gonäs ◽  
Anders Wikman ◽  
Marjan Vaez ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
Klas Gustafsson

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze possible changes in the gender composition of occupations in Sweden, using register data covering the whole working population. Methods: Cross tabulations on gender by occupation were computed and comparisons made of numbers and proportions of women and men aged 20–64 years to illustrate occupational gender-segregation categories in 2003 and 2011, respectively. All of those in working ages, employed in 2003 and 2011 (4.2 resp 4.7 millions individuals), were included. Differences in the distribution of women and men in all occupations were summarized using two gender-segregation indexes from 2003 and 2011, separately. Results: The proportion of women increased in the gender-integrated (⩾40–<60% women) occupations. Also, the proportion of women in high-skilled professional occupations in the male-dominated category increased, as well as the proportion of men in mostly low-skilled female-dominated occupations, mainly in the service sector. The gender-segregation of occupations measured by the Index of Dissimilarly and the Karmel and MacLachlan Index was lower in 2011 than in 2003. Conclusions: The process of de-segregation has continued during our study period, from 2003 to 2011. The proportion of women increased in occupations that demand higher education, both in gender-integrated and in male-dominated occupations, which can contribute to a decrease in the level of sickness absence for women. Men increased their proportion in low-skilled, female-dominated occupations – a group with high levels of sickness absence or disability pension.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne May Melsom ◽  
Arne Mastekaasa

Women have much higher sickness absence rates than men. One prominent hypothesis is that this is a result of gender segregation in the labour market and the differences in employment or working conditions that follow from this. Previous studies assessing this idea give mixed results, but they do not take into account the possibility of selection effects. Long-term health differences between individuals may, for instance, influence both what jobs people end up in and their levels of sickness absence. In this paper, we provide new evidence on employment and working conditions as a cause of gender differences in sickness absence. We use individual fixed-effect models to account for selection based on stable individual characteristics. Like several previous studies, we find a U-shaped relationship with high absence in both male- and female-dominated occupations. However, the fixed-effect models show that this relationship is primarily caused by overrepresentation of absence-prone individuals in female-dominated occupations. Accounting for selection, the association between the proportion of women in the occupation and sickness absence is negative. As far as sickness absence is concerned, the gender segregation in the labour market thus seems to work to the advantage of women.


1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Cotter ◽  
J.M. Defiore ◽  
J.M. Hermsen ◽  
B.M. Kowalewski ◽  
R. Vanneman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document