Predicting Supportive Behavior of Parents and Siblings to a Family Member With Intellectual Disability Living in Institutional Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Rimmerman ◽  
Ariel Chen
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S287-S287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Yangdi Han

Abstract Objectives: This study aims to examine future planning among older caregivers for family members with intellectual disability or mental illness, focusing on preferences, predictors and barriers. Method: Data were drawn from 260 caregivers (aged 50 or older) to a family member with intellectual disability or mental illness in Shanghai, China. Caregivers rated six types of future care arrangement under three circumstances: (1) the ideal situation, (2) unable to provide care due to age-related illnesses, and (3) caregivers are deceased. Socio-demographic factors associated with future planning were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Caregivers also rated twelve barriers to future planning. Results: Government-subsidized care facility is the most preferable care arrangement across the three circumstances. While continuing family care was still preferred if caregivers were to become sick or deceased, it was a less preferred option in the ideal situation. Common barriers were the cost of institutional care and the inadequate skills of the staff. Regarding the predictors of future planning, the older the caregivers were, the less likely they had no future plans. Caregivers were more likely to prefer family care over institutional care if their family members had mild impairment. Caregivers of a family member with mental illness were more likely to have no future planning than caregivers of a family member with intellectual disability. Conclusion: This study identified the needs of older caregivers for future planning specific to different circumstances. It also identified demographic profiles of future planning and the caregiver population at risk of no future planning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. e56-e63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen McKenzie ◽  
Claire Mayer ◽  
Kathryn J. Whelan ◽  
Anne McNall ◽  
Steve Noone ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii13-iii59
Author(s):  
Damien Brennan ◽  
Rebecca Murphy ◽  
Philip McCallion ◽  
Darren McCausland ◽  
Mary McCarron

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 644-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalilah Robinson Johnson ◽  
Nancy Bagatell

This article explores how circuits of accountability impact front-line service work in an intermediate care facility for individuals with intellectual disability (ICF/IID). Institutional ethnography as a theory and methodology guided the data collection and analysis processes. Participant observation and interviews were completed, and text work was employed to make visible the ways staff enacted what they believed to be their roles and responsibilities. Results indicated the service criteria established by regulatory agencies were interpreted and executed in ways that negatively influenced staff’s moral care to residents and restricted their ability to self-govern and utilize their experiential knowledge. Additionally, the institution’s circuits of accountability reflected ideals of front-line work that were inconsistent with staff’s perception of their responsibilities. These findings have implications for management and implementation of direct care in ICFs/IID and underscore the importance of aligning moral care and self-governance to front-line service work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document